بررسی کاربرد بازتاب‌سنجی و رنگ خاک سطحی بر تفکیک سطوح در معرض فرسایش خندقی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه خاکشناسی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه خاکشناسی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 مربی گروه خاکشناسی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده
رنگ خاک به عنوان یکی از ویژگی‌های ظاهری خاک‌ها است که با توجه به اثرگذاری بر روی بازتاب‌های سطح خاک می‌تواند جهت ارزیابی رفتارهای خاک مورد استفاده قرار بگیرد. در پژوهش حاضر امکان بهره-گیری از شاخص‌های کمی شده رنگ خاک سطحی (RGB) با استفاده از سنجش از دور و رفتار طیفی بازتابی جهت تفکیک سطوح فرسایشی و رسوبی در حوضه‌ی ظهیریه‌ی استان خوزستان بررسی شد. نتایج نشان داد که شاخص‌های کمی شده‌ی رنگ خاک سطحی (20-0 سانتیمتر) در حالت خشک قادر به تفکیک سطوح فرسایشی و رسوبی هستند (سطح 1درصد). همچنین نمودار میانگین بازتاب‌های زیراتمسفری سطوح فرسایشی و رسوبی نشان می‌دهد که بازتاب‌های سطوح رسوبی خصوصا در طول موج‌های 1400، 1900 و 2100 نانومتر کمتر از سطوح فرسایشی است که علت آن وجود باندهای هیدروکسیل (OH) در خاک سطحی و در نتیجه بافت سنگین‌تر و تجمع ماده آلی بیشتر است. نتایج مقایسه‌ی میانگین باندهای ماهواره لندست 8 نشان می‌دهد باندهای 2، 3 و 4 در سطح 1 درصد قادر به تفکیک سطوح فرسایشی و رسوبی هستند. نتایج این بررسی نشان می‌دهد باندهای حرارتی نمی‌توانند جهت تفکیک سطوح فرسایشی از رسوبی استفاده شوند. نتایج این بررسی نشان می‌دهدکه با توجه به تفاوت در ویژگی‌های رنگی سطوح فرسایشی و رسوبی در نتیجه امکان تفکیک آنها بر اساس ویژگی‌های بازتاب‌سنجی وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the use of Reflectometry and surface soil color for separation of surfaces exposed to gully erosion

نویسندگان English

Mitra Yarahmadi 1
Ataallah Khademalrasoul 2
hadi Amerikhah 3
1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
2 Associate Professor of Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Soil erosion is the most prevailing form of soil degradation which is really play an important role on the mass balance index of soil particles in the watersheds. Moreover, regarding the on-site and off-site effects of erosion essentially has to measure and predict the soil loss using different methods. Specifically gully erosion is a form of water erosion with the huge amount of soil dislodgement. Due to the complexity and variability of soil erosion it is necessary to apply different techniques in order to monitor the soil erosion changes. Remote sensing technology and the use of spectrometry and reflectometry basics is a suitable solution and option for monitoring coastal areas affected by erosion and deposition events, which provide high quality temporal and spatial data. Soil color is an appearance property which is meaningfully effective on soil reflectance. Generally, soils with high amount of organic matter has low reflectance because of the darkness while the light soils has high reflectance from surface (high Brightness index, BI) which is effective on soil temperature. Therefore we try to use RS and radio spectrophotometry to find a relation between soil color and its reflectance.

Materials and Methods: The study area is located at Zahirieh watershed of Khuzestan province which is between Ahvaz and Masjedsoleyman cities with approximately 7100ha area. The average of rainfall is 218.6mm, the maximum temperature is 54 and the minimum is 7 degrees. Regarding the separation of erosional and depositional surfaces in the study area; first, using the visual inspection of Landsat satellite false color images, 8 regions were divided into several regions, then random sampling points were created using the random point generator tool in ArcGIS 10.4 software to implement the random sampling method within the block. Finally, 12 sampling points representing erosion surfaces and 14 sampling points representing depositional surfaces were selected and sampled to determine surface soil characteristics. Surface soil color was determined using Mansell's color book in natural daylight in two dry and moist conditions. After collecting the soil samples in air-dry moisture condition and also in wet condition, their spectroscopic analysis was done by FieldSpec3 device and this moisture condition was considered for all the soil samples of eroded and depositional surfaces. Statistical analyzes and mean comparisons were performed using SPSS 26 statistical software. Corrections of satellite images and transformations were made in ENVI 4.7 software, and visual outputs and maps were made in ArcGIS 10.4 software.

Results and Discussion: Results depicted that among the evaluated soil color indicators, the dry weight parameter is significant at the level of 1%. This level of significance shows well that the Value index in the dry state can be used as an effective parameter to identify and separate erosion and deposition levels in the study area. There is a difference between the values of the statistics for red, green and blue RGB in the dry state for erosion and depositional surfaces, and these differences are also evident for the moist state. In the depositional surfaces, with the drying of the soil, blue, red, and green reflections all decrease, but this decrease is double and about six times for blue. The reduction of blue reflections in the RGB system leads to an increase in the yellowness of the color. In the case of the soils of erosion surfaces, we can see the pattern of the photo and we see the enhancement of reflections and consequently the lightening of the color of the soil when the soil is dry. According to what has been seen in the Munsell system, it seems that this issue has a direct relationship with the amount of organic matter and the ratio of fulvic acid to humic acid in the organic matter of the soil. Moreover, the results of the comparison of the average bands of Landsat 8 shows that bands 2, 3 and 4 are able to separate erosion and sedimentary surfaces at the 1% level, but thermal bands cannot be used to separate surfaces. Due to the difference in the color characteristics of erosional and sedimentary surfaces, as a result, it is possible to separate them based on reflectometric characteristics, and it is possible to separate eroded and sedimentary surfaces by using color indices.

Conclusion: Due to the difference in the color characteristics of erosional and depositional surfaces, as a result, it is possible to separate them based on reflectometric characteristics, and it is possible to separate eroded and depositional surfaces by using color indices. The results showed that it was possible to model surface soil characteristics using quantified surface soil color data, and this hypothesis was confirmed by statistical investigations.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Reflectometry
radio spectrophotometry
quantified soil color indices (RGB)
gully erosion
  1. Campbell, J.B., and R.H. Wynne. 2011. Introduction to remote sensing. 5th edition, The Guilford Press, New York. [ISBN: 160918176X]
  2. Centore, P. 2013. Conversion between the Munsell and sRGB colur systems. Qualia Communications Timo Teichert. [ Technical Report]
  3. Comprehensive studies of Shahid Modarres Basin Parcel 15. 1990. General Directorate of Natural Resources of Khuzestan Province. Technical Report. [In Persian]
  4. Dehni, A., and M. Louisa. 2012. Remote sensing techniques for salt affected soil mapping: application to the Oran region of Algeria. Procedia Engineering 33: 188-198.[ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1193]
  5. Khan-Yaghma, M., Nabizadeh, A., Jalil-Nejad, N., and Khan-Yaghma, S. 2013. Improving soil erosion and sedimentation management using soil geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS). Second National Conference on Modern Management Sciences. Gorgan. [In Persian]
  6. Kim, K. I., and Hong, S. D. 2002. Relationship between soil color characteristics and measurement values by colorimeter. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 35(2), 77-86.
  7. Kozmenko A. S. 1948. Soil erosion and control. Agroforestry (Moscow: Selkhozgiz) 328.
  8. Liu, L., Zhang, K.L., Fu, S.H., Liu, B.Y., Huang, M.B., Zhang, Z.D., Zhang, F.B., and Yu, Y. 2019. Rapid magnetic susceptibility measurement for obtaining superficial soil layer thickness and its erosion monitoring implications. Geoderma, 351 (2019), pp. 163-173.[ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.030]
  9. Makki, S., Rezaee, P., and Peyrowan, H.R. 2016. Assessing the effective factors on water erosion in Marly deposits of Mishan and Aghajary formations in the west of Bandar Abbas. E.E.R.6 (1) :30-51. [In Persian]
  10. Musasa, T., Timothy, D., and Marambanyika, T. 2024. Landsat satellite programme potential for soil erosion assessment and monitoring in arid environments: A review of applications and challenges. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. Volume 12, Issue 2, June 2024, Pages 267-278.[ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.10.003]
  11. Owens, P.R., and Rutledge, E.M. 2005. Morphology. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment 2005, Pages 511-520.[ISBN: 9780124095489]
  12. Phinzi, K., Ngetar, N.S., and Ebhuoma, O. 2021. Soil erosion risk assessment in the Umzintlava catchment (T32E), Eastern Cape, South Africa, using RUSLE and random forest algorithm. South African Geographical Journal, 103 (2) (2021), pp. 139-162.[ https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2020.1716838]
  13. Rezaei Arshad, R., Mahmoudabadi, M., Farpour, M. H., and Fekri, M. 2018. The effect of wind-induced rain on inter-furrow erosion using a simultaneous wind, rain and runoff simulator. Agricultural Engineering, 41(3), 55-72.[ doi: 10.22055/agen.2019.22959.1365]
  14. Sakti, Anjar Dimara, Sembiring, E., Rohayani, P., Fauzan, K.N., Anggraini, T.S., Santoso, C., Patricia, V.A., Ihsan, K.T.N., Ramadan, A.H., and Arjasakusuma, S. 2023. Identification of illegally dumped plastic waste in a highly polluted river in Indonesia using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Sci Rep 13, 5039.[ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32087-5]
  15. Sepuru, T.K., and Dube, T. 2018. Understanding the spatial distribution of eroded areas in the former rural homelands of South Africa: Comparative evidence from two new non- 59 commercial multispectral sensors. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 69 (2018), pp. 119-132.[ DOI:1016/j.jag.2018.02.020]
  16. Shirjandi, S, Khademalrasoul, A., Moradi Sabzkouhi, A. and Amerikhah, H. 2019. Optimal location of gabion dams using hierarchical analysis and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (case study of Imamzadeh Baghmalek basin). Agricultural Engineering, 43(3), 315-330. [doi: 10.22055/agen.2020.31651.1522]
  17. Surmach, G. P. 1955. Classification of washed away soils and its application in drawing up largescale soil-erosion maps. Eurasian Soil Science 5 66-68.
  18. Tubalov, A.A. 2022. Use of digital characteristics of soil color for assessing the degree of soil erosion. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1045 (2022) 012076. [DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1045/1/012076]
  19. Zaslavsky, M .N. 1962. Some issues of classification and mapping of eroded soils. Issues of erosion and increasing the productivity of slope lands in Moldova 2 79-90.
  20. Zhongdian, Z., Liang L., Mingbin H., Feiyan C., Jiqiang N., and Minghua L. 2022. Feasibility of soil erosion measurement using time domain Reflectometry. Vol. 218. 106571.[ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106571]