نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

چکیده

با وجود اهمیت و جایگاه خرما در کشور و جهان، تولید خرما به ویژه عملیات دسترسی به تاج نخل خرما به عنوان گسترده‌ترین و دشوارترین عملیات تولید خرما، به صورت سنتی و همراه با مخاطرات ارگونومیکی و ایمنی متعددی انجام می‌شود. در مطالعه حاضر، برخی مداخلات ارگونومیکی با سازوکار غیرپیچیده در عملیات دسترسی به تاج نخل خرما با به کارگیری 9 شرکت‌کننده با هدف کاهش مخاطرات بررسی و از حیث شاخص‌های ارگونومیکی، ایمنی و فنی با روش مرسوم مقایسه شد. ارزیابی‌های بیومکانیکی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار 3DSSPP و بررسی تنش‌های مکانیکی وارد بر ابزار صورت گرفت. تجزیه و تحلیل‌های آماری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار IBM SPSS 24 انجام شد. ارزیابی‌های بیومکانیکی نشان داد که از بین چهار روش مورد بررسی صعود از نخل خرما (مرسوم (استفاده از پروند) و مداخله‌ای (پروند+کفش لاستیکی، هارنس و هارنس+کفش لاستیکی))، روش‌های مرسوم و پروند+کفش لاستیکی به ترتیب با وارد آوردن نیروهای برشی 9/1120 و 6/1119 نیوتون بر دیسک L5/S1 از این منظر از دو روش دیگر که در آن‌ها از هارنس استفاده می‌شد به طور معنی‌داری (001/0>p ) پرخطرتر و دارای ریسک ابتلا به آسیب زیاد (500 نیوتون ) بودند. روش هارنس+کفش لاستیکی به لحاظ ارجحیت بالاترین میزان (14 امتیاز) را به خود اختصاص داد. ابزار‌های مداخله‌ای به لحاظ ایمنی وضعیت به نسبت مطلوب‌تری از روش مرسوم داشت، اما به لحاظ ارگونومیکی شرایط تقریباً برابر بود. با این وجود، ابزارهای مداخله‌ای به لحاظ سرعت کار و شرایط فنی دارای کاستی‌هایی بود که باید تا رسیدن به شرایط مطلوب مورد مطالعه و بهسازی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of some ergonomic interventions in date palm crown access operation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdollah Hayati 1
  • Afshin Marzban 2
  • Majid Rahnama 2

1 Agricultural sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuestan

2 Associated Professor, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan

چکیده [English]

Introduction Date fruit production has an important position in either Iran or the world. Life and economy of many of people who live in the West Asia and North Africa (WANA) depend on this agricultural product. Date palm crown access, as one of important operations of date fruit production, is performed in a traditional manner with a tool talked “Parvand” yet. It results in various ergonomic and safety problems, such as fall from height, sunstroke, and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Meanwhile, mechanization could not adequately adopted by date palm growers. Possibly, ergonomic interventions in forms of simple tools mitigate ergonomic and safety problems in date palm crown access operation.
Materials and Methods In this study, some ergonomic interventions were investigated to improve the present status of ergonomic and safety status of this operation with employing nine workers from Ramshir city, Khuzestan province, Iran. Evaluated date palm climbing tools were as follows: Parvand (traditional tool), Parvand+rubber shoes (intervened tool), harness (intervened tool), and harness+rubber shoes (intervened tool). Parvand consisted of a backrest and a towing wire. In two last mentioned intervened tools, harness was replaced with backrest in Parvand. Indeed, harness was the brief name of composition of harness and towing wire. Comparisons were done based on some ergonomic, safety, bio-mechanical, and technical indices. Ergonomic evaluations included physical and cognitive ones. Body discomfort (BD), heart rate (HR), worker energy expenditure (EE), working oral temperature (OT), and physiological strain index (PSI) were the physical indices. Perception-based heat Strain Index (PeSI) and acceptance of climbing tools in view of workers were the cognitive Indices. Acceptance comprised workers’ perception about safety, work speed, ease of use, technical properties, and preference of the tools. Safety evaluation was conducted using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) which resulted in a risk priority number (RPN) for each climbing tools. Bio-mechanical evaluations were performed using 3DSSPP software (to find the compression and shear forces on L5/S1 disc) and the investigation of mechanical stresses of Parvand and harness (to achieve the factor of safety (FoS) of tools). Technical index was the total time cycle (TTC) to perform date palm crown access (install climbing tool, ascending, and descending). Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS 24. During evaluation, workers’ qualitative feedbacks around intervened tools were recorded.
Results and Discussion Mean age, height, mass and body mass index of workers were 33.1 years, 1.71 m, 74.0 kg, and 25.3 kg/m2, respectively. According to the statistical analyses, there was no any significant difference among climbing tools regarding BD, HR, EE, OT, PSI, PeSI, RPN, and TTC. Bio-mechanical evaluations showed that all four climbing tool caused a low risk compression force on L5/S1 (<3400), whereas interventions including harness were significantly higher than those including Parvand. Traditional and Parvand+rubber shoes with shear forces of 1120.9 and 1119.6 N, respectively, on L5/S1 disk resulted in high injury risk (>500 N) and were significantly higher than other two methods in which harness was used (p<0.001). FoS was achieved for Parvand and harness 1.21 and 3.53, respectively. Therefore, only harness could cover the minimum FoS required to work in height (2.4) according Ministry of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare’s regulations. During cognitive evaluations, harness+rubber shoes gained the highest safety level (score of 17) as well as the highest preference level (score of 14), whilst, Parvand+rubber shoes had the highest cognitive-based acceptance score (score of 58). Workers’ qualitative feedbacks, in order of frequency, were as follow: harness ropes should be wider (33%); towing wire-harness joint should be upper (from pelvis toward waist) (22%); harness ropes should be softer (especially around the thighs) (22%); harness should be integrated (i.e. without rope, like a short) from pelvis to thighs (11%); rope buckle should be used so that harness is more easily-and fast worn (11%).
Conclusion Safety and work speed can be two main factors in the preference of a date palm crown access tool. Overall, intervened tools had a better state concerning safety, whereas, the qualifications were almost equal considering ergonomics. Notwithstanding it, the intervened tools had the lacks around work speed and technical properties which should be amended. Besides the attempts for development of date palm mechanization, further studies may be conducted on intervened date palm climbing tools, especially harness+rubber shoes method, based on workers’ qualitative feedbacks to gain a more appropriated level.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agricultural mechanization. Safety assessment
  • Date palm orchard
  • Intervention acceptance
  • Simple tool
  • Parvand and Harness
  1. Abdelouahhab, Z., and Arias-Jimenez, E.J. 2002. Date palm cultivation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Agricultural Services, Bulletin No. 156. FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/Y4360E/y4360e00.htm (accessed November 2018)
  2. Asadi, N., Choobineh, A., Keshavarzi, S., and Daneshmandi, H. 2015. Estimation of forces exerted on the lower back in manual load lifting using 3DSSPP software. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics, 2(4): 25-31.
  3. Ashraf, Z., and Hamidi-Esfahani, Z. 2011. Date and date processing: a review. Food Reviews International, 27 (2): 101-133.
  4. Ayyub, B. M. 2014. Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, USA. 642p.
  5. 2012. ASTM A36 Mild/Low Carbon Steel. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6117 (accessed February 2020)
  6. Beer, F.P., Russell Johnston, E. Jr., Dewolf, J.T., and Mazurek, D.F. 2012. Mechanics of materials, 6th McGraw Hill, New York, USA. 838p.
  7. Bourbonnais, R., Zayed, J., Levesque, M., Busque, M-A., Duguay, P., and Truchon, G. 2013. Identification of workers exposed concomitantly to heat stress and chemicals. Industrial Health, 51 (1): 25-33
  8. Earle-Richardson, G., Jenkins, P., Fulmer, S., Mason, C., Burdick, P., and May, J. 2005. An ergonomic intervention to reduce back strain among apple harvest workers in New York State. Applied Ergonomics, 36 (3): 327-334.
  9. Eydizadeh, M, Sheikhdavoodi, M.J., and Salehisahlabadi, A. 2014. Ergonomic Evaluation of the Posture of Dates Packinghouse Workers by REBA Method. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Soil Science and Agricultural Mechanization, (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 37(1): 13-22.
  10. Fathallah, F.A., Miller, B.J., and Miles, J. A. 2008. Low back disorders in agriculture and the role of stooped work: scope, potential interventions, and research needs. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 14 (2): 221-245.
  11. Fathallah, F.A., Tang, S.C., and Waters, T. 2016. Development and evaluation of ergonomic interventions for bucket handling on farms. Human Factors, 58 (5): 758-776.
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2018. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed February 2020)
  13. Hayati, A. 2018. A review on the reasons of existence of ergonomic strain in the agricultural sector despite mechanization development. 1st Conference on Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of Iran. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran. 30 January.
  14. Hayati, A., and Marzban, A. 2021. Ergonomic problems in agricultural farms: explainable linkage between awkward postures and body discomforts in Iranian leafy vegetable cultivation. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation. [Accepted]
  15. Hayati, A., and Marzban, A. Linkage between machine power utilization and ergonomics, with reference to reducing exertions at work. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation, 67(4): 949–957.
  16. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Asoodar, M.A. 2015. Ergonomic assessment of hand cow milking operations in Khuzestan province of Iran. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 17 (2): 140-145.
  17. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Asoodar, M.A. 2015. Ergonomic evaluation of hand and mechanized milking in dairy farms. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics, 3(3): 65-75.
  18. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Asoodar, M.A. 2020. Workplace and Gravity: Two Mechanized Cow Milking Systems Compared for Human Physiological Strains. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 12(1): 21-32.
  19. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Leylizadeh, M. 2018. Discovering the physical onerous activities in manual sesame seed harvest using postural analysis. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 20 (4): 126-131.
  20. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Rahnama, M. 2020. Strategic analysis of ergonomic and safety problems in mechanization of date palm crown access operation with the sustainable agricultural development approach. Iran Occupational Health, 17(1): 1-16.
  21. Hayati, A., Marzban, A., and Rahnama, M. 2021. Occupational safety and health in traditional date palm works. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94: 1455-1473.
  22. Health and Safety Authority. 2019. Fatal Accidents. https://www.hsa.ie/eng/Your_Industry/Agriculture_Forestry/Further_Information/Fatal_Accidents/ (accessed February 2020)
  23. Hwang, J., Kong, Y.K., and Jung, M.C. 2010. Posture evaluations of tethering and loose-housing systems in dairy farms. Applied Ergonomics, 42 (1): 1-8.
  24. Jena, S., Kumar, A., Singh, J.K., and Mani, I., 2016. Biomechanical model for energy consumption in manual load carrying on Indian farms. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 55: 69-76.
  25. Jurca, R., Jackson, A.S., LaMonte, M.J., Morrow Jr, J.R., Blair, S.N., Wareham, N.J., Haskell, W.L., van Mechelen, W., Church, T.S., Jakicic, J.M., and Laukkanen, R. 2005. Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29 (3): 185-193.
  26. Keytel, L.R., Goedecke, J.H., Noakes, T.D., Hiiloskorpi, H., Laukkanen, R., Van Der Merwe, L., and Lambert, E.V. 2005. Prediction of energy expenditure from heart rate monitoring during submaximal exercise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23 (3): 289-297.
  27. Marzban A, Hayati A. 2018. Ergonomic Evaluation of Traditional Date Fruit Harvesting. Iranian Journal of Ergonomics, 6: 11-20.
  28. Marzban, A., and Hayati, A. 2014. Ergonomic Assessment of Manual Harvesting of Date Palm. 1st International Scientific Conference on Applied Sciences and Engineering. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 20-21 December.
  29. Marzban, A., and Hayati, A. 2016. Ergonomics and sustainability: towards more sustainable date palm production systems. Ajman 4th International Environment Conference. Ajman. 2-3 March.
  30. Ministry of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare. 2012. Safety of Work in Height Regulations. Ministry of Cooperative, Labor and Social Welfare, Tehran, Iran. 65p. https://www.mcls.gov.ir/icm_content/media/law/636629376165060360.pdf (accessed March 2020)
  31. Mokdad, M., 2004. Heat stress in date-palm workplaces: a study in the Algerian oases. African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety, 14 (2): 34-36.
  32. Mokdad, M., Bouhafs, M., Lahcene, B., and Mokdad, I. 2019. Ergonomic practices in Africa: date palm agriculture in Algeria as an example. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation, 62 (4): 657–665.
  33. Momeni, Z., Choobineh, A., Razeghi, M., Ghaem, H., Azadian, F., and Daneshmandi, H. 2020. Work-Related musculoskeletal symptoms among agricultural workers: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Journal of Agromedicine, 25 (3): 339-348.
  34. Monjezi, N. 2019. Analysis of occupational risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the sugarcane workers using QEC and Nordic questionnaire. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Soil Science and Agricultural Mechanization, (Scientific Journal of Agriculture), 42(3): 97-112.
  35. Moran, D.S., Shitzer, A., and Pandolf, K.B. 1998. A physiological strain index to evaluate heat stress. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 275 (1): R129-R134.
  36. Mostaan, A. 2006. Evaluation and Comparison of Date Palm Frond Stub Cutting Methods. The Scientific Journal of Agriculture, 29 (2): 105-115.
  37. Mostaan, A., Marashi, S.S. and Ahmadizadeh, S. 2010. Development of a new date palm pollinator. In: Proceeding of 4th International Date Palm Production. United Arab Emirates, Abu Dabie. March 15-17. Acta Horticulturae, 882: 315-320.
  38. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1981. Work practices guide for manual lifting, publication No. 81—122. NIOSH, Virginia, USA. 198p.
  39. Nawi, N.M., Yahya, A., Chen, G., Bockari-Gevao, S.M., and Maraseni, T.N. 2012. Human energy expenditure in lowland rice cultivation in Malaysia. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 18 (1): 45-56.
  40. Nithyashri, J., and Kulanthaivel, G. 2012. Classification of human age based on Neural Network using FG-NET Aging database and Wavelets. In 2012 Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC). Chennai, India. 13-15 December.
  41. Pizzol, D., Smith, L., Fontana, L., Caruso, M.G., Bertoldo, A., Demurtas, J., McDermott, D., Garolla, A., Grabovac, I., and Veronese, N. 2020. Associations between body mass index, waist circumference and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and META-analysis. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 21 (4): 657-666.
  42. Ramana, C., and Ananthakrishnan, D. 2002. Modified handhoe handle for operational Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 17 (1): 28-32.
  43. Raposo, P.C., Correia, J.A., Sousa, D., Salavessa, M.E., Reis, C., Oliveira, C., and de Jesus, A. 2017. Mechanical Properties of Wood Construction Materials from a Building from the 19th Century. Procedia Structural Integrity, 5: 1097-1101.
  44. Roquelaure, Y., Jégo, S., Geoffroy-Perez, B., Chazelle, E., Descatha, A., Evanoff, B., Garlantézec, R., and Bodin, J. 2020. Carpal tunnel syndrome among male French farmers and agricultural workers: Is it only associated with physical exposure? Safety and Health at Work, 11 (1): 33-40.
  45. Souza, C.D.R., and Silva, R.A.V. 2012. Impacts of introducing a new tool for the manual harvesting of sugar cane: the ergonomic analysis contribution. Work, 41 (Supplement 1): 4967-4970.
  46. Subramaniam, S.R., Samykano, M., Selvamani, S.K., Ngui, W.K., Kadirgama, K., Sudhakar, K., and Idris, M. S. 2019. Preliminary investigations of polylactic acid (PLA) properties. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive Innovation Green Energy Vehicle. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2059. American Institute of Physics Publishing, USA.
  47. Tikuisis, P., McLellan, T. and Selkirk, G. 2002. Perceptual versus physiological heat strain during exercise-heat stress. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34 (9): 1454-1461.
  48. Tiwari, P.S., Pandey, M.M., Gite, L.P., and Shrivastava, A.K. 2014. An ergonomic intervention in operation of a rotary maize sheller. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84 (7): 791-795.
  49. Vanderwal, L., Rautiainen, R., Kuye, R., Peek-Asa, C., Cook, T., Ramirez, M., Culp, K., and Donham, K. 2011. Evaluation of long-and short-handled hand hoes for land preparation, developed in a participatory manner among women vegetable farmers in The Gambia. Applied Ergonomics, 42 (5): 749-756.
  50. Vanderwal, L., Rautiainen, R., Ramirez, M., Kuye, R., Peek-Asa, C., Cook, T., Culp, K., and Donham, K. 2011. Participatory approach to identify interventions to improve the health, safety, and work productivity of smallholder women vegetable farmers in the Gambia. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 24 (1): 36-47.
  51. Wilson, J.R., and Sharples, S. 2015. Evaluation of Human Work. CRC Press, New York USA. 1018p.
  52. Zhang, K., Li, W., Zheng, Y., Yao, W., and Zhao, C. 2020. Dynamic constitutive model of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE): Considering the temperature and strain rate effects. Polymers, 12 (7).