مهندسی زراعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اثرکاربرد بیوچار اصلاح شده اسیدی بر رشد رویشی و اجزای عملکرد گیاه کینوا در یک خاک آهکی متاثر از نمک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فازغ التحصیل کارشناسی ارشد گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

4 فازغ التحصیل دکتری گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

یکی از راه‌های استفاده و بهره برداری از اراضی شور استفاده از ارقام متحمل به شوری مانند گیاه کینوا (Chenopodium quinoa) است. از طرفی استفاده از بیوچار pH خاک را افزایش می‌دهد و در خاک‌های قلیایی و آهکی ممکن است در دسترس بودن عناصر را کاهش دهد. لذا اصلاح بیوچار با اسید‌ها می‌تواند سبب افزایش قابلیت دسترسی به عناصر غذایی موجود در بیوچار می-شود. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر بیوچار برنج و بیوچار اسیدی شده بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گیاه کینوا در یک خاک آهکی متاثر از نمک می‌باشد. آزمایشی فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در 4 تکرار به ‌صورت گلدانی به اجرا در آمد. فاکتورها شامل 3 نوع بیوچار (اصلاح نشده برنج، اصلاح شده برنج با روش پیش اسیدی و اصلاح شده برنج با روش پس اسیدی) و سطوح مختلف بیوچار (0، 2 و 5 درصد وزنی) بودند. نتایج نشان داد که بیوچار اسیدی شده برنج بر تمامی ویژگی‌های رشد رویشی در سطح احتمال یک درصد (01/0>P) معنی‌دار شد. نتایج نشان داد بیشترین مقدار وزن خشک گیاه 82/8 گرم در بوته، ارتفاع 50/77 سانتی‌متر، وزن هزار دانه 17/3 گرم در بوته و شاخص برداشت 03/45 از تیمار 5 درصد بیوچار برنج پس اسیدی به دست آمد که نسبت به تیمار 5 درصد بیوچار اسیدی نشده برنج به ترتیب افزایشی معادل (97/81)، (77/56)، (17/32) و (06/7) درصد داشت. به طور کلی می‌توان گفت که استفاده از بیوچار برنج اصلاح شده (پیش اسیدی و پس اسیدی) نقش مثبتی در افزایش ویژگی‌های رشد رویشی گیاه کینوا داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Application of Acid Modified Biochar on Vegetative Growth and Yield components of Quinoa in a Calcareous soil Affected by Salt

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehri Bazi abdoli 1
  • M Barani 2
  • abdolamir Bosatni 3
  • Taleb Nazari 4

1 MSC Graduated, Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD Student, Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction Various biomass sources such as crop residues have been proposed as feedstock for biochar production . Meanwhile, a large quantity of crop residues (rice) is produced as waste and they are either burnt or piled and abandoned at some locations in the fields. Burning of crop residues is resulting in substantial loss of nutrients, and may lead to air pollution and human health problems . An alternative approach is to apply crop residues to soil in the form of biochar. Bioavailability of nutrients exclusively micronutrients (Fe, Zn) is
a serious problem in soils having high pH which ends in crops yield to decline and ultimately can lead to malnutrition in humans. The biochar modification with acid may increase the solubility of nutrients (P, , Fe, Zn, Cu,,Mn) present in biochar, thereby significant improvement in mineral nutrition of plants grown in calcareous soils. In the other hand, One of the ways to use and exploit saline lands is to use salinity-tolerant cultivars, such as the Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) plant. It is known that biochar increases soil pH, which may result in less availability of phosphorus and other micronutrients, such as Fe, Zn, and Mn, in alkaline and calcareous soils. Therefore, modifying biochar with acids can increase the availability of nutrients in biochar for different plants grown in calcareous soils. The objection of this study is to investigate the effect of normal biochar and acid-modified biochar from rice residues on the yield and yield components of quinoa plants (Gizavan number) in a calcareous soil affected by salt.

Materials and Methods The soil used in the study was collected from 0-30 cm depth which passed through via 2-mm sieve after air-drying and its chemical and physical properties were determined. To achieve the aim of this study, the factorial experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design in 4 replications. Factors include 3 types of rice biochar (unmodified, modified by pre-acidic method and modified by post-acidic method) and different levels of biochar (0, 2, and 5% by weight). Then 10 quinoa seeds were planted in each pot at 2 cm depth which after the plant emerging and greening declined to 3 plants in each pot. The pots were randomly moved twice a week during growth to eliminate environmental effects. Irrigation and weeding operations were done by hand. After the end of the growth period (187 days), the plants were harvested. So vegetative growth parameters and yield components including shoots fresh and dry weight, plant height, stem diameter, panicle length, number of leaves, number of lateral branches, and 1000 grain weight were measured and then biological yield and harvest index were determined. The statistical results of the data were analyzed using SAS software (9.4) and the LSD test (at 5% level) was used for comparing the mean values.
Results and Discussion As a result of adding biochar to soil, it becomes alkaline. Chemical modification of biochar using strong acids can reduce soil pH and improve the fertility of calcareous soils and increase vegetative parameters and yield components of quinoa. Based on the obtained results, the interaction effect of different types and levels of biochar on all investigated traits was significant at the level of 1%. The results showed that the highest height, fresh and dry weight, panicle length, number of lateral branches, and stem diameter were related to the 5% post-acidic rice biochar treatment and the lowest value was related to the control treatment. furthermore, the results showed that the highest amount of plant dry weight of 8.82 gr/pot, the height of 77.50 cm, and 1000 seed weight of 17.3 gr/pot was obtained from the treatment of 5% post-acidic rice biochar, compared to the treatment of 5% Unacidified rice biochar had an increase of (81.97), (56.77), (32.17) and (7.06) percent respectively. As a result of the high dry weight of shoots and the 1000 seed weight, the 5% post-acidic rice biochar treatment provided the highest biological yield at 16.05 and harvest index at 45.03.

Conclusion Under the conditions of this study, acid-modified biochars (post-acidic and pre-acidic) enhanced vegetative growth characteristics and yield components of quinoa plants in calcareous soils affected by salt. Therefore, it is recommended to prepare biochar from acidic sources or to modify it with post-acidic and pre- acidic methods.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Acid biochar
  • Quinoa
  • Vegetative growth parameters
  • Yield and yield components
مراجع
  1. Abdul, G., Zhu, X., Chen, B. 2017. Structural characteristics of biochar-graphene nanosheet composites and their adsorption performance for phthalic acid esters. Chemical Engineering Journal, 319, 9-20.
  2. Akhtar, S. S., Andersen, M. N., Liu, F. 2015. Biochar mitigates salinity stress in potato. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 201(5), 368-378.
  3. Basra, S. M. A., Iqbal, S. and Afzal, I. 2014 Evaluating the response of nitrogen application on growth, development and yield of quinoa genotypes. Journal of Agriculture and Biology 16: 886-892.
  4. Benton Jones, J. R., Case, V. W. 1990. Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue sample. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, SSSA, (3).
  5. Bharadwaj, A., Y. Wang, S. Sridhar and V. S. Arunachalam. 2004. Pyrolysis of rice husk. Current Science 87: 981-986.
  6. Cantrell, K. B., Hunt, P. G., Uchimiya, M., Novak, J. M., Ro, K. S. 2012. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresource technology, 107, 419-428.
  7. Chan, K. Y., L. Van Zwieten., I. Meszaros., A. Downie, and S. Joseph. 2007. Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45:629–34. doi:10.1071/SR07109.
  8. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle‐size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling, 9, 545-567.
  9. Dong, D., Feng, Q., Mcgrouther, K., Yang, M., Wang, H., Wu, W. 2015. Effects of biochar amendment on rice growth and nitrogen retention in a waterlogged paddy field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(1), 153-162.
  10. El-Sharkawy, M., El-Naggar, A. H., AL-Huqail, A. A., Ghoneim, A. M. 2022. Acid-Modified Biochar Impacts on Soil Properties and Biochemical Characteristics of Crops Grown in Saline-Sodic Soils. Sustainability, 14(13), 81-90.
  11. 2007. Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable Technol; 31:860– 865use of salt affected soils. Rome, Italy: FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service.
  12. Farrell, M., Macdonald, L. M., Butler, G., Chirino-Valle, I., Condron, L. M. 2014 Biochar and fertiliser applications influence phosphorus fractionation and wheat yield. Biology and fertility of soils, 50 (1):169-178.
  13. Francois, L. E., Grieve, C. M., Maas, E. V. and Lesch, S. M. 1994. Time of salt stress affects growth and yield components of irrigated wheat. Agronomy journal, 86(1), 100-107.
  14. Gomes- Sanchez, D., Vannozzi, G. P., Baldini, M., Tahamasebi Enferadi, S. and Dell Vedove, G. Effect of soil water availability in sunflower lines derived from interspecific crosses. Italian Joumal of Agronomy. 371-387.
  15. Gomez‐Pando, L. 2015. Quinoa breeding. Quinoa: Improvement and sustainable production, 87-108.
  16. Gunes, A., A. Inal., M. B. Taskin., O. Sahin., E. C. Kaya, and A. Atakol. 2014. Effect of phosphorus enriched biochar and poultry manure on growth and mineral composition of lettuce (Lactuca sativa Lcv.) grown in alkaline soil. Soil Use and Management. 30:182–84.
  17. Inal, A., Gunes, A., Sahin, O. Z. G. E., Taskin, M. B., Kaya, E. C. 2015 Impacts of biochar and processed poultry manure, applied to a calcareous soil, on the growth of bean and maize. Soil Use and Management, 31 (1): 106-113.  
  18. Ippolito, J., Novak, J., Busscher, W., Ahmedna, M., Rehrah, D., and Watts, D. 2012. Switchgrass biochar effects two aridisols. Journal of Environmental Quality. 41: 1123-1130.
  19. Jiang, Z., Lian, F., Wang, Z., Xing, B. 2020. The role of biochars in sustainable crop production and soil resiliency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(2), 520-542.
  20. Komkiene, J., Baltrenaite, E. 2016. Biochar as adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions [Cadmium (II), Copper (II), Lead (II), Zinc (II)] from aqueous phase. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13(2), 471-482.
  21. Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., Crowley, D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil biology and biochemistry, 43(9), 1812-1836.
  22. Lehmann, J., Rondon, M. 2006 Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems, 113-517. e530.
  23. Leng, L., Huang, H., Li, H., Li, J., Zhou, W. 2019. Biochar stability assessment methods: a review. Science of the total environment, 647, 210-222.
  24. Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Soloman, D., Kingangi, J., Grossman, J., O'Neill, B. Skjemstad, J,O., Thies, J., Luizao, F.Y., Petersen, , Neves, E.G. 2006 Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in Soils. Soil Science and Society of American Journal. 70:1719-1730. doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0383.
  25. Lindsay, W.L., and Norvell, W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 42:3. 421-428.
  26. Liu, Y., Lu, H., Yang, S., Wang, Y. 2016. Impacts of biochar addition on rice yield and soil properties in a cold waterlogged paddy for two crop seasons. Field crops research, 191, 161-167.
  27. Lu, S. G., Sun, F. F., Zong, Y. T. 2014 Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (Vertisol). Catena, 114: 37-44. org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.014
  28. Mohkami, A., Yazdanpanah, N., Saidenjad, A. The effect of vermicompost and biochar application on the morphophysiological characteristics of quinoa under drought stress conditions. Iran journal of water and soil research, 1401; 53(1): 14-129
  29. Munns, R., Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance.  Rev. Plant Biol., 59, 651-681.
  30. Namgay, T., Singh, B., Singh, B. P. 2010 Influence of biochar application to soil on the availability of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to maize (Zea mays L.). Soil Research, 48 (7): 638-647.
  31. Novak, J. M., Busscher, W. J., Laird, D. L., Ahmedna, M., Watts, D. W., Niandou, M. A. 2009 Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil science, 174 (2): 105-112.
  32. Oladele, S.O.; Adeyemo, A.J.; Awodun, M.A. Influence of rice husk biochar and inorganic fertilizer on soil nutrients availability and rain-fed rice yield in two contrasting soils. Geoderma 2019, 336, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  33. Olsen, S. R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate(No. 939). US Department of Agriculture.
  34. Oo, A.N., Iwai, C.B., Saenjan, P., 2015. Soil properties and maize growth in saline and nonsaline soils using cassava-industrial waste compost and vermicompost with or without earthworms. Land Degrad. Dev. 26, 300–310.
  35. Paradelo, R., Vázquez-Nion, D., Silva, B., González, Á., Barral, M.T., 2016. Acidification of mixtures of granite powder and compost for reuse in plant production. Comp. Sci. Uti. 643 24, 1-10
  36. Park, J. H., Choppala, G. K., Bolan, N. S., Chung, J. W., Chuasavathi, T. 2011 Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant and soil, 348(1-2): 439.
  37. Park, J. H., Choppala, G., Lee, S. J., Bolan, N., Chung, J. W., Edraki, M. 2013 Comparative sorption of Pb and Cd by biochars and its implication for metal immobilization in soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 224 (12): 1711.
  38. Peiris, C., Nayanathara, O., Navarathna, C. M., Jayawardhana, Y., Nawalage, S., Burk. Mlsna, T. E. 2019. The influence of three acid modifications on the physicochemical characteristics of tea-waste biochar pyrolyzed at different temperatures: a comparative study. RSC advances, 9(31): 17612-17622.
  39. Prager, A., Munz, S., Nkebiwe, P., Mast, B. and Graeff-Honninger, S. (2018) Yield and quality characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under field conditions in Southwestern Germany. Agronomy8: 197-216.
  40. Pulvento, C., Riccardi, M., Lavini, A., Iafelice, G., Marconi, E., d’Andria, R. 2012. Yield and quality characteristics of quinoa grown in open field under different saline and non‐saline irrigation regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 198(4), 254-263
  41. .Qiu, N. and C. Lu. 2003. Enhanced tolerance of photosynthesis against high temperature damage in salt‐adapted halophyte Atriplex centralasiatica plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 26(7): 1137-1145.
  42. Ramzani, P. M. A., Khan, W. U. D., Iqbal, M., Kausar, S., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Virk, Z. A. 2016. Effect of different amendments on rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth, yield, nutrient uptake and grain quality in Ni-contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(18), 18585-18595.
  43. Ramzani, P. M. A., Shan, L., Anjum, S., Ronggui, H., Iqbal, M., Virk, Z. A., Kausar, S. 2017. Improved quinoa growth, physiological response, and seed nutritional quality in three soils having different stresses by the application of acidified biochar and compost. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 116, 127-138.
  44. Rhoades, J. D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 417-435.
  45. Sahin, O., Taskin, M. B., Kaya, E. C., Atakol, O., Emir, E., Inal, A., Gunes, A. 2017. Effect of acid modification of biochar on nutrient availability and maize growth in a calcareous soil. Soil Use and Management, 33(3), 447-456.
  46. Schmidt H.P., Kammann C., Niggli C., Evangelou M.W., Mackie K.A., and Abiven S. 2014. Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments to a vineyard soil: Influences on plant growth, nutrient uptake, plant health and grape quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 191: 117-123.
  47. Schulz, H., and B. Glaser. 2012. Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiments. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 175:410–22. doi:10.1002/jpln. v175.3
  48. Silber, A., Levkovitch, I., Graber, E. R. 2010. pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environmental science & technology, 44(24), 9318-9323.
  49. Song, W., Guo, M. 2012. Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of analytical and applied pyrolysis, 94, 138-145.
  50. Srivastava, P.K., Gupta, M., Singh, N., Tewari, S.K., 2016. Amelioration of sodic soil for wheat cultivation using bioaugmented organic soil amendment. Land Degrad. Dev. 27, 1245–1254.
  51. Sun, C. X., Chen, X., Cao, M. M., Li, M. Q. and Zhang , Y. L. (2017) Growth and metabolic responses of maize roots to straw biochar application at different rates. Journal of Plant and Soil 416: 487 -502.
  52. Tagliavini, M., Masia, A., Quartieri, M. 1995. Bulk soil pH and rhizosphere pH of peach trees in calcareous and alkaline soils as affected by the form of nitrogen fertilizers. Plant and Soil, 176(2), 263-271.
  53. Talebnejad, R., Sepaskhah, A. R. 2015. Effect of different saline groundwater depths and irrigation water salinities on yield and water use of quinoa in lysimeter. Agricultural water management, 148, 177-188.
  54. Taskin, M. B., Kadioglu, Y. K., Sahin, O., Inal, A., Gunes, A. 2019 Effect of Acid Modified Biochar on the Growth and Essential and Non-Essential Element Content of Bean, Chickpea, Soybean, and Maize Grown in Calcareous Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50 (13): 1604-1613.
  55. Turan, V., Khan, S. A., Iqbal, M., Ramzani, P. M. A., Fatima, M. 2018. Promoting the productivity and quality of brinjal aligned with heavy metals immobilization in a wastewater irrigated heavy metal polluted soil with biochar and chitosan. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 161, 409-419.
  56. ur Rehman, M. Z., Batool, Z., Ayub, M. A., Hussaini, K. M., Murtaza, G., Usman, M., ... Ali, S. 2020. Effect of acidified biochar on bioaccumulation of cadmium (Cd) and rice growth in contaminated soil. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 19, 101015.
  57. Uzoma, K. C., M. Inoue., H. Andry., H. Fujimaki., A. Zahoor, and E. Nishihara. 2011. Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use and Management 27:205–12. doi:10.1111/j.1475- 2743.2011.00340.x
  58. Walkley, A., and Black, T.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method, Soil Sci. 37: 29-38.
  59. Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., Joseph., S. 2010 Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature communications, 1 (1):1-9.
  60. Wang, Y., Pan, F., Wang, G., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Mao, Z. 2014. Effects of biochar on photosynthesis and antioxidative system of Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under replant conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 175, 9-15
  61. Xie, T., K.R. Reddy, C. Wang, and K. Xu. 2014. Effects of amendment of biochar produced from woody biomass on soil quality and crop yield. American Society of Civil Engineers. 55(1): 32-36.
  62. Yu, H., Zou, W., Chen, J., Chen, H., Yu, Z., Huang, J., ... Gao, B. 2019. Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: A review. Journal of environmental management, 232, 8-21.

 

مهندسی زراعی
دوره 46، شماره 1
خرداد 1402
صفحه 43-59
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار