جداسازی باکتری‌های مقاوم به نمک از ریزوسفر گیاهان بیابانی و تأثیر آن‌ها بر رشد گیاه ذرت (Zea mays L.) در یک خاک‌ شور

نوع مقاله : کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشدگروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

چکیده
استفاده از باکتری‌های ریزوسفری مقاوم به شوری یک راهبرد موثر برای بهبود رشد گیاهان در خاک‌های شور می‌باشد. این مطالعه با هدف جداسازی باکتری‌های بومی مقاوم به شوری از ریزوسفر گیاهان بیابانی استان کرمان و تاثیر کاربرد آن‌ها بر برخی از خصوصیات فیزیولوژیکی و بیوشیمیایی گیاه ذرت در شرایط تنش شوری انجام شد. در این مطالعه ابتدا از ریزوسفر درختان بیابانی باکتری‌ها جداسازی و خالص‌سازی شد. سپس رشد باکتری‌ها در غلظت‌های مختلف کلرید سدیم (0، 320، 650 و 850 میلی‌مولار) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. همچنین آزمون گلخانه‌ای در قالب طرح پایه کامل تصادفی با آرایش فاکتوریل شامل 4 سویه باکتری ‌(BZ79، BR90، BG59، BG71 و B0 (شاهد بدون باکتری)) و دو خاک شور و غیرشور در سه تکرار روی گیاه ذرت انجام شد. در پایان دوره پارامترهای فیزیولوژیکی و بیوشیمیایی گیاه ذرت اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج تجزیه آماری نشان داد که باکتری‌ها از نظر مقاومت به شوری با هم تفاوت معنی‌داری داشتند و برخی از باکتری‌ها توانایی تحمل غلظت‌های بالای کلرید سدیم تا 850 میلی‌مولار را نیز داشتند. بر اساس نتایج گلخانه با افزایش سطح شوری خاک، وزن خشک اندام هوایی (4/51 درصد)، میزان کلروفیل a (2/64 درصد)، کلروفیل b (115 درصد) و کاروتنوئید (3 درصد) کاهش یافت. اما تلقیح گیاه با باکتری‌های مقاوم باعث افزایش معنی‌دار پارامترهای فوق در خاک‌های شور شد. در خاک شور کاربرد باکتری‌های BZ79، BR90، BG59 و BG71 وزن خشک اندام هوایی را به ترتیب 2/62، 5/39، 59 و 4/41 درصد نسبت به شاهد بدون تلقیح باکتری افزایش داد. تلقیح گیاه ذرت با باکتری‌های BZ79، BG59 و BG71 در خاک شور غلظت کلروفیل a را به ترتیب 7/1، 9/1 و 4/2 برابر و غلظت کلروفیل b را به ترتیب 6/2، 7/1 و 8/1 برابر نسبت به شاهد افزایش داد وکاربرد دو باکتری‎ BR90 وBG59 توانست میزان کاروتنوئید را بیش از سه برابر نسبت به شاهد افزایش دهد. با توجه به تاثیر مفید باکتری‌های بومی مقاوم در شرایط شوری خاک، این میکروارگانیسم‌ها پتانسیل کاندید شدن به عنوان کود زیستی را در آینده خواهند داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Isolation of Salt-Tolerant Bacteria from The Rhizosphere of Desert Plants and Their Effects on Maize (Zea mays L.) Growth in a Saline Soil

نویسندگان English

Yasamin Zahra Mazidi Moradi 1
Mahboobeh Abolhasani Zeraatkar 2
Mehdi Sarcheshmeh pour 3
1 M.Sc Graduate, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Abiotic stresses are the most important limiting factors affecting agricultural productivity. Soil salinity is considered one of the most severe abiotic stresses in plants. Crop plants must use biological mechanisms to cope with unfavorable environmental conditions. Their growth, development, and yield will be reduced if they fail in coping with such conditions. The plant microbiome provides plants with the main basic support they need to obtain nutrients, resist diseases, and tolerate abiotic stresses. The metabolic and genetic potential of the plant microbiome transforms plants into appropriate organisms for fighting unfavorable environmental conditions. Hence, the use of salt-tolerant halophyte rhizosphere bacteria is an effective strategy for improving plant growth in saline soils.

Materials and methods: Consequently, this research intended to isolate indigenous resistant bacteria adapted to salinity stress conditions from the rhizosphere of desert plants in Kerman Province and determine their effects on some physiological and biochemical characteristics of maize plants in soil under salt stress. First, the rhizosphere bacteria of desert trees were isolated and purified. Next, their growth was studied at various sodium chloride concentrations (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 650 mM) in solid microbial culture media and then in quantitative testing at various sodium chloride concentrations (0, 320, 650, and 850 mM) in liquid microbial culture media. Four bacterial strains (BZ79, BR90, BG59 and BG71) were selected for the greenhouse stage. The greenhouse experiment was performed on maize plants with three replications using a completely randomized design arranged as a factorial consisting of four salt-tolerant strains and a control at two soil salinity levels: non-saline soil (1.32 dS/m) and saline soil (12 dS/m). The experiment was completed in 90 days. Finally, dry weight of the aerial organs, fresh weight of the aerial organs and of the roots, length of the aerial organs and of the roots, concentrations of chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid content of maize plants in saline and non-saline soils were measured.

Results and Discussion: The results of the statistical analysis showed that the bacterial strains differed significantly in salt tolerance, and some of them were even able to tolerate high sodium chloride concentrations (up to 850 mM) and grow well. Salt stress causes osmotic stress, ionic imbalance, and oxidative damage in maize plants thereby decreasing growth and photosynthetic efficiency. The results indicated that increases in salinity level reduced dry matter of the aerial organs (51.4%), fresh weight of the aerial organs (24.4%), fresh weight of the roots (15.9%), length of the aerial organs (7.8%), chlorophyll a content (64.2%), chlorophyll b content (115%), and carotenoid content (3%). However, inoculation of the maize plants with salt-tolerant bacteria significantly increased dry weight of the maize plants, fresh weight of the aerial organs and of the roots, length of the aerial organs and of the roots, concentrations of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll, and carotenoid content in non-saline and saline soils. Of course, the increases in these plant parameters caused by inoculation with salt-tolerant bacteria were more pronounced in saline soil compared to non-saline soil. The results demonstrated that, compared to the uninoculated control (B0), inoculation of the plants with the bacterial strains BZ79, BR90, BG59, and BG71 increased dry weight of the aerial organs in the non-saline soil by 20%, 12.3%, 13%, and 3%, respectively, and by 62.2%, 39.5%, 59%, and 41.4%, respectively, in the saline soil. The largest dry weight of the aerial organs (25.95 g) was recorded in the maize plants inoculated with BZ79 and the smallest (1 g) in those uninoculated with the control (B0). Compared to the uninoculated control (B0), inoculation of the maize plants with BZ79, BG59, and BG71 in the saline soil improved chlorophyll a concentration by 1.7%, 1.9%, and 2.4%, respectively, and increased chlorophyll b concentration by 2.6%, 1.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. However, inoculation with BR90 did not increase chlorophyll a content. In the saline soil, inoculation with both BR90 and BG59 led to a three-fold increase in carotenoid content compared to the uninoculated control.

conclusion: Among the indigenous rhizosphere bacteria, BZ79 was the most effective in improving maize plant tolerance to salt stress. These findings indicated the potential of these indigenous salt-tolerant bacteria as an effective factor for reducing the damage caused by salt stress by increasing the physiological performance of the maize plants and the photosynthetic pigments in them. Given the beneficial effect of the indigenous salt-tolerant bacteria under saline soil conditions, these microorganisms have the potential to be candidate as biofertilizer in the future.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Abiotic stresses
Photosynthesis
carotenoid
chlorophyll
biofertilizer
  1. Abd Allah, E.F., Alqarawi, A.A., Hashem, A., Radhakrishnan, R., Al-Huqail, A.A., Al-Otibi, F.O.N., and Egamberdieva, D. 2018. Endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis (BERA 71) improves salt tolerance in chickpea plants by regulating the plant defense mechanisms. Journal of Plant Interactions, 13(1): 37-44. 1080/17429145.2017.1414321
  2. Abd Allah, E.F., Hashem, A., Alqarawi, A.A., Bahkali, A.H., and Alwhibi, M.S. 2015. Enhancing growth performance and systemic acquired resistance of medicinal plant Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22(3): 274-283. 1016/j.sjbs.2015.03.004
  3. Abeer, H., Abdallah, E.F., Alqarawi, A.A., Al-Huqail, A.A., Alshalawi, S.R. M., Wirth, S., and Dilfuza, E. 2015. Impact of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis on growth and physiological parameters of Bassia indica (Indian bassia) grown udder salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47(5): 1735-1741.
  4. Alori, E.T., Emmanuel, O.C., Glick, B.R., and Babalola, O.O. 2020. Plant-archaea relationships: A potential means to improve crop production in arid and semiarid regions. World Journal Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36(9): 133. 1007/s11274-020-02910-6
  5. Banakar, M.H., Rahimian, M.H., Ranjbar, G.H., and Shirani Tafti, M. 2014. Effect of saline irrigation on seedlings shoot and root characteristics of five pistachio cultivars in Yazd province. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28(2): 341-351 (in Persian with English abstract). 22092/jwra.2014.100035
  6. Bor, M., Özdemir, F., and Türkan, I. 2003. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant science, 164(1), 77-84.‏ 1016/S0168-9452(02)00338-2
  7. Bruuinsma, J. 1963. The Quantitative analysis of chlorophylls a and b in plant extracts. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2. 1111/j.1751-1097.1963.tb08220.x
  8. Camejo, D., Jiménez, A., Alarcón, J.J., Torres, W., Gómez, J.M., and Sevilla, F. 2006. Changes in photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant activities following heat-shock treatment in tomato plants. Functional Plant Biology, 33(2): 177–187. 1071/FP05067
  9. Christakis, C.A., Daskalogiannis, G., Chatzaki, A., Markakis, E.A., Mermigka, G., Sagia, A., Rizzo, G.F., Catara, V., Lagkouvardos, I., Studholme, D.J., et al. 2021. Endophytic bacterial isolates from halophytes demonstrate phytopathogen biocontrol and plant growth promotion under high salinity. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12: 681567. 3389/fmicb.2021.681567
  10. Duca, D.R., and Glick, B.R. 2020. Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and its regulation in plant-associated bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104: 8607-8619. 1007/s00253-020-10869-5
  11. El-Esawi M.A., Al-Ghamdi A.A., Ali H.M., and Alayafi A.A. 2019. Azospirillum lipoferum FK1 confers improved salt tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) by modulating osmolytes, antioxidant machinery and stress-related genes expression. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 159:55–65. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.12.001
  12. Ghyselinck, J., Velivelli, S.L., Heylen, K., O’Herlihy, E., Franco, J., Rojas, M., and Prestwich, B.D. 2013. Bioprospecting in potato fields in the Central Andean Highlands: screening of rhizobacteria for plant growth-promoting properties. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 36(2): 116-127. 1016/j.syapm.2012.11.007
  13. Habibollahi, N., Mahdiyeh, M., and Amirjani, M.R. 2012. Effect of salt stress on growth, proline, antioxidant enzyme activity and photosystem efficiency in salt-sensitive and tolerant rice cultivars. Journal of Plant Biological Sciences, 4(13): 85-96 (in Persian with English abstract). 1001.1.20088264.1391.4.13.8.3
  14. Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Lakshmanan, G.M.A., Sridharan, R., and Panneerselvam, R. 2007. NaCl as a physiological modulator of proline metabolism and antioxidant potential in Phyllanthus amarus. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 330(11) 806–813. 1016/j.crvi.2007.08.009
  15. James, R.A., Caemmerer, S., Condon, A.T., Zwart, A.B., and Munns, R. 2008. Genetic variation in tolerance to the osmotic stress componentof salinity stress in durum wheat. Functional Plant Biology, 35(2): 111-123. 1071/FP07234
  16. Jamil, A., Riaz, S., Ashraf, M., and Foolad, M.R. 2011. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(5): 435-458. 1080/07352689.2011.605739
  17. Kang, S.M., Radhakrishnan, R., and Lee, I.J. 2015. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum GR53, a potent biocontrol agent resists Rhizoctonia disease on Chinese cabbage through hormonal and antioxidants regulation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31: 1517-1527. 1007/s11274-015-1896-0
  18. Kang, S.M., Waqas, M., Khan, A.L., and Lee, I.J. 2014. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria: potential candidates for gibberellins production and crop growth promotion. Use of Microbes for the Alleviation of Soil Stresses, 1: 1-19. 1007/978-1-4614-9466-9_1
  19. Karlidag, H., Yildirim, E., Turan, M., Pehluvan, M., and Donmez, F. 2013. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mitigate deleterious effects of salt stress on strawberry plants (Fragaria× ananassa). Hort Science, 48(5): 563-567. 21273/HORTSCI.48.5.563
  20. Kaushal, M., and Wani, S.P. 2016. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria: drought stress alleviators to ameliorate crop production in drylands. Annals Microbiology, 66: 35–42. 1007/s13213-015-1112-3
  21. Kerbab, S., Silini, A., Chenari Bouket, A., Cherif-Silini, H., Eshelli, M., El Houda Rabhi, N., Belbahri, L. 2021. Mitigation of NaCl Stress in wheat by rhizosphere engineering using salt habitat adapted PGPR halotolerant bacteria. Applied Sciences, 11: 1034. 3390/app11031034
  22. Khadri, M., Tejera, N.A., and Lluch, C. 2006. Alleviation of salt stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by exogenous abscisic acid supply. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 25: 110-119. 1007/s00344-005-0004-3
  23. Krishnan, R.R., and Kumari, B.D. 2008. Effect of N-triacontanol on the growth of salt stressed soybean plants. Journal of Bioscience, 19(2): 53-62.‏ https://ejournal.usm.my/tlsr/article/view/tlsr_vol19-no-2-2008_5
  24. Kumar, S. 2012. Assay Guided Comparison for Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Activities with Special Reference to Medicinal Plants. Antioxidant Enzyme, 14: 382–400. 5772/50782
  25. Latef, A.A.H., Abu Alhmad, M.F., Kordrostami, M., Abo-Baker, A.B.A.E., and Zakir, A. 2020. Inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum or Azotobacter chroococcum reinforces maize growth by improving physiological activities under saline conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 39: 1293–1306. 1007/s00344-020-10065-9
  26. Mahajan, S. and Tuteja, N. 2005. Cold, Salinity and Drought Stresses: An Overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 444(2): 139-158. 1016/j.abb.2005.10.018
  27. Mohamed, H.I., and Gomaa, E.Z. 2012. Effect of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth and pigment composition of radish plants (Raphanus sativus) under NaCl stress. Photosynthetica, 50: 263-272. 1007/s11099-012-0032-8
  28. Nadeem, S.M., Ahmad, M., Tufail, M.A., Asghar, H.N., Nazli, F., and Zahir, Z.A. 2021. Appraising the potential of EPS-producing rhizobacteria with ACC-deaminase activity to improve growth and physiology of maize under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 172: 463–476. 1111/ppl.13212. Epub 2020 Oct 11
  29. Nadeem, S.M., Zahir, Z.A., Naveed, M., and Nawaz, S. 2013. Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Annals of Microbiology, 63(1): 225-232. 1007/s13213-012-0465-0
  30. Radhakrishnan, R., and Lee, I.J. 2013. Regulation of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and fatty acids in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by spermidine promotes plant growth against salt stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 3315-3322. 1007/s11738-013-1364-0
  31. Rivera, D., Mora, V., Lopez, G., Rosas, S., Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., and Cassan, F. 2018. New insights into indole‐3‐acetic acid metabolism in Azospirillum brasilense. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 125(6): 1774-1785. 1111/jam.14080
  32. Saikia, J., Sarma, R.K., Dhandia, R., Yadav, A., Bharali, R., Gupta, V.K., and Saikia, R. 2018. Alleviation of drought stress in pulse crops with ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria isolated from acidic soil of Northeast India. Scientific Reports, 23: 3560. 1038/s41598-018-21921-w
  33. Sandhya, V., and Ali, S.Z. 2015. The production of exopolysaccharide by Pseudomonas putida GAP-P45 under various abiotic stress conditions and its role in soil aggregation. Microbiology, 84: 512-519.‏ 1134/S0026261715040153
  34. Sarkar, D., and Rakshit, A. 2020. Safeguarding the fragile rice–wheat ecosystem of the Indo-Gangetic Plains through bio-priming and bioaugmentation interventions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 96(12): fiaa221. 1093/femsec/fiaa221
  35. Sharma, A., Shahzad, B., Kumar, V., Kohli, S. K., Sidhu, G. P. S., Bali, A. S., Handa, N., Kapoor, D., Bhardwaj, R., and Zheng, B. 2019. Phytohormones regulate accumulation of osmolytes under abiotic stress. Biomolecules, 9(7): 285. 3390/biom9070285
  36. Sharma, A., Shankhdhar, D., and Shankhdhar, S.C. 2013. Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59: 89–94. 17221/683/2012-PSE
  37. Singh, J., and Thakur, J.K. 2018. Photosynthesis and abiotic stress in plants. Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants, 27-46. 1007/978-981-10-9029-5_2
  38. Suarez, C., Cardinale, M., Ratering, S., Steffens, D., Jung, S., Montoya, A.M.Z., and et al. 2015. Plant growth-promoting effects of Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus on summer barley (Hordeum vulgare ) under salt stress. Applied Soil Ecology, 95: 23–30. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.017
  39. Szalai, G., and Janda, T. 2009. Effect of salt stress on the salicylic acid synthesis in young maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(3): 165-171. 1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00352.x
  40. Tapias, D.R., Galvan, A.M., Diaz, S.P., Obando, M., Rivera, D., and Bonilla, R. 2012. Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Applied Soil Ecology, 61: 264–272. 1016/j.apsoil.2012.01.006
  41. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., and Altman, A. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218: 1-14. 1007/s00425-003-1105-5
  42. Yildirim, E.R., Turan, M.E., and Donmez, M.F. 2008. Mitigation of salt stress in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Roumanian Biotechnological Letters,13:3933-943https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288404318
  43. Zakavi, M., Askari, H., and Shahrooei, M. 2022. Maize growth response to different Bacillus strains isolated from a salt-marshland area under salinity stress. BMC Plant Biology, 22(1): 367. 1186/s12870-022-03702-w
  44. Zhang, C., Li, X., Yin, L., Liu, C., Zou, H., Wu, Z., and Zhang, Z. 2019. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of Brevibacterium frigoritolerans ZB201705 isolated from drought- and salt-stressed rhizosphere soil of maize. Annals of Microbiology, 69, 1489–1496. 1007/s13213-019-01532-0
  45. Zhao, Y. 2012. Auxin biosynthesis: a simple two-step pathway converts tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid in plants. Molecular plant, 5(2): 334-338. 1093/mp/ssr104
  46. Zörb, C., Herbst, R., Forreiter, C., and Schubert, S. 2009. Short‐term effects of salt exposure on the maize chloroplast protein pattern. Proteomics, 9(17): 4209-4220.‏ 1002/pmic.200800791