Agricultural Engineering

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

The effect of earthworm and application of cow manure and its biochar on aggregate associated carbon and some soil physical properties

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 MSc. graduate of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Soil Science, Water and Soil Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Introduction Traditional organic manure can be potentially beneficial for soil physical, chemical and biological properties by improving organic matter of soils. Recently, biochar, a carbon rich product of biomass produced by thermochemical conversion under oxygen-limited conditions, has been studied for its effects as a soil amendment. The use of a modified form of manure as manure biochar for soil improvement reduces some environmental, food safety and disposal problems of manures. However, biochar application has been shown to have a positive and negative effect on soil fauna such as earthworm depending on the type of feedstock for its production. Since earthworm function affects physical properties and amount of organic carbon of soils and because of the different effect of biochar and its feedstock on earthworm activity, this study hypothesizes that earthworm may differently alter soil physical properties and aggregates associated carbon in the biochar and its feedstock amended soils. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of cow manure and its biochar in the presence and absence of earthworm on bulk density, total porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, aggregate stability and content of organic carbon in soil aggregates during 30 and 90 days incubation.
Materials and Methods A completely randomized design with 2×4×2 factorial treatment combination was used in triplicates. Treatment variants examined in this study included the following: (i) 2 levels of amendment type (cow manure and its biochar), (ii) 4 levels of applied amendment rate (0, 1, 2 and 5%), (iii) 2 levels of earthworm (with and without earthworm). The biochar was produced from cow manure (passed through 2 mm mesh) by slow pyrolysis at 450 °C. For this experiment, the soil sample was passed through 4 mm mesh. Then, amended soil and the control were moistened up to 70% water holding capacity. Then 5 adult Eisenia fetida with fully-developed clitellum and similar weight were added to half of them. Treatments were then incubated at laboratory temperature and constant moisture for 30 and 90 days. Based on evaporation loss, the soil moisture was kept constant by regular weighing of each pot. At the end of each time (30 and 90 days), samples were taken from different treatments to determine bulk density, total porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity. Also, soil aggregates were separated by wet sieving, then aggregate size distribution was determined and mean weight diameter (MWD) was calculated, also organic carbon content in each aggregate size fraction was determined.
Results and Discussion The results showed that the application of both organic amendments was effective in decreasing soil bulk density, increasing total porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity and aggregate stability, but the effects of organic amendments on these physical properties were more pronounced in cow manure- than biochar-amended soils. Further reduction in bulk density following manure application is attributed to a dilution effect, resulting from mixing of the lighter material of manure with denser mineral fractions of the soil. In addition, cow manure has more content of organic carbon than its biochar which can increase total porosity by promoting aggregation. The greater porosity and aggregation of soils as affected by the application of organic amendments are apparently responsible for the increased saturated hydraulic conductivity. The results showed that the effect of cow manure on the soil physical properties reduced with time more rapidly than its biochar. It might be attributed to lower stability of manure to degradation than biochar in soils because manure contains higher content of labile organic compounds compared to biochar. Our results also showed that application of organic amendments led to increase organic carbon in soil aggregates, especially in 4-2 mm aggregates, indicating that the large macro-aggregates can be considered as a susceptible indicator to organic carbon managements in soil. Also, the organic carbon content of 4-2, 2-0.25 and 0.25-0.05 mm aggregates was 42.8, 27.8 and 20.8% (in 30 days incubation) and 27.2, 28.6% and 20.6% (in 90 days of incubation) higher in cow manure- than biochar-amended soils. The results also showed that earthworm reduced soil bulk density, increased total porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity and aggregate stability regardless of soil amendment but such effect on bulk density and total porosity was more pronounced in cow manure- than biochar-amended soils. It means that type of organic amendments can influence on earthworm activity, thereby altering some soil physical properties. Also, earthworm led to increase carbon content in soil aggregates, especially in smaller aggregates.
Conclusion The results showed that although application of cow manure improved soil physical properties more than cow manure biochar at both incubation times, it seems that cow manure biochar has a more stable effect on the soil physical properties over time. Also, application of organic amendments can lead to increase soil organic carbon by further increasing C in larger aggregates. Other results indicated that the improving effect of earthworm on soil physical properties (except for bulk density and total porosity) did not depend on the type of applied organic amendment in soil. The effect of earthworm on bulk density and total porosity was more pronounced in soils amended with cow manure than its biochar. Also, it is thought that earthworm increases organic carbon in soil by physical stabilization of organic carbon in soil aggregates, especially in smaller aggregates.

Keywords

References

  1. References

    1. Al-Maliki, S., and Scullion, J. 2013. Interactions between earthworms and residues of differing quality affecting aggregate stability and microbial dynamics. Applied Soil Ecology, 64: 56-62.
    2. Are, K.S., Adelana, A.O., Fademi, I. O., and Aina, O.A. 2017. Improving physical properties of degraded soil: Potential of poultry manure and biochar. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 51(6): 454-462.
    3. Asghari, Sh., and Najafian, M. 2015. Interactive effects of organic matters and earthworm on some physical and chemical properties of two soils under different compaction conditions. Applied Soil Research, 3: 89-102. (In Persian with English abstract).
    4. Bhadauria, T., and Saxena, K.G. 2010. Role of earthworms in soil fertility maintenance through the production of biogenic structures. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 2010, 1-8.
    5. Barnes, R.T., Gallaghe, M.E., Masiello, C.A., Liu, Z., and Dugan, B. 2014. Biochar-induced changes in soil hydraulic conductivity and dissolved nutrient fluxes constrained by laboratory experiments. PLoS One, 9: 1-9.
    6. Blanco-Canqui, H. 2017. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4): 687-711.
    7. Burt, R. 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual: Soil survey investigations. Version 4.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Nebraska, United States.
    8. Busscher, W.J., Novak, J.M., Evans, D.E., Watts, D.W., Niandou, M., and Ahmedna, M. 2010. Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Science, 175:10-14.
    9. Bossuyt, H., Six, J., and Hendrix, P.F. 2005. Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(2): 251-258.
    10. Chaudhuri, P.S. 2012. Effects of five earthworm species on some physico-chemical properties of soil. Journal of Environmental Biology, 33: 713-716.
    11. Coq, S., Barthès, B.G., Oliver, R., Rabary, B., and Blanchart, E. 2007. Earthworm activity affects soil aggregation and organic matter dynamics according to the quality and localization of crop residues- an experimental study (Madagascar). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(8): 2119-2128.
    12. Gelik, I., Ortas, I., and Kilik, S. 2004. Effect of compost, Mycorhiza, Manure and fertilizer on some physical properties of Chromoxerert soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 78: 59-67.
    13. Hansen, V., Müller-Stöver, D., Munkholm, L.J., Peltre, C., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., and Jensen, L.S. 2016. The effect of straw and wood gasification biochar on carbon sequestration, selected soil fertility indicators and functional groups in soil: An incubation study. Geoderma, 269: 99-107.
    14. Johnson-Maynard, J.L., Graham, R.C., Wu, L., and Shouse, P.J. 2002. Modification of soil structural and hydraulic properties after 50 years of imposed chaparral and pine vegetation. Geoderma, 110: 227-240.
    15. Joseph, U.E., Toluwase, A.O., Kehinde, E.O., Omasan, E.E., Tolulope, A.Y., George, O.O., Zhao, C., and Hongyan, W. 2020. Effect of biochar on soil structure and storage of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the aggregate fractions of an Albic soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2: 66(1):1-2.
    16. Kemper, W.D., and Rosenau, R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Klute, A (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. pp: 425-442.
    17. Kladivko, E.J., Mackay, A.D., and Bradford, J.M. 1986. Earthworms as a factor in the reduction of soil crusting. Soil Science Society American Journal, 50: 191-196.
    18. Klute, A., and Dirksen, C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In Klute, A. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Agron. Monog.9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. pp: 687-734
    19. Knight, D., Elliott, P.W., Anderson, J.M., and Scholefield, D. 1992. The role of earthworms in managed, permanent pastures in Devon. Engl. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24: 1511-1517.
    20. Laird, D.A. 2008. The charcoal vision: a win–win–win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal, 100: 178-181.
    21. Lang, B., and Russell, D. J. 2019. Effects of earthworms on bulk density–a meta‐European Journal of Soil Science, 1-4.
    22. Larink, O., Werner, D., Langmaack, M., and Schrader, S. 2001. Regeneration of compacted soil aggregates by earthworm activity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 33: 395-401.
    23. Lehmann J., and Joseph, S. 2009. Biochar for environmental management- an introduction. In J. Lehmann and Joseph, S (eds.), Biochar for environmental management: Science and Technology. London. pp: 1-11.
    24. Liu, M., Hu, F., Chen, X., Huang, Q., Jiao, J., Zhang, B., and Li, H. 2009. Organic amendments with reduced chemical fertilizer promote soil microbial development and nutrient availability in a subtropical paddy field: the influence of quantity, type and application time of organic amendments. Applid Soil Ecology, 42: 166-175.
    25. Nahidan, N., and Safari Sinejani, A.A. 2019. The Effect of Earthworm, Cow Manure and its Biochar on Some Soil Biological Properties. 50, 1095-1109. (In Persian with English abstract)
    26. Omondi, M.O., Xia, X., Nahayo, A., Liu, X., Korai, P.K., and Pan, G. 2016. Quantification of biochar effects on soil hydrological properties using meta-analysis of literature Geoderma, 274: 28-34.
    27. Pagliai, M., Guidi, G., Lamarca, M., Giachetti, M., and Lucamante, P. 1981. Effects of sewage sludges and composts on soil porosity and aggregation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 10: 556-561.
    28. Peng, X., Ye, L., Wang, C., Zhou, H., and Sun, B. 2011. Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage and Research. 112: 159-166.
    29. Pratiwi, E.P., and Shinogi, Y. 2016. Rice husk biochar application to paddy soil and its effects on soil physical properties, plant growth, and methane emission. Paddy Water Environment, 14: 521-532.
    30. Rogovska, N., Laird, D.A., Rathke, S.J., and Karlen, D.L. 2014. Biochar impact on midwestern mollisols and maize nutrient availability. Geoderma, 230-231: 340-347.
    31. Safadoust, A., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Mahboubi, A.A., Nouroozi, A., and Asadian, Gh. 2007. Short-Term Tillage and Manure Influences on Soil Structural Properties. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 11 (41): 91-101. (In Persian with English abstract)
    32. Safadoust, A., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Mahboubi, A.A., and Yousefi, G. 2012. Effects of wetting/drying, freezing/thawing and earthworm activities on soil hydraulic properties. Journal of Water and Soil, 26: 340-34. (In Persian with English abstract)
    33. Safari Sinegani, A.A. 2015. Soil organic matter. Bu-Ali Sina University Pubilcation Center, Hamadan, Iran, 364p. (In persian)
    34. Schouten, S., Van Groenigen, J.W., Oenema, O., and Cayuela, M.L. 2012. Bioenergy from cattle manure Implications of anaerobic digestion and subsequent pyrolysis for carbon and nitrogen dynamics in soil. GCB Bioenergy, 4: 751-760.
    35. Song, W., and Guo, M. 2012. Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of analytical and applied pyrolysis, 94: 138-145.
    36. Tammeorg, P., Parviainen, T., Nuutinen, V., Simojoki, A., Vaara, E., and Helenius, J. 2014. Effects of biochar on earthworms in arable soil: avoidance test and field trial in boreal loamy sand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 191: 150-157.
    37. Usowicz, B., Lipiec, J., Lukowski, M., Marczewski, W., and Usowicz, J. 2016. The effect of biochar application on thermal properties and albedo of loess soil under grassland and fallow. Soil Tillage and Research, 164: 45-51.
    38. Uzoma, K.C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Zahoor, A., and Nishihara, E. 2011. Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 9: 1137–1143.
    39. Wen, B., Hu, X.Y., Liu, Y., Wang, W.S., Feng, M.H., and Shan, X.Q. 2004. The role of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) in influencing bioavailability of heavy metals in soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40(3), 181-187.
    40. Wong, J.T.F., Chen, Z., Wong, A.Y.Y., Wang Ng, C.W., and Wong, M.H. 2018. Effects of biochar on hydraulic conductivity of compacted kaolin clay. Environmental Pollution, 234: 468-472.
    41. Zhang, K., Chen, L., Li, Y., Brookes, P. C., Xu, J., and Luo, Y. 2017. The effects of combinations of biochar, lime, and organic fertilizer on nitrification and nitrifiers. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 53(1): 77-87.
    42. Zolfi Bavariani, M., Ronaghi, A., Karimian, N., Ghasemi, R., and Yasrebi, J. 2016. Effect of poultry manure derived biochars at different temperatures on chemical properties of a calcareous soil. Journal of Water and Soil. 20 (75):73-86. (In Persian with English abstract)

     

Agricultural Engineering
Volume 43, Issue 3
December 2020
Pages 365-387
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics