نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

3 استادیار، مرکز آموزش عالی شهید باکری میاندوآب، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

مطالعه و برنامه‌ریزی برای افزایش تولید در واحد سطح برای محصولات استراتژیک ضروری است که در این راستا ارزیابی تناسب محیطی از گام­های اصلی می‌باشد. مطالعه حاضر جهت ارزیابی تناسب کشت چغندرقند در منطقه خداآفرین استان آذربایجان­شرقی با استفاده از مدل‌های سامانه میکرولیز و طی بررسی عوامل محیطی 11 واحد اراضی انجام شد تا ضمن ارزیابی تناسب منطقه برای تیپ بهره­وری مذکور قابلیت استفاده از مدل­های سیستم میکرولیز نیز مورد بررسی قرار گیرد. براساس مدل ترازا، کاهش 20 تا 40 درصد تولید چغندرقند در اثر اختلال اقلیمی قابل پیش­بینی است. نتایج حاصل از مدل سرواتانا نشان داد که محدودیت­های متنوعی از زمین­نما منجر به کاهش کلاس اراضی از تناسب متوسط تا شرایط نامناسب شده که بحرانی­ترین عامل محدودیت عمق خاک است. براساس مدل آلماگرا کلاس‌بندی تناسب اراضی منطقه برای چغندرقند به­صورت کلاس­های S2 تا S5 بود که شایع­ترین مشکل محدودیت بافت و محدود کننده­ترین مورد عامل عمق خاک در برخی واحدها است. براساس نتایج مستخرج از مدل­ها حدود 98/82 درصد از اراضی دارای توجیه برای کشت چغندرقند می­باشد و کشت در 62/7 درصد اراضی همراه با افزایش هزینه­ها بوده و در مابقی اراضی وضعیت کاملاً نامناسب است. اصلاح اراضی در بخش کوچکی منجر به بهبود کلاس شده و با توجه به محدودیت­های موجود عمدتاً تغییر زیرکلاس­ها را در پی خواهد داشت. با توجه به تعریف اراضی و نیز جهت کاهش هزینه­های ارزیابی، استفاده سلسله مراتبی از مدل­های مورد بحث توصیه و کالیبره بودن مدل­های مذکور با توجه به محدوده مقادیر خصوصیات مورد بررسی برای استفاده در این منطقه تأیید می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing environmental suitability of Khodaafarin region for sugar beet utilization type using Micro LEIS decision system

نویسندگان [English]

  • Omid Ahmadi 1
  • Parisa Alamdari 2
  • Moslem Servati Khajeh 3
  • Hossein Rezaei 4

1 Ph.D. Student, Soil Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Soil Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Shahid Bakeri High Education Center of Miandoab, Urmia University- Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Soil Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz- Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction planning is essential for increasing production per unit area of strategic agricultural products. In this regard, land suitability evaluation is one of the most important key steps. While the FAO framework for land suitability evaluation is the most commonly used method, to overcome problems related to vagueness in definition and other uncertainties, methods such as Micro LEIS system models can be useful. Terraza, Cervatana and Almagra are the models of Micro LEIS package that are used to evaluate land suitability for agricultural activity. Considering the limitations in water resources required to produce this strategic product, the present research focuses on evaluation of Khodaafarin region lands suitability by Micro LEIS models for this utilization type.
Materials and Methods This research was carried out in an area of about 16555 ha in Khodaafarin, an important region in agricultural production, located in East Azerbaijan province, northwest of Iran. The major geological formation is composed of Quaternary sediments with sandstone. According to climatic data from Khomarlo synoptic weather forecasting data station, the average annual precipitation and temperature of the region are 281 mm and 14.7 °C, respectively, and the soil moisture and temperature regimes are Aridic border to Xeric and Thermic. The study area was divided to 11 land units by geopedology method. In each land unit, a soil profile was dug, described and sampled for physico-chemical analysis. After preparing soil samples in the laboratory, soil physico-chemical routine analyses, which are important in soil classification and evaluation, were completed by standard methods, and then studied soils were classified by the 12th edition of soil taxonomy. To conduct land suitability investigations, three models of Micro LEIS package including Terraza (to determine bioclimatic deficiency), Cervatana (to determine land capability) and Almagra (to determine the suitability evaluation of the studied area) were used. Finally, according to adopted models, land capability and suitability class and sub-class were determined in actual and potential condition for sugar beet, and their maps were prepared by Arc Map 10.2.
Results and Discussion According to the results obtained from description of soil profiles and physical and chemical analyses, soils can be classified as a different family of Aridisols and Entisols on the basis of USDA soil taxonomy system. Based on the Terraza model, bioclimatic deficiency class for the studied utilization type is C3 (h2-f3) or h2 moisture deficit and f3 frost risk classes, whose combination leads to C3 final class. This class revealed that during the growth period, 2-5 months annually the temperature goes under biological zero and production would decrease by 20 to 40%. Therefore, it is recommended to have safe irrigation and frost risk management. The results of Cervatana model indicated that for slope, climate, erosion and soil limitations with various degrees, 77.01% of the study area was placed in S2 land capability class. Also, 18.16% and 4.83% were classified as S3 and N1 classes, respectively. Among the above-mentioned factors, soil depth limitation was identified as the most restrictive and climate as the mildest one all over the study area. According to S2 class suggested by the Almagra model, 82.98% of the study area is acceptable for this utilization type. Suitability class for 7.62% of the study area is S3, which would increase the costs. Also, 9.4% of the study area is never suitable for sugar beet due to intensive limitation of soil useful depth and texture, which leads to S5 class. The nature of the limiting factors in land units suggests that they might be resolved. Based on this fact, in 19.64% of study area suitability class can shift to the upper one due to land improvement, while in 22.99% of the study area it is impossible for such a shift. In other parts, although some of the limitations can be solved, land suitability class remains stable and only their sub-class changes.
Conclusion Considering land evaluation and the  nature and professional use of Micro LEIS system models, Terrraza, Cervatana and Almagra models should be used hierarchically. Hierarchical use of models can help reduce costs because it is designed as a multiple-stage approach of land evaluation that assesses various biophysical properties of lands step by step. Accommodation of the values related to the studied land properties within the specified range presented in the models indicates that these models are calibrated for evaluating this utilization type in north-west of Iran. Therefore, traditional evaluation systems can be replaced by Micro LEIS system. According to the obtained actual and potential suitability class for sugar beet, it seems that it is a reasonable utilization type in the study area. Land improvement does not have a significant effect on the rise of land suitability class and profitability; nevertheless, it is recommended to have pilot land improvement programs to find factors which might have been ignored and might bring about further limitations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Almagra
  • Land evaluation
  • Land improvement
  • Land suitability
  • Terraza
  • Cervatana
  1. References

    1. O., Alamdari, P., Servati, M., and Khoshzaman, T. 2018. Determination of the priority of cultivation for some types of garden utilization for construction of orchard in the Khodaafarin Area. Applied Soil Research. (In Persian)
    2. Anonymous, 2005. Geological Map of Khodaafarin 1: 100000, Series 5367. Ministry of Industries and Mines of Iran, Tehran.
    3. Anonymous, Laboratory Analysis Instructions of Water and Soil Samples. No. 467. Soil and Water Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran. (In Persian)
    4. Anonymous, 2017. Country Climate Analysis. In: Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization, Khomarlu Synoptic Station. Data sheet.
    5. Ayalew, G., and Selassie, Y.G. 2015. Evaluation of land suitability for cash and perennial cops using geographical information system in east Amhara region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 4: 1-7.
    6. Ayoubi, S., and Jalalian, A. 2010. Land Evaluation (Agriculture and natural resources). University of Isfahan, second edition, 385 pp. (In Persian)
    7. Banaei, M.H. 1998. Soil Moisture and Temperature Regime Map of Iran. Soil and Water Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran.
    8. Basati, J., Kolivand, M., Nemati, A., and Zarei, A. 2002. Study of autumn sowing of sugar beet in the tropical areas of Kermanshah province. Sugar beet of journal, 18(2): 119-130. (In Persian)
    9. De la Rosa, D., and Magaldi, D. 1982. Rasgos methdologie de un Sistema de evaluacion tierras para regions mediterraneas. Soc, Esp, Cien, Suelo, Madrid, (In Spanish).
    10. De la Rosa, D., Mayol, F., Diaz-Pereira, E., Fernandez, M., and De la Rosa, DJr. 2004. A land Evaluation Decision Support System (MicroLEIS DSS) for agricultural soil protection. Environmental Modeling and Software, 19: 929-942.
    11. De la Rosa, D., Moreno, J.A., Garcia, L.V., and Almorza, J. 1992. MicroLEIS: A microcomputer-based Mediterranean Land Evaluation System. Soil Use and Management, 8: 89-96.
    12. Delsouz Khaki, B., Honarjoo, N., Davatgar, N., Jalalian, A., and Torabi Golsefidi, H. 2018. Land suitability evaluation and inherent soil fertility quality for rice cultivation in paddy fields of Shaft and Fouman counties. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 32(1): 115-128. (In Persian with English abstract)
    13. Etedali, S., and Givi, G. 2013. Qualitative land suitability evaluation for Maize in Shahrekord area using FAO method and ALES program. Journal of Water and Soil, 26 (6): 1349-1359. (In Persian with English abstract)
    14. Farshi, A.A., Shariati, M.R., Jarollahi, R., Ghasemi, M.R., Shahabifar, M., and Tolayi, M. 1997. Water Requirement Estimating of Main Crops. Soil and Water Research Institute Press, Karaj, Iran, 650p. (In Persian)

     

    1. Garcia, J.L., De la Rosa, D., and Bojorquez, J.I. 2006. Relative agricultural aptitude of the Tuxpan municipality, Nayarit, using Almagra model of the MicroLEIS system. Investigating of the geography, Bulletin the Institute of Geography, UNAM, 59: 59-73.
    2. Givi, J. 1997. Qualitative Assessment of Land Suitability for Crops. Soil and Water Research Institute. Technical Journal 1015. (In Persian)
    3. Givi, J. 1998. Qualitative and Economic Evaluation of Proportion and Determination of Land Production Potential for Major Crops in Falavarjan Isfahan. Research project of Institute of Planning and Economic Research of Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran. (In Persian)
    4. Jafarzadeh, A.A., and Shahbazi, F. 2010. Suitability of peach in Souma area (Iran), using Almagra model. Proceeding of 19th World Congress of Soil Science; Oct 29-31; Brisbane, Australia, pp: 143-146.
    5. Khidir, S.M. 1986. A Statistical Approach in the Use of Parametric Systems Applied to the FAO Framework for Land Evaluation. PhD Thesis of State University, Ghent, Belgium.
    6. Kutter, A., Nachtergaele, F.O., and Verheye, W.H. 1997. The new FAO approach to land use planning and management, and its application in Sierra Leone. ITC Journal, 3: 278-283.
    7. Mohammadi, J. 2007. Pedometry: Fuzzy Systems Theory. Pelk Publications Press, Tehran. (In Persian)
    8. Moravej, K., Alamdari, P., Delavar, M.A., and Fathi, M. 2017. Site detection for planting of chosen agricultural and horticultural plants in Abyek region, Qazvin province. Water and Soil Science, 27(3): 93-105. (In Persian with English abstract)
    9. Niknam, P., Shahbazi, F., Oustan, S.H., and Sokouti, R. 2018. Using MicroLEIS DSS to assess the impact of climate change on land capability in the miandoab plain, Iran. Carpathian journal of earth and environmental sciences, 13(1): 225–234.
    10. Rezaei, H., Shahbazi, F., Jafarzadeh, A.A., and Alavikia, S.S. 2011. Statistical analysis of results of parametric methods and Almagra model in land evaluation. Water and Soil Science Tabriz, 21(4): 66–80. (In Persian with English abstract)
    11. Schoeneberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. 2006. Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE. 580p.
    12. Servati, M., Momtaz, H.R., Omrani, M., and Mohammadi, H. 2014. Land suitability of Golfaraj region for Sugarbeet cultivation using Mediterranean system. Applied Soil Research, 2(2): 1-11. (In Persian with English abstract)
    13. Shahbazi, F., De la Rosa, D., Anaya-Romero, M., Jafarzadeh, A.A., Sarmadian, F., Neyshabouri, M.R., and Oustan, S.H. 2008. Land use planning in Ahar area (Iran) using MicroLEIS DSS. International Agrophysics, 22: 277-286.
    14. Sharifi, P., Servati, M., and Mohammadkhani, N. 2017. Climate change impact on land suitability evaluation for some rainfed crops in Miandoab region. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 32(2): 243-254. (In Persian with English abstract)
    15. Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to Soil Taxonomy (12th ). NRCS, USDA, USA.
    16. Storie, R.E. 1950. Rating soils for agricultural forest and grazing use. Trans Fourth International Congress Soil Science, (1): 336-339.
    17. Sys, C., Van Ranset, E., and Debaveye, J. 1991a. Land Evaluation. Part I, Principle in Land Evaluation and Crop Production Calculation. International Training Center for Post Graduate Soil Scientists, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
    18. Sys, C., Van Ranset, E., and Debaveye, J. 1991b. Land Evaluation, Part II, Methods in Land Evaluation. International Training Center for Post Graduate Soil Scientists, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
    19. Sys, C., Van Ranset, E., Debaveye, J., and Beernaert, F. 1993. Land Evaluation, Part III, Crop Requirements. General Administration for Development Cooperation Place, Brussels, Belgium.
    20. Wahba, M.M., Darwish, K.M., and Awad, F. 2007. Suitability of specific crops using MicroLEIS program in Sahal Baraka, Farfara Oasis, Egypt. Journal of Applied Science Research, 3(7): 531-539.
    21. Zheng, Y.G., Lu, H.J., and He, F.G. 1989. A methodology for land suitability evaluation. Land Research, 2: 31-37.