نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز ، خوزستان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، خوزستان، ایران

3 استاد گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، خوزستان، ایران

چکیده

نتایج تجزیه خاک‌های کشاورزی ایران سطح متفاوتی از کمبود روی را نشان می‌دهد. این مطالعه با دو هدف (1) اندازه-گیری و تعیین شکل‌های شیمیایی روی در افق‌های مشخصه مالیک، کلسیک و سالیک جمع‌آوری شده از مناطق مختلف در استان خوزستان (2) و بررسی سهم برخی از ویژگی‌های فیزیکی و شیمیایی این خاک‌ها در تعیین فراهمی روی قابل دسترس این خاک‌ها صورت گرفت. بدین منظور و برای کمی‌سازی توزیع روی قابل دسترس در خا‌ک‌های مورد بررسی (با سه تکرار) از روش عصاره‌گیری دنباله-ای تسیر استفاده شد. به منظور برآورد دقت نتایج شش مرحله-ای تسیر یک گرم خاک گواهی شده ایالت مونتانا (ANIST 27 11 A) مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و درصد بازیابی به دست آمده 5/94% بود. از نرم افزار visual MENTEQ نسخه 1/3 برای محاسبه گونه‌های روی غالب در محلول تعادلی استفاده شد. پارامترهای Zn2+, Ca2+, Mg2+ ,Na+, K+, PO43−, SO42-, Cl−, ، EC و pHبه عنوان ورودی‌های مدل استفاده شدند. نتایج جزءبندی روی نشان داد که شکل‌های آلی، کربناتی و اکسیدی در افق مالیک و کلسیک و شکل‌های کربناتی، اکسیدی و تبادلی در افق سالیک شکل‌های غالب و مؤثر روی قابل دسترس گیاه می-باشند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد گونه‌هایZn2+, Zn(OH)2(aq), Zn-DOM (aq), وZn (OH)+ گونه‌های غالب روی در همه افق‌های مشخصه انتخابی هستند. نتایج حاصل از محاسبات فاکتور تحرک عنصر روی با افزودن 10 میلی گرم به کیلوگرم خاک سولفات روی نشان از مقادیر کم‌تر فاکتور تحرک در افق مشخصه مالیک نسبت به کلسیک و سالیک بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing Zn speciation and fractionation in selected diagnostic horizons from Khuzestan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedh Sanaz Mousavi 1
  • ُSaeid Hojati 2
  • Ahmad Landi 3

1 Former M.Sc. student, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction Soils at the earth crust could be considered as the result of interaction among five soil-forming factors. The strength and weakness of each of these factors causes formation of different soils with different properties and horizons. Previous studies have reported that Iranian agricultural soils show different levels of zinc deficiency. Although the literature review confirms many studies in this regard, the number of studies compared the distribution of the chemical forms of micronutrients and especially zinc after the application of chemical fertilizers in the soils of Khuzestan especially in the common diagnostic horizons of these soils, is limited. Therefore, the purposes of this study were two-fold: (1) to measure and determine the chemical forms of zinc in selected diagnostic horizons (Mollic, Calcic and Salic) of Khuzestan Province, (2) to identify the contribution of some physical and chemical properties of these soils on availability of zinc.
Materials and Methods In order to carry out this research, Mollic and Calcic diagnostic horizons were collected from the Karun 3 watershed in the east of Khuzestan province, with thermic and mesic temperature and xeric moisture regimes. However, Salic diagnostic horizon was sampled from the route between Ahvaz to Abadan in the southwest of the province, with hyperthermic temperature regime and an aridic moisture regime. After being transferred to the laboratory, the samples were first air-dried, and after passing through a 2-mm sieve and before carrying out the fractionation and speciation experiments, their physical and chemical characteristics including electrical conductivity (EC), pH, particle size distribution, organic C content, calcium carbonate equivalent, cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area (SSA), and total and DTPA extractable Zn were determined employing common standard procedures (Table 2). Different forms of zinc in the solid phase of the Mollic, Calcic, and Salic soils were extracted using the method described by Tessier et al. (1979). In brief, 5 components including water soluble, exchangeable, carbonates, iron and manganese oxide, organic and residual forms were determined. The concentration of zinc in the extracts obtained from different stages of successive soil extraction was determined using an atomic absorption device. In order to estimate the accuracy of the extraction method described above, the recovery percentage was calculated. To do this, one gram of a certified soil from the state of Montana (ANIST 2711A) was used and the recovery percentage of zinc in our study was 94.5%. In order to determine the chemical forms of zinc in the solution phase of the soils, 100 g of each soil sample was saturated with double distilled water, and then extracted using a vacuum pump and Buchner funnel. The extracts were passed through filter paper and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 8 minutes, then the values of pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved organic carbon, and dissolved cations and were determined using common laboratory methods described earlier (Table 1). These parameters were considered as input in Visual MINTEQ software to predict zinc species in soil solution (all free and complexed organic and mineral species). The data analysis was conducted considering a factorial design based on a completely randomized design through SAS software (v9.1). The comparison of means was also done using the Tukey’s test at the 5% probability level. Graphs were also drawn using Origin software (v2018).
Results and Discussion Considering the critical level of zinc deficiency in the soil (1 mg/kg), all the soils are deficient in terms of available zinc. The studied soils are among alkaline and calcareous soils, but they did not show any differences from each other in terms of soil texture. It is noteworthy that the mollic horizon has a greater cation exchange capacity and specific surface area than the other two soils due to the higher amount of organic matter and the greater abundance of clay contents. The results of zinc fractionation in the studied soils showed that organic, carbonate and oxide forms in the Mollic and Calcic horizons, and carbonate, oxide and exchangable forms in the Salic horizon were the dominant forms of Zn which affects its supply to the plants. The results also showed that Zn2+, Zn(OH)2(aq), Zn-DOM (aq), and Zn (OH)+ species were the dominant species of Zn in soil solution of all diagnostic horizons. The result of Zn mobility factor calculations with the addition of 10 mg/kg Zn(SO4)2 showed lower values of mobility factor in the mollic diagnostic horizon than those of the calcic and salic.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Available Zn
  • Mollic
  • Salic
  • Calcic
  • Speciation
  • Fractionation
  1. Abdollahi, A., Norouzi Masir, M., Taghavi, M., Moezzi, A.A., 2020. Effects of functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles and zinc sulfate chemical fertilizer on zinc speciation in soil and uptake of zinc in wheat. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 24(2): 87-103.
  2. Acosta, J.A., Jansen, B., Kalbi, K., Faz, A., and Martinez, S. 2001. Salinity increase mobility of heavy metals in soils. Chemosphere 85(8): 1318-1324.
  3. Anegbe, B., Okuo, J.M., Ewekay, E.O., and Ogbeifun, D.E. 2014. Fractionation of lead-acid battery soil amended with Biochar. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 36-43.
  4. Boostani, H.R., Chorom, M., Moezzi, A.A., Karimian, N.A., Enayatizamir, N., Zarei, M., Simulation of Zinc release affected by microbial inoculation and salinity levels in a non-sterile calcareous soil using kinetic models. Journal of Water and Soil, 30(3): 904-919.
  5. Buol, S.W., Southard, R.J., Graham, R.C., and McDanial, P.A. 2003. Soil genesis and classification. 5th edition, Iowa State University Press. 494 p.
  6. Casagrande, J.C., Alleon, L.R.F., Camargo, O .A., and Arnone, A .D. 2004. Effects of pH and ionic strength on zinc sorption by a variable charge soil. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal. 35: 2087-2095.
  7. Chapman, H .D. 1965. Cation exchange capactiy. In: Black, C.A. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Monograph No.9, American Society of Agronomy. Madison, WI, USA, pp. 811– 903.
  8. Dehghani, A., Fotovat, A., Haghnia, G .H and Keshavarz P, 2007. Effect of salinity and cow manure on the concentrations and distribution of species in the soil solution. Sci Tech Agric Natur Resource 41(11): 53-61.
  9. Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle Size Analysis, In: Klute A. (Ed.). Methods of Soi Analysis, Part 1, Am. Soc. Agron. Inc., Madison, WI, USA, pp. 383-411.
  10. Ghani, W.A.W.A.K., Mohd, A., da Silva, G., Bachmann, R.T., Taufiq-Yap, Y.H., Rashid, U., and Al-Muhtaseb.A.H., 2013. Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: Chemical and Physical Characterization. Industrial Crops and Products, 44: 18-24.
  11. Haffeez, F.Y., Abaid-Ullah, M., Hassan, M.N. 2013. Plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria as zinc mobilizers: a promising approach for cereals bio fortification. Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Productivity, pp. 217-235.
  12. Hamzehnezhad, R., Sepehr, E., Samadi, A., Rasouli Sadaghiani, M.H., Khodaverdiloo, H., 2018. Effect of nano zero-valent iron particles (nZVI) on mobility and chemical forms of cadmium and lead in soil. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 49(3): 549-559.
  13. Hinsinger, P. 2001. Bioavailability of trace element as related to root-induced chemical changed in the rhizosphere in: Hooda, P.S., (Ed), Trace Elements in Soils. John Wiley & Sons publication, pp. 25- 41.
  14. Kamali, S., Ronaghi, A. and Karimian, N., 2011. Soil Zinc Transformations as Affected by Applied Zinc and Organic Materials. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42(9): 1038-1049.
  15. Karimi, A., Moezzi, A.A., Chorom, M., Enayatizamir, N., 2019. Effects of sugarcane bagasse derived biochar on distribution of Zinc fractions in a calcareous soil. Journal of Water and Soil, 33(3): 445-461.
  16. Kidd, P.J., Barcelo, M.P., Bernal, F., Navari-Izzo, C., Poschenrieder, S., Shilev, R., Clemente, and Monterroso, C. 2009. Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation. Environmental Explorer of Botany, 67: 243–259.
  17. Loeppert, R.H., and Suarez, D.L. 1996. Carbonate and gypsum, In: Sparks D.L. (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Am. Soc. Agron. Inc., Madison, WI. USA. pp. 437-474.
  18. Lu, Y, Zhu, F., Chen, J., Gan, H., and Guo, Y. 2007. Chemical fractionation of heavy metals in urban soils of Guangzhou, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 11: 362- 378.
  19. Malakouti, M.J., Homaei, M., 2004. Soils fertility in arid and semi-arid regions. 2nd edition, Tarbiat Modarress University Press, 754 p.
  20. Marschner, P., 2012. Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London.
  21. National Research Council, 1993. Soil and water quality. An agenda For agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  22. Obrador, A., J. Novillo, and M. Alvarez. 2003. Mobility and availability to plants of two zinc sources applied to calcareous soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67:564-572.
  23. Parizanganeh, A., Lakhan, V. C and Jalalian, H., 2007. A geochemical and statistical approach for assessing heavy metal pollution in sediments from southern Caspian coast. International J Env Sci Technol 4: 351-358.
  24. Parker, D.R., NoNell, W.A., and Chaney, R.L. 1995. GEOCHEM-PC- A chemical Speciation Program for IBM and Compatible Personal Computers. Chemical Equilibrium and Reaction Models, 42: 253-269.
  25. Plum, L. M, Rink, L., Haase, H. 2010. The essential Toxin: impact of zinc on human health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7: 1342-1365.
  26. Ramos, L, Hernandez, L .M and Gonzaalez, M. J., 1994. Sequential fraction of Cu, Pb, Cd and Zn in soils from or near Donana National Park. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23: 50-57.
  27. Rattan, R.K. and Sharma, P.D., 2004. Main micronutrients available and their method of use. Proceedings IFA International Symposium on Micronutrients. 23-25 February, New Delhi, India, pp. 1-10.
  28. Ravikovitch, S., Margolin, M., and Navrot, J., 1968. Zinc availability in calcareous soils: I. comparison of chemical extraction methods for estimation of plant availability zinc. Soil Sci 105: 57-61.
  29. Rhoades, J. D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. P. 417-436. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part III, 3rd Ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.
  30. Rupa, T .R., Tomar, K .P., Damidar Reddy, D., and Subba Rao, A. 2000. Time-dependent zinc desorption in soils. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analaysis, 31: 2547-2563.
  31. Sekhon, K. S., J. P., Singh, and D. S. Mehla. 2006. Long-term effect of organic, inorganic input on the distribution of zinc and copper in soil fractions under a rice-wheat cropping system. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 52: 551-556.
  32. Shahbazi, K. and Besharati, H. 2013. Review of Iran Agricultural Soils Fertility Status. Scientific- Promotion Journal of Land Management, 1: 1-15 (In Persion).
  33. Sharifi, M., M., Afyuni, and A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh. 2011. Effects of Sewage Sludge, Compost and Cow Manure on Availability of Soil Fe and Zn and their Uptake by Corn, Alfalfa and Tagetes Flower. Journal of Water and Soil Science. 15(56): 141-154.
  34. Shuman, L.M. and Hargrove, W.L. 1985. Effect of tillage on the distribution of manganese, copper, iron and zinc in soil fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 49: 1117 – 1121.
  35. Soltani Tehrani, S., 2013. The effect of pre-planting and plant residue management on zinc element speciation in soil solution and amino acids concentration in the rhizosphere of two wheat cultivars. M.Sc. Thesis, Isfahan University of Technology
  36. Tagwira, F., Riho M and Mugwira L, 1992. Effect of PH and phosphorous and organic matter on zinc availability and distribution in two Zimbabwean soils. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 23: 1485-1491.
  37. Tessier, A., Campbell P. G. C., and Bisson, M., 1979. Sequential extraction procedures for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51: 844-51.
  38. Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L., Beaton, J.D., and Halvin, J.L. 1990. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. 5th, McMillan Publication Co., New York.
  39. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks, D.L., et al., (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3-American Society of Agronomy, Madison. WI, USA, pp. 475- 490.
  40. Walkley, A., and Black, I .A. 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 34: 29-38.
  41. Weng, L.P., Temminghoff, E.J.M., Lofts, S., Tipping, E., and Van Riemsdijk, W.H. 2002. Complexation with dissolved organic matter and solubility control of heavy metals in a sandy soil. Environment Science Technology, 36: 4804-4810.
  42. Yang, X., Lu, k., McGrouther, K., Che, L., Lu, G., Wang, Q., Liu, X., Shen, L., Huang, H., Ye, Z., and Wang, H. 2017. Bioavailability of cd and Zn in soils treated with biochars derived from tobacco stalk and dead pigs. Journal of Soils and Sediments 17(3):751-762.
  43. Zinati, G.M., Li, Y. and Bryan, H .H, 2001. Accumulation and fractionation of copper, iron, manganese and zinc in calcareous soils amended with compost. J Environ Sci Health 36: 229-243.