Agricultural Engineering

Performance Evaluation of a Solar Dryer Equipped with Heat Pump and Collector with Flat Side Reflectors in Mint Drying Process

Document Type : Applicable

Authors

Mohamad reza Abbasi 1
Reza Tabatabaeekoloor 2
Jafar Hashemi 2
Ali Motevali 2

1 MSc student in Renewable energy, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University

2 Associate Professor., Department of Biosystem Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University

https://doi.org/10.22055/agen.2026.51055.1789
Abstract
Introduction: Drying is one of the most important post-harvest processes for medicinal plants, particularly for heat-sensitive species like peppermint (Mentha piperita). Currently, the common methods of drying medicinal plants in Iran are divided into two main categories: traditional methods (using direct sunlight) and industrial methods (using thermal dryers). Traditional methods face several limitations, including long drying time (4 to 7 days), exposure to environmental pollutants, insect and bird attacks, non-uniform humidity changes, and complete dependence on atmospheric conditions. On the other hand, industrial methods, although they have a higher drying speed, have significant energy consumption (2-3 kWh per kilogram of product) and are associated with greenhouse gas emissions and high operating costs. Traditional drying methods face challenges including high energy consumption, long processing times, and quality degradation. This research comprehensively investigates an innovative hybrid solar-assisted heat pump dryer integrated with flat side reflectors to address these limitations while promoting sustainable energy use in agricultural processing.

Materials and Methods: This research was conducted to evaluate the performance of a combined solar-heat pump dryer equipped with concentrating mirrors for drying mint leaves. The experimental system comprised four main components: a closed-cycle drying unit with heat pump recovery, a three-pass solar air collector, flat side reflectors, and an advanced monitoring and control system. The solar collector featured a black-painted aluminum absorber plate with triple-pass airflow configuration and eight aluminum fins at 48° angle. Two flat glass mirrors (0.96 m² each) were mounted at 60° angle for solar concentration. Comprehensive experiments were conducted using a factorial design with three primary factors: drying temperature (40, 50, 60°C), heat pump application (with/without), and flat side reflectors (with/without). Fresh peppermint leaves (100 g samples) were dried until reaching 15% moisture content (wet basis), with continuous monitoring of thermal parameters, energy consumption, and mass transfer kinetics. Various parameters including drying time, collector inlet and outlet air temperatures, drying chamber temperature, relative air humidity, solar radiation intensity and electrical energy consumption were measured. Performance indices including collector thermal efficiency, drying efficiency, specific moisture absorption rate and heat pump performance coefficient were calculated. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software and means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test at a significance level of 5%.

Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance of different experimental factors on the thermal efficiency of the solar collector showed that the effect of temperature, heat pump, flat side reflectors, and the interaction effect of temperature and heat pump, temperature and concentrating mirrors, and temperature and heat pump and mirror on the drying time was statistically significant at the 1% level. The results of the study showed that the use of concentrating mirrors and heat pumps had a significant impact on improving the thermal efficiency of the solar collector. The average efficiency of the solar collector without the use of flat side reflectors was measured at 29.7%, while with the use of concentrating mirrors this value increased to 36%. The use of a heat pump alone also increased the thermal efficiency of the collector by 10%. The highest thermal efficiency was related to the treatment at 40 ° C in the case of using flat side reflectors, which was measured at 49.1 and 48.5% in the two conditions of using and not using a heat pump, respectively. The integrated system demonstrated remarkable performance improvements. Simultaneous application of heat pump and flat side reflectors achieved an 84.5% reduction in drying time (from 240 to 37 minutes) and 65.3% enhancement in collector thermal efficiency. The flat side reflectors individually contributed to 21.2% improvement in thermal efficiency, while the heat pump alone provided 10.1% efficiency gain. Maximum drying efficiency of 6.08% and superior SMER of 0.087 kg/kWh were obtained at 60°C with both subsystems operational. Energy consumption analysis revealed 61.2% reduction under optimal conditions. The enhanced performance is attributed to improved heat transfer through flat side reflectors and efficient energy recovery via the heat pump system, which reduced relative humidity and increased drying potential.

Conclusion: The hybrid solar-heat pump dryer with flat side reflectors presents a technologically advanced and environmentally sustainable solution for medicinal plant processing. The system achieves substantial reductions in drying time and energy consumption while maintaining product quality through controlled temperature conditions. This research contributes to sustainable agriculture by demonstrating the practical integration of renewable energy technologies for food and pharmaceutical applications, with potential for significant economic and environmental benefits in medicinal plant processing industries.























All right reserved.

Keywords

Solar dryer
Heat pump
Flat side reflectors
Mint
Subjects
  1. Prusinowska, R. and Smigielski, K. 2015. Losses of essential oils and antioxidants during the drying of herbs and spices - A review. Engineering Science and Technology, 2(17): 51–62. https://doi: 10.15611/nit.2015.2.05
  2. Chakraborty, R. and Dey, T. 2016. Drying protocols for traditional medicinal herbs: a critical review. International Journal of Engineering Technology, Management and Applied Sciences, 4(4):311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1765309
  3. Hasan, M.U., Malik, A.U., Ali, S., Imtiaz, A., Munir, A., and Amjad, W. 2019. Modern drying techniques in fruits and vegetables to overcome postharvest losses: A review. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(12):e14280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14280
  4. Omisbeygi, R. 2005. Production and processing of medicinal plants. Tird edition, Astan Ghods Publications, Mshhad, Iran. (In Persian)
  5. Hedayat, M., Mortezapour, H., and Shamsi, M. 2015. Investigating the performance of solar dryer equipped with a thermal recycle for mint drying. Iranian Biosystem Engineering, 46(4): 379-388. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  6. Loolaie, M., Moasefi, N., Rasouli, H., and Adibi, H. 2017. Peppermint and its functionality: A review. Archieve Clinical Microbiology, 8(4):54-67. https://doi:10.4172/1989-8436.100053
  7. Djamila, B., Zohra, K.F., Lahcene, K., and Zohra, R.F. 2021. Drying methods affect the extracts and essential oil of Mentha aquatica L. Food Bioscience, 41:101007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101007
  8. Khallaf, A.E. and El-Sebaii, A.A. 2022. Review on drying of the medicinal plants (herbs) using solar energy applications. Heat Mass Transfer, 58(8):1411–1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03191-5
  9. Walsh, M.J., Gerber, L., Shete, N., Prakash, A. and Salim, U. 2018. Financial tradeoffs of energy and food uses of algal biomass under stochastic conditions. Applied Energy, 210:591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.060
  10. El Hage, H., Herez, A., Ramadan, M., Bazzi, H. and Khaled, M. 2018. An investigation on solar drying: a review with economic and environmental assessment. Energy 157:815–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.197
  11. Sabziparvar, A.A. and Shetaee, H. 2007. Estimation of global solar radiation in arid and semi-arid climates of East and West Iran. Energy 32(5):649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.005
  12. Mokhtarian, M., Tavakolipour, H. and Kalbasi-Ashtari, A. 2016. Energy and exergy analysis of a solar dryer for mint leaves. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 40(6):1214–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.067 (In Persian with English Abstract).
  13. Chua, K.J. and Chou, S.K. 2003. Low-cost drying methods for developing countries. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 14(12):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.07.003
  14. Amanlou, Y., Tavakoli, T., Ghobadian, B. and Najafi, G. 2013. Design of solar concentrators to increase intensity of radiation on the photovoltaic panel. 8th National Biosystem Congress, Mashhad, (In Persian with English Abstract).
  15. Şevik, S. 2014. Experimental investigation of a new design solar-heat pump dryer under the different climatic conditions and drying behavior of selected products. Solar Energy, 105:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.03.037
  16. Mortezapour, H., and Shamsi, M. 2015. Investigation the performance of solar dryer equipped with a thermal recycle for mint drying. Iranian Biosystem Engineering, 46(4): 379-388. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2024.90300.1298 (In Persian with English Abstract).
  17. Bahmanpour, H., Sajadie, S.M., Sheykhdavoodi, M. and Zolfaghari, M. 2015. Comparison of mint drying in solar and vaccum dryer. The 3rd National Conference on Agriculture and Environment. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  18. Amanlou, Y., Tavakoli, T., Ghobadian, B. and Najafi, G. 2013. Design of solar concentrators to increase intensity of radiation on the photovoltaic panel. 8th National Biosystem Congress, Mashhad. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  19. Akpinar, E.K. 2010. Drying of mint leaves in a solar dryer and under open sun: modelling, performance analyses. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(12):2407–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.05.005
  20. Yahya, M., Fudholi, A., Hafizh, H., and Sopian, K. 2016. Comparison of solar dryer and solar-assisted heat pump dryer for cassava. Solar Energy, 136:606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.07.049
  21. Şevik, S., Aktaş, M., Dolgun, E.C., Arslan, E. and Tuncer, A.D. 2019. Performance analysis of solar and solar-infrared dryer of mint and apple slices using energy-exergy methodology. Solar Energy, 180:537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.049
  22. Kesavan, S., Arjunan, T.V., and Vijayan, S. 2019. Thermodynamic analysis of a triple-pass solar dryer for drying potato slices. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 136(1):159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7747-0
  23. Murali, G., Sundari, A.T., Raviteja, S., Chanukyachakravarthi, S. and Tejpraneeth, M. 2020. Experimental study of thermal performance of solar aluminium cane air heater with and without fins. Materials Today Proceedings, 21:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.224
  24. Ezeike, G.O. 1986. Development and performance of a triple-pass solar collector and dryer system. Energy in Agriculture, 5:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5826(86)90002-1
  25. Kishor, P.U. and Raut, P. 2023. Design and fabrication of multi-purpose solar dryer with mirror. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 12(5): 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1006/j.ert.2023.01.065
  26. Salah, S.B., Benseddik, A., Meneceur, N., Zine, A. and Deghoum, K. 2024. Design and realization of a new solar dryer assisted by a parabolic trough concentrator (PTC) with a dual-axis solar tracker. Solar Energy, 283:113001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2024.113001
  27. Gill, R.S., Singh, S., and Singh, P.P. 2012. Low cost solar air heater. Energy Conversion and Management, 57:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.12.019
  28. Shanmugam, V., and Natarajan, E. 2007. Experimental study of regenerative desiccant integrated solar dryer with and without reflective mirror. Applied Thermal Engineering 27(8):1543–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.09.018
  29. Tiris, C., Tiris, M. and Dincer, I. 1996. Experiments on a new small-scale solar dryer. Applied Thermal Engineering, 16(3):183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-4311(95)00048-I
  30. Kishk, S.S., Abd El‑Reheem, S.S. and ElGamal, R. A. 2018. Experimental and mathematical modeling study for solar drying of mint (Mentha spicata L.). Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 35(4), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2018.95279
  31. Téllez, M.C., Castillo‑Téllez, B., Pérez Gerardo, A.M., Marzoug, R. and Álvarez, D.C. 2021. Design of an indirect dryer with coupling of solar collectors and its thermal characterization by drying the mint leaves (Mentha spicata). European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p411
  32. Kaveh, M., Zomorodi, S., Mariusz, S. and Dziwulska‑Hunek, A. 2024. Determination of drying characteristics and physicochemical properties of mint (Mentha spicata L.) leaves dried in Refractance Window. Foods, 13(18), 2867. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182867
  33. Kannan, V.S., Arjunan, T.V. and Vijayan, S.(2022. Drying characteristics of mint leaves (Mentha arvensis) dried in a solid desiccant dehumidifier system. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 58(2): 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04595-z
  34. Moradi, M., Fallahi, M.A., and Mousavi Khaneghah, A. 2020. Kinetics and mathematical modeling of thin layer drying of mint leaves by a hot water recirculating solar dryer. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13181
  35. Amanlou, Y., Tavakkoli Hashjin, T., Ghobadian, B. and Najafi, G. 2013. Design of a solar concentrator to increase radiation intensity on a photovoltaic panel. In Proceedings of the 8th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering (Biosystems) and Mechanization of Iran, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian with English Abstract).
  36. Vieira, M.G.A., Estrella, L. and Rocha, S.C.S. 2007. Energy Efficiency and Drying Kinetics of Recycled Paper Pulp. Drying Technology, 25:1639-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930701590806
  37. Wang, W., Li, M., Hassanien, R.H.E., Wang, Y., and Yang, L. 2018. Thermal performance of indirect forced convection solar dryer and kinetics analysis of mango. Applied Thermal Engineering, 134:310–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01. 115.
  38. Biondi, P., Cicala, L., and Farina, G. 1988. Performance analysis of solar air heaters of conventional design. Solar Energy, 41, 101-107
  39. Bala, B.K., Hoque, M.A., Hossain, M.A. and Uddin, M. 2010. Drying characteristics of asparagus roots (Asparagus racemosus Wild.). Drying Technology, 28(4): 533- 544. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373931003618899
  40. Singh, P. and Pandey, J.P. 2011. Experimental investigation of the performance of a solar dryer with natural convection. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3(5):4055–63. https://doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.10.011
  41. Sarkar, J., Bhattacharyya, S. and Ramgopal, M. 2006. Heat pump dryer: Part 1. Experimental results. Drying Technology, 24(12):1593–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-114
  42. Shanmugam, V. and Natarajan, E. 2007. Experimental study of regenerative desiccant integrated solar dryer with and without reflective mirror. Applied Thermal Engineering 27(9):1543–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.09.018
  43. Motevali, A., Hashemi, J., and Kiani, R. 2022. Investigating the thermodynamic parameters and microwave pretreatment in rosmary drying. Energy Management and Engineering, 7(2): 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eme.2022.05.013
  44. Sarkar, J., Bhattacharyya, S. and Ramgopal, M. 2006. CO2 heat pump dryer: Part 2. Validation and simulation results. Drying Technology, 24: 1642-1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930601030945.
  45. Razmipour, M., Alavi, N., Mortezapour, H., and Ghazanfari, A. 2015. Evaluation of solar dryer performance equipped with concentrator with drying air control system. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 5(2): 16-23. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v5i1.26691 (In Persian with English Abstract).

 

Agricultural Engineering
Volume 48, Issue 4
December
Autumn 2026
Pages 662-647

Home

Submit Manuscript

Editorial Staff

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Guide for Authors

Article Processing Charges

Reviewers

contact us