Investigation and Evaluation of Qualitative and Quantitative Parameters in Paddy Conversion Systems in Khuzestan Province

Document Type : Applicable

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Khuzestan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Rice is a staple food for over half of the global population and stands as the second most consumed food product in Iran. Its production is increasing, particularly in Khuzestan province, which nonetheless confronts significant challenges in the post-harvest process. Many rice mills employ traditional technologies that result in substantial losses during the conversion of paddy to white rice, consequently escalating overall costs. These losses inflict considerable economic damage on farmers, and mitigating them-especially given limited water resources- is crucial for boosting domestic output and reducing import dependency. The milling stage, encompassing husking and whitening, is the most sensitive, accounting for the highest rate of grain breakage, which directly affects the product’s economic value. The quality of milled rice, quantified by its whiteness degree, is highly valued in Iran, where the recovered head rice yield is the most critical determinant of paddy price. Modern technologies, such as abrasive whiteners, demonstrate superior efficiency compared to traditional systems, capable of minimizing waste and grain breakage. This research investigates the performance of dominant conversion systems in Khuzestan and proposes practical solutions for waste reduction by focusing on key technical parameters.

Materials and Methods: This study aimed to investigate and compare rice conversion systems operating within Khuzestan province. Three distinct rice milling conversion systems were selected: Type A (Conventional), comprising a grain cleaner, a blade-type husker, two parallel blade whiteners, and a grader; Type B (Simple Imported), consisting of a destoner, grain cleaner, rubber roller husker, paddy separator, abrasive whitener, and polisher; and Type C (Advanced Imported), similar to type B but equipped with two serial abrasive whiteners. The specifications and processing stages of their equipment were examined. Paddy samples of the Anbarbo, the region’s dominant cultivar, were dried to a moisture content of 8.9%, then divided into three batches and processed in the three type mills under study. Sampling was conducted at the output of various machines, and system evaluation parameters, including impurity levels, husking percentage, breakage, conversion efficiency, head rice percentage, whiteness degree, and cooking quality properties, were analyzed in the laboratory. The experimental design followed a randomized complete block design with three treatments and three replications. Data analysis was performed using MSTATC software, employing Duncan and LSD tests at a 5% significance level. This rigorous approach ensured accurate evaluation and comparison of the different milling systems to provide actionable solutions for process improvement and waste reduction.

Results and Discussion: Rice mill type C exhibited the lowest impurity levels due to its two-stage grain cleaning process. Rice mill type A, utilizing the blade-type whitener, registered the highest breakage rate, whereas mill type C with its abrasive system yielded the lowest breakage. The use of abrasive systems is recommended for starchy texture cultivar. No significant difference was found in conversion efficiency among the mills, suggesting either improper use or inappropriate settings of the imported systems for local cultivars. Conversion efficiencies for mills A, B, and C were 67.1%, 68.2%, and 66.8%, respectively. Mills B and C, equipped with polishers, achieved a higher degree of whiteness compared to mill A. The type of mill had no significant effect on amylose content, gelatinization, or grain elongation ratio. The amylose percentage in rice from mills A, B, and C was 22.4%, 21.2%, and 22.1%, respectively. Amylose content significantly influences the physical and chemical properties of rice, ultimately affecting its quality and suitability. The gelatinization degree for rice from mills A and B was 4.6, while it was 4.7 for type C. The grain elongation ratio after cooking was 1.7 for type A and 1.8 for the other two types. Based on these results, utilizing mills B and C for processing the Anbarbo cultivar and similar cultivars in Khuzestan province is preferable to traditional mills. Therefore, for processing Anbarbo rice in this region, the use of rubber roller huskers and abrasive whiteners is recommended over blade huskers.

Conclusion: This research investigated the effect of rice mill type on the quality and quantity of rice in Khuzestan province. The results indicated that the type of mill significantly impacts paddy impurity levels, rice breakage, and the degree of whiteness, whereas conversion efficiency and other key quality characteristics of rice remained unaffected. Mills equipped with superior machinery, such as two-stage grain cleaners and abrasive whiteners, yield higher quality rice. Therefore, the correct selection of rice milling equipment, particularly huskers and whiteners, is crucial for improving rice quality and reducing waste. Specifically, the use of rubber roller huskers is recommended for processing the Anbarbo cultivar.

Keywords

Subjects

  1.  

    1. Afzalinia, S., Shaker, M. and Zare, E. 2004. Comparison of different rice milling methods. Canadian biosystems engineering, 46(3):63-66. DOI: https://library.csbe-scgab.ca/docs/journal/46/c0244.pdf.
    2. 2023. Agricultural Statistics, Volume 1: Crops. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. 323 (in Persian).
    3. Aquerreta, J., Iguaz, A., Arroqui, C., and Virseda, P. 2007. Effect of high temperature intermittent drying and tempering on rough rice quality. Journal of Food Engineering, 80: 611-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.06.012.
    4. Aung, Y. 2017. Food Losses in Rice Milling, Crop Improvement. Springer, Cham.
    5. Bao, J. 2019. Rice milling quality. In Rice. AACC International Press.
    6. Bodie, A. R., Micciche, A. C., Atungulu, G. G., Rothrock Jr, M. J., and Ricke, S. C. 2019. Current trends of rice milling byproducts for agricultural applications and alternative food production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3(47):1-13. DOI: 3389/fsufs.2019.00047.
    7. Donlao, N. 2023. Postharvest Processing of Rice, Science of Rice Chemistry and Nutrition. Springer, Singapore.
    8. 2023. Rice Market Monitor. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
    9. Gazor, H., Alizadeh, M., and Younesi, M. 2016. Comparison of operational parameters and energy consumption in rice milling systems (Case Study in Mazandaran Province). Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 17(66): 15-28 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2016.106415.
    10. Gazor, H.R., and Moumeni, A. 2019. Comparison of the paddy drying process and milling quality between re-circulating and conventional batch type dryers. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 9(2): 365-374 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v9i2.72761.
    11. Ghasemi Varnamkhasti, M., Mobli, H., Jafari, A., Heidari Soltanabadi, M., and Rafiee, S.H. 2008. Investigation of Rice Quality of Sorkheh Variety Using a Rotor Equipped with Screw Conveyor in Blade Whitener. Isfahan University of Technology-Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 12(44): 257-266 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI: 1001.1.24763594.1387.12.44.20.5.
    12. Gourabjiri, M., Firouzi, S., and, Aminoanah, H. 2017. Analysis of Factors Affecting Rice Breakage Losses in Guilan Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47(4):747-760 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI: 1001.1.20084803.1395.47.4.17.4.
    13. Habibi Asl, J., and Kavoosi-Balootaki, J. 2019. Technical Evaluation and Efficiency of two Solar Collector Types for Paddy Drying in Khuzestan Province. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 20(72):91-108, (in Persian with English abstract). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2018.110975.1201.
    14. Habibi Asl, J., Loveimi, N., and Gilani, A. A. 2009. Mechanized Dry Seeding Methods for Rice in Khuzestan. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 10(1): 81-96, (in Persian with English abstract). DOI:  1001.1.26454531.1388.10.1.6.8
    15. Heidariesoltanabadi, M., Malek, S., Ghazvini, H.R., Shaaker, M., and Hedayatizadeh, M. 2010. Losses in blade and abrasive systems by moisture content for three rice varieties. Food Engineering Research, 11(1):67-84 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI: 1001.1.26454531.1389.11.1.5.4.
    16. 2022. World Rice Statistics. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute
    17. Kalpanadevi, C., Singh, V., and Subramanian, R. 2019. Impact of physicoc-hemical properties on duration and head rice yield during abrasive and friction milling of rice. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56(8): 3900-3909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03861-z.
    18. Mohapatra, D., and Bal, S. 2007. Effect of degree of milling on specific energy consumption, optical measurements and cooking quality of rice. Journal of Food Engineering, 80(1): 119-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.055.
    19. Qu, X., Kojima, D., Wu, L. and Ando, M. 2021. The losses in the rice harvest process: A review. Sustainability, 13(17): 9627. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179627.
    20. Saikia, D., and Deka S.C. 2011. Cereals: from staple food to nutraceuticals. International Food Research Journal, 18(1): 21-30.
    21. Shaker, M. 2006. Determination of the most proper of paddy prevalent varieties moisture content range during milling in Fars province. Research report No. 85.1345. Agricultural engineering research institute. Karaj (in Persian with English abstract).
    22. Shaker, M., Rahimi, H., Shahamirian, M., and Alavimanesh, S.M. 2017. Technical, Economical and Nutritional Evaluation of Different Long Kernel Rice Milling Methods in Fars Province. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 48(2): 315-323 (in Persian with English abstract). DOI:  22059/ijbse.2017.62473.
    23. Shwetha, M.K., Mahajanashetti, S.B., and Kerur, N.M. 2011. Economics of paddy processing: a comparative analysis of conventional and modern rice mills.  Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences,  24 (3): 331-335.
    24. Singh, V., Lal, G.M. and Devi, S.V., 2019. Studies on genetic divergence in rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 10(4): 1593-1599. DOI: 10.5958/0975-928X.2019.00205.9.
    25. Tajaddoditalab, K., Latifi, A., Alizadeh, M.R., Habibi, F., and Tavasoli, V. 2013. Effect of dryer temperature, final paddy moisture content and whitener on head rice and cooking quality of some Iranian rice varieties. Research report No. 44952. Rice research Institute of Iran. (in Persian).
    26. Tajaditalab, K. 2002. The effect of pre-steaming on the drying and conversion efficiency of rice paddy. Rice Research Institute of Iran (in Persian).
    27. Tie, X. Y., An, N. N., Li, D., Wang, L. J., and Wang, Y. 2024. Recent advances in rice milling technology: effect on nutrient, physical properties and digestibility. Food Reviews International, 40(8): 2256-2282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2023.2272932.
    28. Tuncel, N. Y., Andac, A. E., Kaya, H. P., and Tuncel, N. B. 2025. The impact of milling degree on physicochemical, nutritional, rheological, textural properties, and in vitro digestibility of rice: From brown rice to white rice. Food Chemistry, 464, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141795.
    29. Yehia, M. E., and Katab, A. R. 2018. Effect of Hulling Machines on Hulling Characteristics and Quality of Rice Grains. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 35(1): 259-274. DOI:  21608/mjae.2018.96055.