بررسی واکنش گیاه کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) به سطوح مختلف فسفر تحت تنش شوری و تعیین حد بحرانی آن در خاک و گیاه

نوع مقاله : کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی علوم خاک دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

2 دانشیار گروه مهندسی علوم خاک دانشگاه شهید باهنر

3 مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی- یزد - ایران

چکیده
شوری خاک یک مشکل عمده در مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک است که باعث کاهش عملکرد و در نتیجه ناامنی غذایی می‌شود. شوری خاک با محدود کردن دسترسی به آب، ایجاد عدم تعادل تغذیه‌ای و ایجاد تنش اسمزی در گیاهان، رشد گیاه را محدود می‌کند. کمبود فسفرنیز از مشکلات رایج در این مناطق است.. تامین سطح بهینه عناصر غذایی خصوصاً فسفر باعث کاهش اثرات تنش شوری و بهبود عملکرد خواهد شد. هدف از این آزمایش تعیین حد بحرانی فسفر در خاک و برگ برای کینوا در شوری‌های مختلف است. به همین منظور آزمایشی بر مبنای طرح کاملاً تصادفی بصورت فاکتوریل با سه فاکتور سطح اولیه فسفر شامل 10 سطح (S1-S10)، کاربرد فسفر 2 سطح (کاربرد و عدم کاربرد) و دو سطح شوری آب آبیاری (dS/m6 و12) با سه تکرار در گلدان اجرا گردید. نتایج نشان داد تنش شوری شدید عملکرد دانه و زیست توده را به ترتیب 17 و 24 درصد کاهش داد ولی شاخص برداشت افزایش یافت. کاربرد کود فسفر عملکرد دانه و شاخص برداشت را افزایش داد. تنش شوری موجب افزایش غلظت فسفر در برگ و اندام هوایی و در نهایت جذب فسفر شد ولی فسفر دانه کاهش یافت. بیشترین تأثیر مثبت فسفر در خاک‌هایی با شوری متوسط مشاهده شد. نتایج اثر متقابل نشان داد که سطوح اولیه فسفر نیز نقش مهمی در تعیین میزان تأثیر شوری و کود فسفر داشت. خاک‌های با فسفر قابل جذب 8 و 13 میلی‌گرم بر کیلو‌گرم عملکرد بهتری در شرایط تنش متوسط و کاربرد فسفر نشان دادند، درحالی‌که خاکی با فسفر قابل جذب 16 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم در شرایط شوری شدید کمترین مقادیر را داشت. حد بحرانی فسفر برای خاک‌های با شوری متوسط و بالا به ترتیب 9/8 و 8/13 میلی‌گرم در کیلوگرم و براساس فسفر برگ 9/1 و25/2 گرم بر کیلوگرم به‌دست آمد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the response of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) to different levels of phosphorus under salinity stress and determining its critical limit in soil and plant

نویسندگان English

monireh Abooei 1
Naser Boroomand 2
masomeh salehi 3
1 Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture,, Shahid Bahonar university of Kerman
2 عضو هئیت علمی
3 National salinity research center, Agricultural research, Education and Extension Organization(AREEQ), Yazd, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Phosphate is a structural component of phospholipids, nucleic acids, nucleotides, coenzymes, and phosphoproteins. Phospholipids are important in membrane structure. Nucleic acids of genes and chromosomes carry genetic material from cell to cell. As a monoester, phosphorus provides an essential ligand in enzymatic catalysis. Phytic acid, the hexaphosphate ester of myo-inositol phosphate, is the most common phosphorus reserve in seeds. Inorganic and organic phosphates in plants also serve as buffers in the maintenance of cellular pH. Total phosphorus in plant tissue ranges from about 0.1 to 1%. Phosphorus deficiency suppresses or delays growth and maturity. Although phosphorus- deficient plants are generally stunted in appearance, they seldom exhibit the conspicuous foliar symptoms Phosphorus 55 characteristic of some of the other nutrient deficiencies. Furthermore, appreciable overlap often occurs with the symptoms of other nutrient deficiencies. Plant stems or leaves are sometimes dark green, often developing red and purple colors
Soil salinity is a major problem in arid and semi-arid regions, causing land degradation, desertification, and resulting food insecurity. Salt-affected soils and phosphorus deficiency are common problems in arid and semi-arid regions of the country. Soil salinity limits plant growth by limiting water availability, creating nutritional imbalances, and creating osmotic stress in plants. Quinoa is a plant that is tolerant to environmental stresses and a functional grain with high nutritional value. With the introduction of new quinoa varieties and the production of certified seeds since 2021, this plant has officially entered the cultivation pattern. The economic expansion of the area under cultivation of crops should be based on a correct fertilization program based on soil testing. The aim of this experiment is to determine the critical phosphorus limit for quinoa at different salinities based on soil testing and leaf analysis.

Materials and Methods: An experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three factors of soil phosphorus including 10 levels (S1-S10), phosphorus application at two levels (application and non-application) and two levels of irrigation water salinity (6 and 12 dS/m) with three replications in pots. In this experiment, the values calculated manually using the phosphorus fertilizer equivalent formula according to the soil test, phosphorus was added from triple superphosphate at the rates of 25.25, 50.5, 67.32, 92.57, 109.46; 134.71, 151.54, 176.79 and 218.87 mg Kg of soil with 15% moisture content and was incubated for one year due to the process of phosphorus fixation by gypsum and lime in the soil. Then, to apply phosphorus levels (0 and 9 mg phosphorus/Kg) soil was added from a triple superphosphate source. To determine the critical phosphorus level in leaves at the flowering stage, samples were taken from leaves close to the flowers. Biomass, seed weight, and harvest index were measured. The phosphorus content in shoots and seeds was also measured by the dry digestion method.

Results and Discussion: The results showed that severe salinity stress reduced grain yield and biomass by 17 and 24 percent, respectively, but the harvest index increased. Phosphorus fertilizer application increased grain yield and harvest index. Salinity stress increased phosphorus concentration in leaves and shoots and ultimately phosphorus uptake, but grain phosphorus decreased. The greatest positive effect of phosphorus was observed in soils with moderate salinity. The interaction results showed that soil P also played an important role in determining the effect of salinity and phosphorus. Soils with 8 mg/Kg and 13 mg/Kg of available phosphorus showed better performance under moderate stress conditions and phosphorus application, while soil with 16 mg/Kg of available phosphorus had the lowest values under severe salinity conditions. The critical phosphorus limit for soils with moderate and high salinity was 8.9 and 13.8 mg/Kg, respectively, and based on leaf phosphorus, 1.9 and 2.25 g/Kg.

Conclusion: In general, these results showed that optimal management of phosphorus fertilization and reduction of the effects of salinity stress improved growth and yield of quinoa. This is especially important in areas with moderate salinity for sustainable use of soil and water resources. Careful management of phosphorus nutrition under saline conditions is essential to improve phosphorus allocation to seeds and maintain crop yield and quality.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Cate Nelson
Harvest Index
Phosphorus management
Salt stress
  1.  

    1. Moameni, A. 2011. Geographical Distribution and Salinity Levels of Soil Resources of Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 24(10):203-215. [In Persian with English Abstract]
    2. Kumar, G. and Kumar, A. 2019. Salinity stress in crop plants: Mechanism and management. Think India Journal, 22:1197-1201.
    3. Adolf, V.I., Jacobsen, S.E., and Shabala, S. 2012. Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 92:43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.04.011.
    4. Maradini-Filho, A. 2017. Quinoa: nutritional aspects. Journal of Nutraceuticals and Food Science, 2(1:3): 1-5.
    5. Abdellatif, A.S.A. 2018. Chemical and technological evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivated in Egypt. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 2(7):42-53.
    6. Iranshahr, E. and Sepehr, E. 2012. Evaluation of phosphorus acquisition and utilization efficiency of wheat genotypes in rock phosphate. [In Persian with English Abstract]
    7. Hopkins, B. and Ellsworth, J. Year. Phosphorus nutrition in potato production. Idaho Potato Conference.
    8. Malhi, S., Haderlein, L., Pauly, D., and Johnston, A. 2002. Improving fertilizer phosphorus use efficiency. Journal of land Management (Soil and Water sci.), 8 (2):1-11. [In Persian with English Abstract].
    9. Vance, C.P., Uhde‐Stone, C., and Allan, D.L. 2003. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist, 157(10):423-447. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00726.x.
    10. Shahbazi, N., Kiani, G., Pakdin Parizi, A., and Mehraban Joubani, P. 2021. Physiological and biochemical responses of different sesame (Sesamum indicum) genotypes under salinity stress. Plant Process and Function, 10(45): 207-234. [In Persian with English Abstract].
    11. Mallarino, A. and Blackmer, A. 1992. Comparison of methods for determining critical concentrations of soil test phosphorus for corn. Agronomy Journal, 84(10):850-856. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400050022x.
    12. Simard, R.R. and Tran, T.S. 1993. Evaluating Plant‐available Phosphorus with the Electro‐Ultrafiltration Technique. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(2):404-409. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020032x.
    13. Cate Jr, R.B. and Nelson, L.A. 1971. A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 35(4):658-660. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500040019x.
    14. Gee, G. and Bauder, J. 1979. Particle size analysis by hydrometer: a simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(10):1004-1007. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300050028x.
    15. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5:475-490.
    16. Rhoades, J. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5:417-435.
    17. Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(10):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
    18. Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture. Circular. No. 939
    19. Ali Ehyaei, M. and Asgharzadeh, A.A. 1993. Description of methods for chemical analysis of soil, Volume 1, Publication No. 893, Soil and Water Research Institute. [In Persian]
    20. Shahabi, A.A. and J., M.Malakoti. 1995. Determination of phosphorus fertilizer equivalent in calcareous soils with different amounts of clay. Master's thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian]
    21. Hasheminejhad, Y. and Gholami Touran Poshti, M. 2008. Introducing an appropriate packing method in disturbed soil columns and its verification to achieve a homogeneous porous media. Water and Soil, 22(2). [In Persian]
    22. Anagholi, A. and Ranjbar, Gh. 2019. Principles and Methods of Salinity Stress Tests in Agricultural Research, ed. 55810. Agricultural Research, Education and Promotion Organization. [In Persian]
    23. Beyrami, H., Rahimian, M.H., Salehi, M., Yazdani-Biouki, R., Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., and Shiran-Tafti, M. 2024. Determination of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) crop coefficient and water requirement in lysimetric condition. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 17(10):967-978. [In Persian with English Abstract]
    24. Sosa-Zuniga, V., Brito, V., Fuentes, F., and Steinfort, U. 2017. Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology, 171(10):117-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12387.
    25. Wallinga, I., Van Vark, W., Houba, V., and Van der Lee, J. 1989. Soil and plant analysis, series of syllabi part 7, Plant analysis procedure. Wageningen Agriculture University, Wageningen, 7:197-200.
    26. Nelson, R. 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 9:181-197.
    27. Bouras, H., Choukr-Allah, R., Amouaouch, Y., Bouaziz, A., Devkota, K.P., El Mouttaqi, A., Bouazzama, B., and Hirich, A. 2022. How does quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) respond to phosphorus fertilization and irrigation water salinity? Plants, 11(2):216. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11020216.
    28. Bouras, H., Bouaziz, A., Bouazzama, B., Hirich, A., and Choukr-Allah, R. 2021. How phosphorus fertilization alleviates the effect of salinity on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) productivity and quality. Agronomy, 11(8):1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081491.
    29. Shahverdi, M.A., Omidi, H., and Tabatabaei, S.J. 2019. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) responses to NaCl stress: Growth, photosynthetic pigments, diterpene glycosides and ion content in root and shoot. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 18(4):355-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.02.007.
    30. Hozayn, M., Mohamed, E.-S., and El-Mahdy, A.A. 2024. Salinity Stress Implication on Vegetation, Anatomy and Yield of Some (Chenopodium quinoa) Varieties using Magnetized Water Technology. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 67(8):635-646.
    31. Lyu, J., Aiwaili, P., Gu, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Huang, H., Zeng, R., Ma, C., and Gao, J. 2022. Chrysanthemum MAF2 regulates flowering by repressing gibberellin biosynthesis in response to low temperature. The Plant Journal, 112(10):1159-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15699.
    32. Derbali, I., Derbali, W., Gharred, J., Manaa, A., Slama, I., and Koyro, H.-W. 2023. Mitigating salinity stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) with biochar and superabsorber polymer amendments. Plants, 13(10):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13010092.
    33. Naz, M., Hussain, S., Ashraf, I., and Farooq, M. 2023. Exogenous application of proline and phosphorus help improving maize performance under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 46(10):2342-2350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2023.2203387.
    34. Dey, G., Banerjee, P., Sharma, R.K., Maity, J.P., Etesami, H., Shaw, A.K., Huang, Y.-H., Huang, H.-B., and Chen, C.-Y. 2021. Management of phosphorus in salinity-stressed agriculture for sustainable crop production by salt-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacteria—A review. Agronomy, 11(8):1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081552.
    35. Jahan, M.N., Barua, S., Ali, H., Ali, M.N., Chowdhury, M.S.H., Hasan, M.M., Ferdous, T., Eti, F.S., Khayer, A., and Hossen, K. 2020. Effects of phosphorus fertilization on hybrid varieties of mungbean [Vigna radiata (40) Wilczek] in a salinity prone area of the subtropics. Acta Agrobotanica, 73(10). https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2020.031.
    36. Gulmezoglu, N. and Daghan, H. 2017. The interactive effects of phosphorus and salt on growth, water potential and phosphorus uptake in green beans. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1503_20822088.
    37. Sadji-Ait Kaci, H., Chaker-Haddadj, A., and Aid, F. 2017. Interactive effects of salinity and two phosphorus fertilizers on growth and grain yield of Cicer arietinum Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science, 67(10):208-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2016.1247043.
    38. Abd El-Hamed, E., Metwally, S., Matar, M., and Yousef, N. 2012. Impact of phosphorus fertilization in alleviating the adverse effects of salinity on wheat grown on different soil types. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 60(10):265-281. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.60.2012.3.5.
    39. Malhotra, H., Vandana, Sharma, S., and Pandey, R. 2018. Phosphorus nutrition: plant growth in response to deficiency and excess. Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance, 171-190.
    40. Saadat, S., Esmail Nejad, L., and Tadayonnejad, M. 2023. The effect of phosphorus in reducing the effect of salinity on wheat yield at different growth stages. Haloculture, 1(10):42-53. [In Persian with English Abstract]
    41. Mohammadi, A., Bahmanyar, M., and Ghajar Sepanlou, M. 2013. Application of gypsum and manure on improving the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in leaves and seeds of wheat under salinity stress. Agricultural Engineering, 36(10):1-11.
    42. Zhao, D.-Y., Zhang, X.-L., Zhao, S.-P., Liu, G.-L., Zhang, Z.-W., Zhao, W.-F., Li, X.-P., Ali Khan, S., and Siddique, K.H. 2023. Biomass allocation and nutrients utilization in wheat as affected by phosphorus placement and salt stress. Agronomy, 13(6):1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061570.
    43. Bechtaoui, N., Rabiu, M.K., Raklami, A., Oufdou, K., Hafidi, M., and Jemo, M. 2021. Phosphate-Dependent Regulation of Growth and Stresses Management in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12:679916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.679916
    44. Su, R., Zhang, Z., Chang, C., Peng, Q., Cheng, X., Pang, J., He, H., and Lambers, H. 2022. Interactive effects of phosphorus fertilization and salinity on plant growth, phosphorus and sodium status, and tartrate exudation by roots of two alfalfa cultivars. Annals of Botany, 129(10):53-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab127.
    45. Tadayonnejad, M., Dehqani, M., and Parsadoust, F. 2021. Effect of salinity stress and phosphorus application in different stages of wheat growth on biomass and some of its physiological characteristics. Plant Process and Function, 10(44):119-132.
    46. Młodzińska, E. and Zboińska, M. 2016. Phosphate uptake and allocation–a closer look at Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Oryza sativa L. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7:1198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01198.
    47. Storey, R., Schachtman, D., and Thomas, M. 2003. Root structure and cellular chloride, sodium and potassium distribution in salinized grapevines. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26(6):789-800. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00997.x.
    48. Khan, F., Siddique, A.B., Shabala, S., Zhou, M., and Zhao, C. 2023. Phosphorus Plays Key Roles in Regulating Plants’ Physiological Responses to Abiotic Stresses. Plants, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152861.
    49. Khodshenas, M.A., Ghadbeiklou, J., and Dadivar, M. 2019. Determination of Critical Level of Soil Phosphorus for Bean. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 33(10):25-35.
    50. Mostashari, M. 2014. Determining the critical limit and nutritional balance of phosphorus in corn crop. Proceedings of the 13th Iranian Soil Science Congress Sustainable Soil Sustainable Production. Ahvaz, Iran.
    51. Reyhanitabar, A. 2014. Determination of Soil Phosphorus Critical Level for Corn Plant in East Azerbaijan Province. Water and Soil, 28(2):330-342. [In Persian with English Abstract].
    52. Karimi Amir Kiasar, M., Kavoosi, M., and Shokri Vahed, H. 2013. Phosphorus Critical Concentration in Paddy Soils of Guilan Province. Water and Soil Science, 23(10):123-134. [In Persian with English Abstract].
    53. Taaime, N., El Mejahed, K., Choukr-Allah, R., Bouabid, R., Oukarroum, A., and El Gharous, M. 2023. Optimization of macronutrients for improved grain yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) crop under semi-arid conditions of Morocco. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14:1146658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1146658.
    54. Alvar-Beltrán, J., Napoli, M., Dao, A., Amoro, O., Verdi, L., Orlandini, S., and Dalla Marta, A. 2021. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium mass balances in an irrigated quinoa field. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 16(10):1788. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1788
    55. Singh, S., Jain, A., and Varma, A. 2021. Root analysis of quinoa plant. Biology and Biotechnology of Quinoa: Super Grain for Food Security, 153-165.