مهندسی زراعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بررسی اثر کاربرد کود نانو کربن دات آهن بر پارامترهای رشد رویشی گیاه سورگوم در یک خاک آهکی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

2 دانشیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

3 استاد گروه بیومتریال، نانوتکنولوژی و مهندسی بافت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان

4 استادیار گروه بیومتریال، نانوتکنولوژی و مهندسی بافت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان

5 عضو هیات علمی، بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اصفهان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر کاربرد کود نانو کربن دات آهن بر ویژگی‌های رشد رویشی گیاه سورگوم در یک خاک آهکی بود. سنتز نانو کربن دات بدون پوشش به روش هیدروترمال و پوشش‌دهی با پلی لاکیک اسید به روش هم رسوبی انجام شد. نتایج آنالیز دستگاه‌های UV-VIS و FTIR بارگذاری آهن روی سطح کربن دات‌ها را تایید کردند.آزمایش گلخانه‌ای به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی در 3 تکرار انجام شد. فاکتور اول برگ‌پاشی آهن در سه سطح (آب مقطر، سولفات آهن و کربن دات آهن بدون پوشش با غلظت 3 در هزار) و فاکتور دوم کاربرد خاکی کربن دات آهن (با پوشش و بدون پوشش) در 5 سطح که شامل شاهد، کربن دات آهن بدون پوشش و پوشش‌دار هر کدام در دو سطح (mg kg -1 5 و10) بود. طبق نتایج بیشترین تعداد برگ (60/6)، ارتفاع ساقه (cm52/35)، وزن تر ساقه (g plant-1 73/24)، وزن تر برگ (g plant-139/24)، وزن خشک برگ (g plant-137/5) و وزن خشک ساقه (g plant-173/4)، غلظت آهن در ساقه (mg kg-1211) و برگ (mg kg-1 186) مربوط به اثر متقابل تیمار خاکی کربن دات آهن بدون پوشش با سطح mg kg -1 10 با محلول‌پاشی کربن دات (غلظتg lit-13) و بیشترین غلظت آهن خاک (mg kg-1 92/5) مربوط به تیمار خاکی کربن دات آهن پوشش‌دارmg kg -1 10 محلول‌پاشی شده با کربن دات (غلظت 3 در هزار) بود. بنابراین هر دو نوع کود جهت کشت سورگوم و تامین نیاز کودی آن مناسبند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the effect of iron nano carbon dot fertilizer application on vegetative growth parameters of sorghum in a calcareous soil

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yasman Zilabpour 1
  • Mojtaba Barani 2
  • Mohammad Rafieinia 3
  • Elham Bidram 4
  • Mojtaba Yahyaabadi 5

1 PhD Student, Department of Soil Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

3 Professor, Department of Biomaterials, Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Biomaterials, Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

5 Member of Scientific Board, Soil and Water Research Division, Esfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Nanotechnology involves nanomaterials that are less than 100 nm as an interdisciplinary and pioneering technology has solved many problems in the fields of agriculture. The use of iron nano-fertilizers in order to control the release of nutrients can achieve sustainable agriculture by reducing the consumption of chemical fertilizers. Nano CDs (carbon dots) are a new system or carbon material between molecule and condensed solid, which gathers the characteristics of nano effect, surface functional groups and carbon elements. Therefore, it shows three basic functions of optics, chemistry and biology, and has multiple functions and applications. In addition, the abundant hydrophilic functional groups on the surface of CDs, small size and other structural characteristics made it show great advantages in promoting crop growth and enhancing photosynthesis and stress resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of iron nano carbon dot fertilizer application on vegetative growth parameters of sorghum plant in a calcareous soil.
Materials and Methods
Iron nano carbon dots were synthesized with lemon juice (carbon source), ethylenediamine and iron sulfate (iron source) by hydrothermal method. Coating of nanoparticles with poly lactic acid was done by co-precipitation method. Characterization of iron nano carbon-dots to confirm the successful loading of iron on the surface of carbon dots and also successful coating was done by UV-VIS, EDAX, FTIR, TEM and SEM device analyses. Some chemical properties of nanocarbon dots such as pH, electrical conductivity and salinity index were measured. Sorghum cultivation was done in the greenhouse of Isfahan agricultural and natural resources research center with a factorial design in 3 replications. The first factor was foliar spraying in three levels (distilled water, iron sulfate and no coating iron carbon dot with a concentration of 3 per thousand) and the second factor was soil application of iron carbon dot (with and no coating) in 5 levels including iron carbon dot, no coating and coated each in two levels (5 and 10 mg Fe kg-1 soil). Foliar spraying of sorghum at the eight-leaf stage was carried out by iron carbon dot and iron sulfate with a concentration of 3 parts per thousand. After the plant growth period (4 months), growth parameters such as the number of leaves, stem height, stem diameter, and fresh and dry weight of stem and leaves were measured. Also, the concentration of iron in plants and soil was also measured.
Results and Discussion
No coating iron nano carbon dots had 4.98% total iron and polylactic acid coated carbon dots had 1% iron. According to the successful results on carbon dots, they were confirmed with UV-VIS and FTIR devices. Based on the results of leaf number (6/60), stem height (35.52cm), stem fresh weight (24.73 g plant-1), leaf fresh weight (24.39 g plant-1), leaf dry weight (5.37 g plant-1) and the dry weight of the stem (4.73 g plant-1) was related to the interaction effect of no coating iron carbon dot soil treatment with a level of mg Fe kg-1 soil 1 with carbon dot foliar spraying (concentration 3 per thousand). The highest amount of iron in the stem (211 mg kg-1) and leaf (186 mg kg-1) is related to the carbon dot iron soil treatment with a level of 10 mg Fe kg-1 soil and the highest amount in the soil (5.92 mg kg-1). It was related to the interaction effect of iron carbon dot soil treatment coated with polylactic acid polymer (level of 10 mg Fe kg-1 soil) with carbon dot foliar spraying (concentration 3 parts per thousand).
Conclusion
Among the foliar treatments with iron carbon dot and ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, the treatments that were in the group of foliar treatments with nano carbon dot iron had the most positive performance. The treatment of no coating iron carbon dot and then the treatment of iron carbon dot coated with polylactic acid, with level of 10 mg Fe kg-1 soil which simultaneously applied soil and foliar application with carbon dot with concentration 3 parts per thousand showed the best performance. Therefore, these two types of synthesized nano fertilizers are suitable for sorghum cultivation and can be used as a type of iron fertilizer for agricultural purposes.
Keywords: Iron nano carbon dot, nano carbon dot coating, sorghum, foliar spraying

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Iron nano carbon dot
  • nano carbon dot coating
  • sorghum
  • foliar spraying
مراجع
  1. Abou-Shlell, M. K. Botanical studies on Moringa plant. 2017. Sci. of thesis Botany Dept. Fac. Agric. Moshtohor pp 154.
  2. Ahmed, S., Niger, F., Kabir, M. , Chakrabarti, G., Nur, H. P. and Imamul Huq, S. M. 2012. Development of Slow Release Nano Fertilizer. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Nanotechnology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  3. Alidoust, D., Isoda, A. 2013a. Effect of g-Fe2O3 nanoparticles on photosynthetic characteristic of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.): foliar spray versus soil amendment. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 3365-3375.
  4. Alvarez-Ferna´ndez, A., Garcı´a-Laviña, P., Fidalgo, J. Abadı´a, J., Abadı´a ,A. 2004. Foliar fertilization to control iron chlorosis in pear (Pyrus communis L.) trees, Plant and Soil, 263: 5–15.
  5. Askary, M., Talebi, S.M., Amini, F., Bangan, A.D.B. 2017. Effects of iron nanoparticles on Menthapiperita L. under salinity stress. Biologija, 63: 65-75.
  6. Azeem, B. K., Kushaari, Z.B., Man, A., Basit, T.H. 2014. Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. Journal of Controlled Release, 181: 11–21.
  7. Baghaie, N., Keshavarz, N., and Nazaran, M.H. 2012. Effect of Nano Iron chelate fertilizer on yield and yield components of rice, Hashemi cultivar. 12th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress. Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran. 1-5.
  8. Bahari, M., Pahlevani, R., Akbari, N. and Ehsanzadeh, P. 2005. The effect of different amounts of Fe and Cu fertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea genotypes under dryland conditions of Aligudarz-Azna in Lorestan province. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 12. Specialized for Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 12, 190-201. (In Persian with English abstract).
  9. Bastani, S., Hajiboland, R., Khatamian, M., and Saket-Oskoui, M. 2018. Nano iron (Fe) complex is an effective source of Fe for tobacco plants grown under low Fe supply. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 18(2): 524-541.
  10. Bozorgi, H. R. 2012. Effects of foliar spraying with marine plant Ascophyllum nodosum extract and nano iron chelate fertilizer on fruit yield and several attributes of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7 (5): 357-362.
  11. Burke, D. J., Pietrasiak, N., Situ, S. F., Abenojar, E.C., Porche, M., Kraj, P., Samia, A.C.S. 2015. Iron oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticle effects on plant performance and root associated microbes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences,16 (10): 23630–23650.
  12. Chen, J. S., Lu, Z., Zhang, X., Zhao, X., Li, P., Ning, M. 2018. Environmentally friendly fertilizers: a review of materials used and their effects on the environment, Science of the Total Environment, 613–614.
  13. Chu, K., Lee, S., Chang, C. and Liu,. L. 2019. Recent Progress of Carbon Dot Precursors and Photocatalysis Applications. Polymers, 11(4): 1-31.
  14. Cottenie, A. 1980. Soil and plant testing as a basis of fertilizer recommendation. FAO Soils Bull, 38: 70-73.
  15. Delfani, M., Firouzabadi, M. B., Farrokhi, N., Makarian, H. 2014. Some physiological responses of black-eyed pea to iron and magnesium nanofertilizers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45: 530–540.
  16. Ehleringer, J. 1980. Leaf morphology and reflectance in relation to water and temperature stress. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  17. El, T., Manal, A., Raihane, M., El, A., Mehdi, M., Rachid, K. 2020. Poly (ε ‑ caprolactone)‑ g ‑ guar gum and poly (ε ‑ caprolactone)‑ g ‑ halloysite nanotubes as coatings for slow ‑ release DAP fertilizer, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 8: 2078-2090.
  18. Farrington, D., Lunt, J., and Blackburn, R. S. 2005. Poly(lactic acid) Fibres, Biodegradable and Sustainable Fibres, CRC, EnglandChap6, 30.
  19. Fathi, A., Zahedi, M., Torabian, S., Khoshgoftar, A., 2017. Response of wheat genotypes to foliar spray of ZnO and Fe2O3 nanoparticles under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40 (10): 1376-1385.
  20. Fernandez, V., Del Rı´o, V., Abadı´a , J., Abadı´a, A. 2006. Foliar iron fertilization of peach (Prunas Persica (L.) Basch): effects of iron compounds, surfactants and other adjutants. Plant and Soil, 289: 239–252.
  21. Ghafariyan, M. H., Malakouti, M. J., Dadpour, M. R., Stroeve, P., Mahmoudi, M. 2013. Effects of magnetite nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 10645–10652.
  22. Gonzalo, M.J., Lucena, J., and Hernández-Apaolaza, L. 2013. Effect of silicon addition on soybean (Glycine max) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants grown under iron deficiency. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 70: 455-461.
  23. Grillet, L., Mari, S., and Schmidt, W. 2014. Iron in seeds loading pathways and subcellular localization. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4: 535-547.
  24. Hamzei, J., Najjari, S., Sadeghi, F., and Seyedi. M. 2014. Effect of foliar application of nano-iron chelate and inoculation with mesorhizobium bacteria on root nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea under rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Reserch, 5 (2): 9-18.
  25. Harsinia, M. G., Habibib, H., Talaei, G. H. 2014. Study the effects of iron nano chelated fertilizers foliar application on yield and yield components of new line of wheat cold region of kermanshah provence. Agricultural Advances, 3(4): 95-102.
  26. He, D. Y., Luo, S. Lu., M. Liu, Y., Song, L. 2018. Microplastics in soils: analytical methods, pollution characteristics and ecological risks, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 109, 163–172.
  27. Hong, R., Pan, T., Qian, J. and Li, H. 2006. Synthesis and surface modification of ZnO nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 119: 71-81.
  28. Hu, J., Iia, W., Yu, X., Yan, CH. White, J., Liu, J., Shen, G., Tao, S., Wang, X. 2022. Carbon dots improve the nutritional quality of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) by promoting photosynthesis and nutrient uptake. Environmental Science: Nano journal, 9 (5): 1651–1661
  29. Huang, Q., Liu, Y., Zheng, L., Wu1, L., Zhou, Chen, J., Chen, W., and Zhao, H. 2019. Biocompatible iron(II)-doped carbon dots as T1-weighted magnetic resonance contrast agents and fluorescence imaging probes. Microchimica Acta, 7:767–783.
  30. Joseph, T. and M. Morrison., 2006. Nanotechnology in agricalture and food. Institute of Nanotechnology. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 84: 1-13.
  31. Kale, S. N., Mona, J., Dhobale, S., Thite, T., Laware, S.L. 2011. Intramolecular and intermolecular crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol–borate complexes for the sustained release of fertilizers and enzymes, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 121: 2450-2457.
  32. Khater, M. S. 2015. Magnetite- Nanoparticles Effects on Growth and essential oil of Peppermint. Current Science International, 4(2): 2077-4435.
  33. Khodakovskaya, M. V., Kim, B. S., Kim, J. N., Alimohammadi, M., Dervishi, E., Mustafa, T., and Cernigla, C. E. 2012. Carbon Nanotubes as Plant Growth Regulators: Effects on Tomato Growth, Reproductive System, and Soil Microbial Community. Small, 9(1), 115–123.
  34. Khodakovskaya, M., Kim, B. S., Kim, J. N., AlimohammadiDervishi, M. E., Mustafa, T., Cernigla, C. E. 2013. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial. Community. Small, 9:115–123.
  35. Lassalle, V., Ferreira, M. L. 2007. PLA Nano- and Microparticles for Drug Delivery: An Overview of theMethods of Preparation. Macromol Biosci, 7: 767-783.
  36. Lateef, A., Nazir, R., Jamil, N., Alam, S., Shah, R., Naeem Khan. M., Saleem, M., and Rehman, S. 2019. Synthesis and characterization of environmental friendly corncob biochar based nano-composite. A potential slow release nano-fertilizer for sustainable agriculture. Environ Nanotechnology, Monit Mang, 11: 1532-2215.
  37. Li, M., Zhang, P., Adeel, M., Guo, Z., Chetwynd, A.J., Ma, C., Rui, Y., 2021. Physiological impacts of zero valent iron, Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles in rice plants and their potential as Fe fertilizers. Environmental Pollut, 269, 116134.
  38. Lindsay, W. L., and Norvell, W. A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal, 42(3): 421-428.
  39. Liu, X. M., Zhang, F. D., Feng, Z. B., Zhang, S.Q., He, X. S., Wang, R. F. and Wang, Y. J. 2005. Effects of nano-ferric oxide on the growth and nutrients absorption of peanut. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 11: 551-555.
  40. Liu, Y., Shen, Y. T., Sun, L. T., Li, J. C., Liu, C., Ren, W. C., Li, F., Gao, L. B., Chen, J., Liu, F. C., Sun, Y. Y.,Tang, N. J., Cheng, H. M., Du,. Y. W. 2016. Elemental superdoping of graphene and carbon nanotubes. Nature Communications, 7: 1-9.
  41. Lucena, J.J. 2006. Synthetic iron chelates to correct iron deficiency in plants. P 103-128, In: L.L. Barton and J. Abadía (eds.), Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Springer, Dordrecht.
  42. Machado, J. R., Nakagwa, J., Rosolem, C. A. and Brinhool, I. 1990. Fild crops Abstracts. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 43(11).
  43. Mahmoud, A. W. M., Ayad, A. A., Abdel-Aziz, H. S. M., Williams, L. L., El-Shazoly, R. M., Abdel-Wahab, A., Abdeldaym, E. A. 2022. Foliar Application of Different Iron Sources Improves Morpho-Physiological Traits and Nutritional Quality of Broad Bean Grown in Sandy Soil. Plants, 11, 2599.
  44. Martinez-Fernandez, D., Komarek, M., 2016. Comparative effects of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) and Fe2O3 nanoparticles on root hydraulic conductivity of Solanumlycopersicum L. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 131, 128–136.
  45. Mazaherinia, S., Astaraei, A.R., Fotovat, A., Monshi, A. 2010. Nano iron oxide particles efficiency on Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations in wheat plant. World Applied Sciences Journal, J. 7(1), 36- 40.
  46. Moosapoor, N.S., Sadeghi, M., and Bidarigh, S. 2013. Effect of bohr nanofertilizer and chelated iron on the yield of peanut in province guilan. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Science, 3: 45-62.
  47. Olsen, S. R and L. E. Sommers. 1982. P. 403-430. In: A. Lpage (Ed.)Methods of soil Analysis, Agron. No. 9, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society. Agronomy. Madison WI, USA.
  48. Omidi, H., Tahmasebi, Z., Naghdi Badi, H. A., Torabi, H., and Miransari, M. 2010. Fatty acid composition of canola (Brassica napus L.), as affected by agronomical, genotypic and environmental parameters. Comptes Rendus Biol, 333: 248-254.
  49. Pakkath, S., Chetty, S., Selvarasu, P., Murugan, A., Kumar, Y., Periyasamy, L., Santhakumar, M., Sadras, Sand Santhakumar, K2018Transition Metal Ion (Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, and Ni2+)‑Doped Carbon Dots Synthesized via Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis: A Potential Nanoprobe for Magneto-fluorescent Dual-Modality Bioimaging. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, (7): 2582-2596.
  50. 50-Peng, Z., Zeng, M., Wu, S., Yan, Z., Rui, J., Qiu, P. and Wang, X. 2022. Development of a pH-Responsive, SO42–-loaded Fe and N co-doped carbon quantum dots-based fluorescent method for highly sensitive detection of glyphosate . Anaytica Chimica Acta.
  51. Pourgholam, M., Nemati, N., and Oveysi, M. 2013. Effect of zinc and iron under the influence of drought on yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Annals of Biologcal Research, 4(4):186-189.
  52. Qu, D., Zheng, M., Zhang, L., Zhao, H., Xie, Z., Jing, X., Haddad, R. E., Fan, H., Sun, Z. 2013. Formation mechanism and optimization of highly luminescent N-doped graphene quantum dots. Scientific reports, 4 (1): 1-11.
  53. Raiesi‑Ardali1,T., Maˈmani, L., Chorom, M., and Moezzi, A. 2022. Improved iron use efficiency in tomato using organically coated iron oxide nanoparticles as efficient bioavailable Fe sources. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Agric, 1-16.
  54. Ramimoghadam, D., Hussein, M., and Taufiq-Yap, Y. 2012. The Effect of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) And Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) onThe Properties of Zno Synthesized By HydrothermalMethod. International Journal Of MolecularSciences, 13: 13275-13293.
  55. Razmandeh, N., Zakernejad, S., Payandeh, Kh. 2020. Assess Effect of Vermicompost and Iron Nano Fertilizer on Morphological Traits and Chlorophyll Content of Zea mays L. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science, 6:77-87
  56. Rico, C.M., Majumdar, S., Duarte-Gardea, M., Peralta-Videa, J.R., Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. 2011. Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59 (8), 3485–3498.
  57. Roosta, H. R., and Mohsenian, Y. 2012. Effects of foliar spray of different Fe sources on pepper (Capsicum annum L.) plants in aquaponic system. Scientia Horticulturae, 146: 182-191.
  58. Rui, M., Ma, C., Hao, Y., Guo, J., Rui, Y., Tang, X., Zhao, Q., Fan, X., Zhang, Z., Hou, T., Zhu, S., 2016. Iron oxide nanoparticles as a potential iron fertilizer for peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 815.
  59. Sabir, A., Yazara, K., Sabira, F., Karaa, Z., Atilla Yazicib, M. and Goksu, N. 2014. Vine growth, yield, berry quality attributes and leaf nutrient content of grapevines as influenced by seaweed extract (Ascophyllum nodosum) and nanosize fertilizer pulverizations. Scientia Horticulturae, 175: 1-8.
  60. Saedpanah, P., Mohammadi, K., Fayaz, F. 2016. Agronomic traits of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in response to spraying of nanofertilizers, ascorbic and salicylic acid. Journal of Research in Ecology, 4 (2): 359-365.
  61. Scott, N., and Chen, H. 2003. Nanoscale science and engineering for agriculture and food systems, A Report Submitted to Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service the USDA. National Planning Workshop November 18-19, 2002 Washington, DC. Cornell University.
  62. Shafiee-Masouleh, S. S., Hatamzadeh, A., Samizadeh, H. and Rad-Moghadam, K. 2014. Enlarging bulblet by magnetic and chelating structures of nano-chitosan as supplementary fertilizer in Lilium. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 55 (6): 437-444.
  63. Shailesh, K.D., Pramod, M., Rajashri, K. and Anand, K. 2013. Effect of nanoparticles suspension on the growth of Mung (Vigna radiata) seedlings by foliar spray method. Nanotechnology Development, 3, e1. 1-5.
  64. Sharafi, S., Tajbakhsh, M. Majidi, A. Poormirza, A. and Malakooti. M. J. 2000. Evaluation effect of Fe and Zn on yield, protein and nutrition balance at two corn cultivar. Water and Soil, 12(11):85-94.
  65. Sheykhbaglou, R., Sedghi, M., Shishevan, M. T and Sharifi, R. S. 2010. Effects of nano-iron oxide particles on agronomic traits of soybean. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2 (2): 112-113.
  66. Soleimanzadeh, A. and Fekri, M. 2021. Effects of green iron nanoparticles on iron changes and phytoavailability in a calcareous soil. Pedosphere, 31(5), 761–770.
  67. Sparks, D. L. 1996. Methods of soil analysis. Madison: SSSA, ASA Publishing. Takahashi, F., Mizoguchi, T., Yoshida, R., Ichimura, K. and Shinozaki, K. F. 2011. Calmodulin-dependent activation of MAP kinase for ROS homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Molecular Cell, 41:649–660.
  68. Stafford, J. 2000. Implementing Precision Agriculture in the 21st Century. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 76(3): 267-275.
  69. Tadesse, A. Hago, M. RomaDevi, D. Basavaiah, K. and Belachew, N. 2020. Fluorescent- Nitrogen- Doped Carbon Quantum Dots Derived from Citrus Lemon Juice: Green Synthesis, Mercury(II) Ion Sensing, and Live Cell Imaging. ACS Omega, 5(8): 3889-3898.
  70. Tan, T.L., Zulkifli, N.A., Zaman, A.S.K., Jusoh, M.B., Yaapar, M.N., Rashid, S.A. 2021. Impact of photoluminescent carbon quantum dots on photosynthesis efficiency of rice and corn crops. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 162: 737–751.
  71. Tomaszewska, M., Jarosiewicz, A. 2006. Encapsulation of mineral fertilizer by polysulfone using a spraying method. Desalination, 198: 346–352.
  72. Tripathi, S., Sonkar, S. K., and Sarkar, S. 2011. Growth stimulation of gram (Cicer arietinum) plant by water soluble carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale, 3(3): 1176–1181.
  73. Wang, H. Zhang, M., Song, Y., Li, H., Huang, H. Shao, M., Liu, Y., Kang, Z. 2018. Carbon dots promote the growth and photosynthesis of mung bean sprouts. Carbon, 136 (94): 1-34.
  74. Wang, L., Li, W. Wu, B., Li, Z. P., and DWu, M. 2016. Facile synthesis of fluorescent graphene quantum dots from coffee grounds for bioimaging and sensing. Chemical Engineering Journal, 300:75–82.
  75. Wang, X. and Cai. Q. S. 2010. Steel alag as an iron fertilizer for com growth and soil. Journal of Plant Physiology, 132: 421-427.
  76. Wang, Y., Wang, S., Xu, M., Xiao, L., Dai, Z., and Li, J. 2019. The impacts of γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the physiology and fruit quality of muskmelon (Cucumis melo). plants Environmental Pollution, 249: 1011-1018
  77. Xu, X., Ray, R., Gu, Y., Ploehn, H.J., Gearheart, L., Raker, K., Scrivens, W.A. 2004. Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126: 12736–12737.
  78. Zayed, B.A., Salem, A.K.M., El Sharkawy, H.M., 2011. Effect of Different Micronutrient Treatments on Rice (Oriza sativa L.) Growth and Yield under Saline Soil Conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7, 179–184.
  79. Zhao, L. Y. Huang, A. S. Adeleye and A. A. Keller. 2017. Metabolomics Reveals Cu(OH)2 Nanopesticide-Activated Anti-oxidative Pathways and Decreased Beneficial Antioxidants in Spinach Leaves Environ. Journal of Materials Science and Technology.
  80. Zhu, Sh., Song, Y., Zhao, X., Shao, J., Zhang, J., Yang, B. 2015. The photoluminescence mechanism in carbon dots (graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots, and polymer dots): Current state and future perspective. Nano Research, 8(2):355‐
مهندسی زراعی
دوره 46، شماره 4
بهمن 1402
صفحه 343-370
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار