Identification of the Factors Affecting Iron Release Kinetics in Some Calcareous Soils of Orange (Citrus sinensis L.) Orchards at Darab Region, Southern Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Darab region is one of the most important citrus production hubs, especially oranges, in Fars province. Given the frequent reports of iron deficiency chlorosis in citrus grown in calcareous soils of Iran, which reduces fruit production and quality, a better understanding of the mechanisms and kinetics of iron release from soil can provide useful information about its bioavailability and the factors affecting it and help us take the necessary measures to optimize soil conditions to prevent iron deficiency in plants and increase its availability in the soil. The aim of the present study is to investigate the kinetics of iron release in some calcareous soils of orange orchards (Citrus sinensis L.) in the Darab region, southern Iran, using six mathematical kinetic models and to find the effective soil characteristics in the release of iron from the solid phase to the soil solution.

Materials and Methods: 21 Washington Novel orange orchards (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) grafted onto orange (Citrus aurantium) rootstock were selected from different locations in Darab region in southeastern Fars Province through field observations and aerial photo analysis. Soil sampling was carried out from the selected tree bases and their shaded areas in four different directions (from 0 to 30 cm depth) in the vicinity of the drippers. Thus, a total of 10 soil samples were selected with different physical and chemical properties. The kinetics of iron release study was carried out using DTPA solution at pH 7.3 as the extractant, which was as follows: 10 g of each of the three soil sample replicates were placed in a 50 ml centrifuge tube and extracted with 20 ml of DTPA solution on a shaker (120 rpm) for 0.083, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours at 25 ± 2°C. After shaking, the samples were immediately centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4000 rpm and the supernatant was passed through Whatman filter paper No. 42. The iron concentration in the resulting solution was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry (PG 990, PG Instruments Ltd. UK). The cumulative concentration of released iron (q) was evaluated as a function of time (t) using six different kinetic models. Relatively high values of the coefficient of determination (R2) and low values of the standard error of estimate (SEE) were used as criteria for selecting the best models. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software.

Results and Discussion: The pattern of iron release in all soil samples was similar and consisted of a short-term rapid phase (fast phase) and a long-term slow phase (slow phase), so that about 44% (on average) of the total iron released during 48 hours was desorbed in the first two hours. Therefore, this result can confirm the two-stage iron release process from the soil samples. The highest iron release content within 48 hours was observed in soil "A" (17.3 mg kg-1), which could be due to the fact that among the studied soils, the highest organic matter content (7%), cation exchange capacity (2.15 meq 100 g-1 soil) and total iron (7560 mg kg-1) were found in soil A. The power function, parabolic diffusion, and simple Elovich kinetic models had the highest R2 values and the lowest SEE values among the kinetic models, respectively. In the power function kinetic model, the value of the constant “a” ranged from 0.829 to 1.260 with a mean of 1.02, while these values for the constant “b” ranged from 0.23 to 0.30 with a mean of 0.25. The KP constant in the parabolic diffusion kinetic model represents the rate coefficient of iron diffusion (mg Fe kg-1h-0.5) from the solid phase to the soil solution. Among the studied soils, the highest and lowest KP values were for soil A (0.399) and soil B (0.198), respectively.

Conclusion: The soil properties such as organic matter, cation exchange capacity, pH, salinity, percentage of sand, silt and clay (soil texture) were effective on the rate of iron release from calcareous soils, while the total soil iron and equivalent calcium carbonate had no effect on iron release. Soil organic matter and percentage of sand had a positive and significant correlation with the rate of iron release in the soil from the solid phase to the soil solution, while there was a significant negative correlation between the rate of iron release and soil salinity, pH, percentage of silt and clay. Finally, it is suggested that management methods, including creating lighter soil texture by adding sand and reducing salinity (leaching) of calcareous soils under orange cultivation in the Darab region, can significantly contribute to the release of native soil iron from the solid phase to the soil solution, and consequently improve iron nutrition.

Keywords

Subjects

  1. Banaei, M. 1998. Soil moisture and temperature regimes map of Iran. Soil and Water Research Institute. In: Ministry of Agriculture Tehran. (In Persian).
  2. Barani Motlagh, M., and Towfighi, H. 2010. Comparison of Kinetic Equations to Describe Release of Iron from Some Calcareous Soils. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 40: 43-50. https://doi.org/1001.1.2008479.1388.40.1.6.8 (In persian with English abstract)
  3. Behera, P. R., Thiyagarajan, C., P, M., Uthandi, S., and P, I. V. 2022. Release kinetics of Iron (Fe) from soil and growing media mixtures: an incubation study. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 53(11): 1334-1354. https://doi.org/1080/00103624.2022.2046031.
  4. Bolan, N., Srivastava, P., Rao, C. S., Satyanaraya, P., Anderson, G. C., Bolan, S., Nortjé, G. P., Kronenberg, R., Bardhan, S., and Abbott, L. K. 2023. Distribution, characteristics and management of calcareous soils. Advances in agronomy, 182: 81-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2023.06.002.
  5. Boostani, H., Hardie, A., Najafi-Ghiri, M., and Khalili, D. 2018. Investigation of cadmium immobilization in a contaminated calcareous soil as influenced by biochars and natural zeolite application. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(11): 2433-2446. https://doi.org/1007/s13762-017-1544-3.
  6. Boostani, H. R., Hardie, A. G., Najafi-Ghiri, M., Bijanzadeh, E., Khalili, D., and Farrokhnejad, E. 2024. Investigating the synergistic potential Si and biochar to immobilize soil Ni in a contaminated calcareous soil after Zea mays L. cultivation. Soil, 4:1-21. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-487-2024.
  7. Boostani, H. R., Najafi-Ghiri, M., Amin, H., and Mirsoleimani, A. 2019. Zinc desorption kinetics from some calcareous soils of orange (Citrus sinensis L.) orchards, southern Iran. Soil science and Plant Nutrition, 65(1): 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2018.1554951
  8. Bowichean, R., Bell, R. W., Cheng, M., Thanachit, S., and Anusontpornperm, S. 2024. Release Kinetics of Boron in Acidic Soils as Affected by Calcium Form Different Sources. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 30: 6418954. https://doi.org/10.1155/aess/6418954
  9. Chapman, H. 1965. Cation Exchange Capacity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, edited by A. L. Page et al., pp. 1201-1229. American Society of Agronomy.
  10. Dahiya, S. S., and Singh, M. 1979. Effect of salinity, alkalinity and iron sources on availability of iron. Plant and Soil, 51: 13-18.‏
  11. Dalal, R. 1985. Comparative prediction of yield response and phosphorus uptake from soil using anion-and cation-anion-exchange resins. Soil Science, 139(3): 227-231.
  12. Dang, Y., Dalal, R., Edwards, D., and Tiller, K. 1994. Kinetics of zinc desorption from Vertisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(5): 1392-139. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050016x.
  13. Gee, G., and Bauder, J. 1986. Hydrometer method. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part, 1, 404-408.
  14. Havlin, J. L., Westfall, D. G., and Olsen, S. R. 1985. Mathematical models for potassium release kinetics in calcareous soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49(2), 371-376. https://doi.org/1080/15324982.2013.799615.
  15. Hejazi, M. 2018. The effects of oxalic acid on zinc release kinetic from some saline soils of pistachio growing area (Kerman province). Agricultural Engineering, 41(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.22055/agen.2018.16979.1258 (In persian with English abstract).
  16. Islam, R., Barman, D., Dash, G., Kabir, M., and Sabur, M. 2022. Iron cycling in coastal agricultural soil: effects of salinity and redox conditions. International Conference on Environmental Protection for Sustainable Development (ICEPSD-2022)
  17. Jalali, M., Majeri, M., and Najafi, S. 2019. Kinetic release and fractionation of cobalt in some calcareous soils. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 204: 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.02.006
  18. Kabiri, P., Hosseinpur, A.R., Motaghian, H.R., and Iranipour, R. 2024. Modeling the kinetic equations in describing the release rate of lead in a naturally contaminated calcareous soil treated with different, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 55 (5), 815-832 22059/ijswr.2024.370481.669639 (In Persian with English abstract).
  19. Karim, K., Sheikh-Abdullah, S., and Ali, S. 2020. Kinetics of copper release in some calcareous soils from Sulaimani governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 20(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjas.20.1.1.
  20. Liu, X., Sun, D., Qin, J., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Yang, J., and Yu, J. 2022. Spatial distribution of soil iron across different plant communities along a hydrological gradient in the Yellow River Estuary wetland. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 979194.‏ https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.979194.
  21. Lindsay, W. L., and Norvell, W. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(3): 421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  22. Loeppert, R. H., and Suarez, D. L. 1996. Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 437-474.
  23. López-Pérez, M. C., Espinoza-Acosta, J. L., and Pérez-Labrada, F. 2024. Iron nutrition management in calcisol soils as a tool to mitigate chlorosis and promote crop quality–An overview. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 12(1): 17-29. https://doi.org/7324/JABB.2024.157536.
  24. Mousavi, S. M., Srivastava, A., and Raiesi, T. 2024. Citrus nutrition in Iran: lessons from calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 47(19): 3367-3392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2379571.
  25. Nelson, D. W., and Sommers, L. E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 961-1010. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34
  26. Pajohannia, M., Chorom, M., and Jafari, S. 2016. The Effect of Water Table Fluctuation and its Salinity on Fe Crystal and Noncrystal in some Khuzestan Soils. Water and Soil, 30(5): 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.35151 (In Persian with English abstract).
  27. Pavlatou, A., and Polyzopoulos, N. A. 1988. The role of diffusion in the kinetics of phosphate desorption: the relevance of the Elovich equation. Journal of Soil Science, 39(3), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1988.tb01228.x.
  28. Reyhanitabar, A. 2014a. Kinetics of DTPA Extraction of Iron from Some Calcareous Soils of Iran. Water and Soil Science, 21(1): 71-83 (In persian with English abstract).
  29. Reyhanitabar, A. 2014b. Kinetics of Manganese Release From Some Calcareous Soils of Iran. Water and Soil Science, 20(2):131-142 (In persian with English abstract).
  30. Reyhanitabar, A., Ardalani, M., Gilkes, R., and Savaghebi, G. 2010. Zinc sorption characteristics of some selected calcareous soils of Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12: 99-110.
  31. Reyhanitabar, A., and Gilkes, R. 2010. Kinetics of DTPA extraction of zinc from calcareous soils. Geoderma, 154(3-4): 289-293. https://doi.org/1016/j.geoderma.2009.10.016.
  32. Rhoades, J. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 417-435. https://doi.org/ 10.2136/msa2015.0039
  33. Rout, G. R., and Sahoo, S. 2015. Role of iron in plant growth and metabolism. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 3: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.3.1.
  34. Safarzadeh, S., Kasmaei, S. L., and Ahmad, A. Z. 2018. Effect of organic substances on iron-release kinetics in a calcareous soil after basil harvesting. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 83(7-8): 941-952. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC171115019S.
  35. Sparks, D. L., Singh, B., and Siebecker, M. G. 2022. Environmental soil chemistry. Academic press, 3rd edition, Elsevier, 464 pp.
  36. Taghdis, S., Hejazi Mehrizi, M., and Jalali, V. 2016. Effect of oxalic and citric acids on zinc release kinetic in two calcareous soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 47(22): 2479-2489. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1254789
  37. Thomas, G. W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 475-490. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16.
  38. Umoh, F., Uduak, I., and Ekanem, C. 2024. Potassium Release Kinetics as Influenced by Time and Parent Materials in Parts of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 10(10): 233-240. https://doi.org/10.26765/DRJAFS.
  39. Zahedifar, M., Karimian, N., and Yasrebi, J. 2010. Zinc desorption of calcareous soils as influenced by applied zinc and phosphorus and described by eight kinetic models. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 41(7): 897-907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103621003592408.