بررسی تغییرات زمانی برخی ویژگیهای کیفیت خاک تحت تاثیر مدیریت های مختلف خاکورزی در اراضی کشاورزی غرب استان گلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری، گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

2 دانشیار دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

3 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

4 دانشیار گروه شیمی، دانشگاه گلستان

5 دانش آموخته مقطع دکتری، گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

چکیده
مزایای اقتصادی کشاورزی و خاکورزی حفاظتی در سال‌‌های اولیه اجرای آن بسیار بحث برانگیز و از لحاظ اجرا دارای چالش‌‌هایی است. لذا این مطالعه با هدف تأثیر مدیریت‌‌های مختلف خاکورزی بر برخی از شاخصهای کیفیت خاک در طی سال-های اولیه اجرا انجام گرفته است. این مطالعه در شهرستان نوکنده استان گلستان در قالب آزمایش بلوک کامل تصادفی در سه نوع مدیریت خاکورزی شامل مدیریت کشت حفاظتی بدون شخم (CA) ، کشت و شخم مرسوم (CT) و کشت حفاظتی با خاکورزی حداقل بصورت ریزبد (MT)، و طی 4 سال انجام شد. در هر مدیریت 30 نقطه بصورت تصادفی انتخاب و از عمق 0 تا 20 سانتیمتری نمونه برداری انجام گردید. نتایج نشان داد مقدار ماده آلی خاک در سال چهارم در تیمارهای بدون شخم و شخم حداقل به ترتیب افزایشی به میزان 47 و 17 درصد نسبت به سال اول مشاهده شد. ارزش خنثی سازی کل به ترتیب در مدیریت‌‌های ، شخم مرسوم > بدون شخم >شخم حداقل مشاهده شد. مقدار نیتروژن کل در دو مدیریت حفاظتی افزایش داشته است که به معنی کاهش تلفات نیتروژن در مدت چهار ساله است. کشت بدون شخم در سال چهارم می‌‌‌تواند مقدار فسفر قابل دسترس را در خاک 47 درصد نسبت به سال اول افزایش دهد و عنصر پتاسیم در سال چهارم نسبت به سا‌‌ل اول در تیمار بدون شخم58 و شخم حداقل 52 درصد افزایش داشته است در حالیکه در شخم مرسوم افزایش مقدار پتاسیم 6 درصد بوده است. مقدار عناصر آهن و روی در شخم حداقل و مقدار منگنز در تیمار بدون شخم فراوانی بیشتری نشان داد. با توجه به اینکه روند تغییرات متفاوتی در این تحقیق به دست آمده است به نظر می‌‌رسد برای رسیدن به نتایج بهتر و قابل مشاهده توسط کشاورزان نیاز به زمان کافی برای اجرا است. این یافته‌ها یک چشم انداز عملی به کشاورزان، مروجان و مدیران ارائه می‌دهد تا در سالهای اولیه اجرا به دستاوردها بصورت واقع بینانه توجه نمایند. پیشنهاد می‌‌شود در سال‌های ابتدایی اجرای این گونه طرحهای حفاظتی در مزارعی که شکنندگی و عدم قطعیت‌ها در آن بیشتر است، حمایت‌های دولتی و پشتیبانی صورت گیرد تا به پایداری نهایی برسند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the temporal changes in some soil quality properties in different tillage management in agricultural lands of western Golestan province

نویسندگان English

Bahareh Kiani 1
Farshad Kiani 2
Azam Rezaee 3
Pouneh Ebrahimi 4
Samaneh Mahzari 5
1 Former Ph.D. student, Soil Science Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
3 Associate Professor, Agricultural Economics Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
4 Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, Golestan University
5 Former Ph.D. student, Soil Science Department, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
چکیده English

Introduction: Different strategies have been proposed to sustainable soil management, including conservation agriculture. Conservation agriculture is based on four principles. Reducing plowing and soil disturbance, leaving an appropriate amount of plant residues on the soil surface, crop rotation with an economic cultivation pattern, and sustainable production of agricultural products with benefits are the basis of these four principles. The economic benefits of conservation agriculture and tillage in the early years have challenges in terms of implementation. There are few studies on the impact of the initial phase of conservation agriculture on soil nutrients and its consequences, so this study aims at the impact of Various protection management on some soil quality indicators during the initial years of implementation. Recently, farmers in Golestan province have been following the conservation agriculture in their fields without implementing a standard method and uniform instructions. Therefore, different results are obtained by implementing conservation tillage methods. In general, the economic benefits of conservation agriculture in the first year of its implementation are very controversial, and farmers think that the implementation of conservation agriculture may not be profitable due to the high consumption of herbicides and low yield, especially in the early years of its implementation.

Methods and Materials: This study was conducted in Nokandeh region of Golestan province in the form of a randomized complete block experiment in three types of management including optional(minimum) tillage (MT), Conservation agriculture (CA) and conventional tillage (CT) and in 4 years. In each management, 30 soil samples were selected from the depth of 0 to 20 cm and the indicators were evaluated. Soil pH, Texture, Electrical Conductivity, Total Neutralizing Value (TNV), Soil Carbon, Total Nitrogen, Available Phosphorus and Potassium, and soil micronutrients contain Fe, Mn and Zn were evaluated using scientific methods. Data normality was also tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The difference between the means has been calculated using Duncan's test at the confidence level of 0.01 and 0.05. SAS ver 9.4 software was used to analyze the data.

Results and Discussion: he results show that the effect of tillage management on pH changes is not significant, while the effect of time on pH changes is significant at the one percent level (p ≤ 0.01). The pH in no-till in the fourth year was (7.64) and minimum tillage (7.62) and conventional tillage (7.4). The lowest pH value was in conventional tillage treatment, which decreased by 3.6 percent compared to the first year. The main decrease in electrical conductivity was observed in no-till, with a 32% decrease in soil electrical conductivity in the fourth year compared to the first year, and the minimum changes were observed in conventional tillage. The amount of organic soil in conservation agriculture and then OC was observed to increase by 47% and 17%, respectively, compared to the first year. The implementation of conservation management in different years was not significant on the amount of TNV, but the percentage of the amount of TNV was observed in tillage managements, CT > CA > CT respectively. The amount of total nitrogen has increased in MT and CA, which means a decrease in nitrogen leaching in four years. Conservation agriculture in the fourth year can increase the amount of available phosphorus in the soil by 47% compared to the first year, and the potassium element has increased by 58% in CA and 52% in MT, while the potassium content has increased by 6%. The elements of iron and zinc in MT and the amount of manganese in CA were higher. The results of the present study showed that the most important management factors affecting the initial years are the amount of soil organic matter. Soil nutrients are sensitive indicators of fertility. Changes in soil nutrients increase with a gentle slope in the initial years. And this trend is sometimes accompanied by uncertainties. There are significant aspects of water, plant, and soil interactions in nutrient cycling, etc., that are still unknown.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that although low tillage and no-till treatments improve soil nutritional and fertility indices compared to conventional tillage, the trend of changes in these indices over time is different, which may discourage farmers and promoters in the early years of implementation. Considering that different results have been obtained in this research, it seems that to achieve better and visible results by farmers, sufficient time is needed for implementation. These findings provide a practical perspective to farmers, promoters and managers to realistically pay attention to the achievements in the early years of implementation. It is suggested that in the initial years of implementation in farms with greater fragility and uncertainty, government support should be provided to reach the final sustainability of the plan.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Conservation Agriculture
No tillage
Soil Quality
Soil temporal variation
Golestan province
  1. References

    1. Allison, L. E., Moodie, C. D., 1965. Carbonate. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological properties, Norman, A.G., (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy - Soil Science Society of America, WI, USA. pp. 1379–1396. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c40.
    2. Alvarez, R., and Steinbach, H. S. 2009. A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research, 104(1), 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.02.005.
    3. Armenise, E., Redmile-Gordon, M., Stellacci, A., Ciccarese, A., and Rubino, P. 2013. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 130 (1), 91-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.02.013.
    4. Boddey, R. M., Jantalia, C. P., Conceicao, P. C., Zanatta, J. A., Bayer, C., Mielniczuk, J., Dieckow, J., Dos Santos, H. P., Denardin, J. E., Aita, C. and Giacomini, S. J. 2010. Carbon accumulation at depth in Ferralsols under zero‐till subtropical agriculture. Global Change Biology, 16(2), 784-795, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02020.x..
    5. Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy journal, 54(5), 464-465, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
    6. Briones, M. J. I., and Schmidt, O. 2017. Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta‐Global change Biology, 23(10), 4396-4419, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13744.
    7. Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. C., Deyn, G. D., Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T., Mäder, P., Pulleman, M., Sukkel, W., Willem van Groenigen, J., and Brussaard. L. 2018. Soil quality – A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 120, 105-125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030.
    8. Busari, A. M., Kukal, S. S., Kaur, A., Bhatt, R., Dulazi, A. A. 2015. Conservation of tillage impacts on soil, crops and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation. Research, 3 (2), 119–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.05.002.
    9. Caires, E., Haliski, A., Bini, A., and Scharr, D. 2015. Surface liming and nitrogen fertilization for crop grain production under no-till management in Brazil. European Journal of Agronomy , 66, 41-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.02.008.
    10. Chivenge, P. P., Murwira, H. K., Giller, K. E., Mapfumo, P. and Six, J., 2007. Long-term impact of reduced tillage and residue management on soil carbon stabilization: Implications for conservation agriculture on contrasting soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 94(2), 328-337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.08.006.
    11. Cooper, H. V., Sjögersten, S., Lark, R. M., Mooney, S. J. 2021. To till or not to till in a temperate ecosystem? Implications for climate change mitigation. Environmental Research Letters. 16(5), 054022, https:// org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe74e.
    12. Das, S., Bhattacharyya, R., Das, T. K., Sharma, A. R, Dwivedi, B., Meena, M. C., Dey, A., Biswas, S., Aditya, K. and Aggarwal, P. 2021. Soil quality indices in a conservation agriculture-based rice-mustard cropping system in North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research, 208(2021), 104914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104914.
    13. Derpsch, R. 2008. No-tillage and conservation agriculture: a progress report. No-till farming systems. Special publication, 3, 7-39.
    14. Hickman, M.V. 2002. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on soil chemical and mineral properties. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 25(7), 1457-1470, https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120005402.
    15. Hiel, M. P., Barbieux, S., Pierreux, J., Olivier, C., Lobet, G., Roisin, C., Garré, S., Colinet, G., Bodson, B. and Dumont, B. 2018. Impact of crop residue management on crop production and soil chemistry after seven years of crop rotation in temperate climate, loamy soils. PeerJ, 6, ID: e4836‏. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4836.

     

    1. Ion V., Dicu G., Dumbravă M., Temocico G., Alecu I. N., Băşa A. G., State, D. 2015. Harvest Index at Maize in Different Growing Conditions. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 20 (6), 10951-10960.
    2. Jacobs, A. A., Evans, R. S., Allison, J. K., Garner, E. R., Kingery, W. L., & McCulley, R. L. 2022. Cover crops and no-tillage reduce crop production costs and soil loss, compensating for lack of short-term soil quality improvement in a maize and soybean production system. Soil and Tillage Research. 218: 105-111, https://doi.org/1016/j.still.2021.105310.
    3. Jat, R. A., Wani, S. P., Sahrawat, K. L. 2012. Conservation agriculture in the semi-arid tropics: prospects and problems. Advances in Agronomy. 117, 65–2113, https://doi.org/1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00004-0.
    4. Kassam, A. 2020. Advances in Conservation Agriculture: volume 2: practice and benefits. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited.
    5. Kazemi-nejad, R., Rezaee, A., Joolaie, R. and Keramatzadeh, A. 2022. Investigating the effects of water resources consumption reduction policies on agricultural sustainability in different climates in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26 (1), 1007-1032. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10668-022-02745-1
    6. Kiboi, M. N., Ngetich, F. K., Mucheru-Muna, M. W., Diels, J., and Mugendi, D. N. 2021. Soil nutrients and crop yield response to conservation-effective management practices in the sub-humid highlands agro-ecologies of Kenya. Heliyon, 7, ID: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2021.e07156
    7. Kladivko, E. J. 2001. Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil and Tillage Research. 61 (1-2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00179-9.
    8. Klik, A., Rosner, J. 2020. Long-term experience with conservation tillage practices in Austria: Impacts on soil erosion processes. Soil and Tillage Research. 203 (1) ID: 104669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104669.
    9. Kuldip Gosai, K. G., Ayyanadar Arunachalam, A. A. and Dutta, B. K. 2010. Tillage effects on soil microbial biomass in a rainfed agricultural system of northeast India. Soil and Tillage Research. 109(2), 68–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.04.006.
    10. Lal, R. 1998. Soil erosion impacts on agronomic productivity and environment quality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 17(4), 319-464, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689891304249.
    11. Lindsay, W. L., Norvell, W. A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil-test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(3), 421-428, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
    12. López-Fando, C. and Pardo, M.T. 2009. Changes in soil chemical characteristics with different tillage practices in a semi-arid environment. Soil and Tillage Research. 104(2), 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.03.005.
    13. Mayo, D.G. and Hand, D. 2022. Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?. Synthese, 200, 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03692-0

     

    1. Mousques, C., Friedrich, T. 2007. Conservation Agriculture in China and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. FAO crop and grassland service working paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
    2. Nelson, D. W., Sommers, L. E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-3, Chemical Methods (Ed.), DL Sparks, Madison, SSSA Book Series No. 5, SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 961-1010, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34.
    3. Ngwira, A. R., Aune, J. B. and Mkwinda, S. 2012. On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short-term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Research 132 (1), 149-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.014.
    4. Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W., Woomer, P. L. 2002. Laboratory methods for soil and plant analysis. A working manual second edition Sacred Africa, Nairobi, 21. pp: 25-26. https://doi.org/ 10.12691/aees-3-5-1
    5. Okeyo, I. A., Mucheru-Muna, M., Mugwe, J., Ngetich, K. F., Mugendi, D. N., Diels, J., Shisanya, C. A. 2014. Effects of selected soil and water conservation technologies on nutrient losses and maize yields in the central highlands of Kenya. Agricultural Water Management. 137(1), 52–58,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.014.
    6. Olsen, S. R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA, Circular-939, US. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
    7. Palm, C., Blanco-canqui, H., Declerck, F., Gatere, L., Grace, P. 2014. Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 187(1), 87–105,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010.
    8. Rasmussen, K. J. 1999. Impact of plough less soil tillage on yield and soil quality: a Scandinavian review. Soil and Tillage Research. 53(1), 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00072-0.
    9. Rhoades, J. D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids. In: Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T. and Sumner, M. E., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3, Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 5(1), 417-435, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14.
    10. Rowell, D. L. 1994. Soil science methods and applications. Longman Group, Harlow, p. 345.
    11. Shakoor, A., Shahbaz, M., Farooq, T. H., Sahar, N. E., Shahzad, S. M., Altaf, M. M., Ashraf, M. 2021. A global meta-analysis of greenhouse gases emission and crop yield under no-tillage as compared to conventional tillage. Science of the Total Environment. 750 (1), ID: 142299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142299.
    12. Smith, C. T., Dyck, W. J., Beets, P. N., Hodgkiss, P. D., Lowe, A. T. 1994. Nutrition and productivity of Pinus radiata following harvest disturbance and fertilization of coastal sand dunes. Forest Ecology and Management. 66 (1-3), 5-38, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90146-5.
    13. Souza, M., Júnior, V. M., Kurtz, C., dos Santos Ventura, B., Lourenzi, C. R., Lazzari, C. J. R., Ferreira, G.W., Brunetto, G., Loss, A. and Comin, J. J. 2021. Soil chemical properties and yield of onion crops grown for eight years under a no-tillage system with cover crops. Soil and Tillage Research. 208, ID: 104897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104897.
    14. TerAvest, D., Carpenter-Boggs, L., Thierfelder, C., Reganold, J. P. 2015. Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture. no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 212 (1), 285-296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.011.
    15. Thierfelder, C., Chisui, J.L., Gama, M., Cheesman, S., Jere, Z. D., Bunderson, W. T., Eash, N. S. and Rusinamhodzi, L. 2013. Maize-based conservation agriculture systems in Malawi: long-term trends in productivity. Field Crops Research, 142(1), 47-57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.010.
    16. Thomas, G. W. 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In: Sparks, D.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 475-490, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16.
    17. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. and Befort, B. L. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences, 108 (50), 20260-20264, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108.
    18. Tolessa, D., Du Preez, C. C., and Ceronio, G. M. 2014. Effect of tillage system and nitrogen fertilization on the pH, extractable phosphorus and exchangeable potassium of Nitisols in Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Agriculture Research, 9(35), 2669-2680, https://doi: 10.5897/AJAR2013.7779.
    19. Topa, D., Cara, I. G. and Jităreanu, G. 2021. Long term impact of different tillage systems on carbon pools and stocks, soil bulk density, aggregation and nutrients: A field meta-analysis. Catena, 199, 105102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105102.
    20. Tully, K., Sullivan, C., Weil, R., Sanchez, P. 2015. The state of soil degradation in sub-Saharan Africa: baselines, trajectories, and solutions. Sustainability. 7(6), 6523–6552, https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066523.
    21. Van Es, H. M. 1993. Evaluation of temporal, spatial and tillage induced variability for parameterization of soil infiltration. Geoderma 60(1-4), 187–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90026-H.
    22. Van Reeuwijk, L. P. 2002. Procedures for soil analysis. Technical Paper No. 9, 6th Edition, 2002, FAO/ISRIC, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 120 pp.
    23. Wang, X. and Gong, Z. 1998. Assessment and analysis of soil quality changes after eleven years of reclamation in subtropical China. Geoderma. 81 (3-4), 339-355, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00109-2.
    24. Zhang, L., Jiang, G., Xiao, R., Hou, K., Liu, X., Liu, X., and Han, Y. 2024. An appropriate amount of straw replaced chemical fertilizers returning reduced net greenhouse gas emissions and improved net ecological economic benefits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, ID: 140236,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140236.
    25. Zribi, W., Aragüés, R., Medina, E. and Faci, J. 2015. Efficiency of inorganic and organic mulching materials for soil evaporation control. Soil and Tillage Research, 148 (1), 40-45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.12.003.