مهندسی زراعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

ارزیابی تاثیر سه ماده‌ی بهساز بر قابلیت کربن اندوزی و دیگر ویژگی‌های خاک و اندام های مختلف گندم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری پیدایش، رده‌بندی و ارزیابی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

چکیده

این تحقیق به منظور ارزیابی تاثیر سه ماده بهساز بقایای یونجه، کاه و کلش گندم و کود مرغی بر مقدار کربن­اندوزی و مقدار کربن اندام گیاهی و خاک و برخی ویژگی‌های خاک در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با 11 تیمار ( 2، 4 و 6 تن در هکتار کود مرغی، 5، 10 و 15 تن در هکتار بقایای یونجه، 10 و 15 تن در هکتار کاه و کلش گندم، 100 درصد نیاز کودی و شاهد) و سه تکرار و در مجموع 33 نمونه، در مزرعه­ای واقع در دشت ارمو، شهرستان دره شهر در استان ایلام اجرا شد. نتایج نشان داد مقدار کربن­اندوزی و مقدار کربن در اندام هوایی گیاه نسبت به ریشه بیشتر بود. بیشترین مقدار کربن­اندوزی و مقدار کربن در گیاه و بیشترین مقدار فسفر خاک در تیمار 6 تن در هکتار کود مرغی و بیشترین مقدار کربن­اندوزی و مقدار کربن خاک در تیمار 15 تن در هکتار کاه و کلش گندم مشاهده شد. مقدار نیتروژن و پتاسیم در خاک به ترتیب 47 و 64 درصد نسبت به شاهد افزایش نشان داد. با افزودن مواد بهساز به خاک، مقادیر pH و EC کاهش یافت و بیشترین مقدار در تیمار شاهد و کمترین در تیمار 15 تن در هکتار کاه و کلش گندم مشاهده شد که به ترتیب 4/4 و 8/50 درصد نسبت به شاهد کاهش داشتند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر بیانگر این است که مقدار کربن­اندوزی در خاک نسبت به گیاه بیشتر بوده و خاک مهمترین مخزن کربن محسوب می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the effect of three amendment materials on total soil organic carbon potential and other soil characteristics and wheat different organ

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Zeinvand 1
  • Afsaneh Alinejadian 2
  • Mohammad Feizian 3
  • Omidali َAkbarpour 4

1 Ph.D. Student, Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Lorestan University, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Soil Science Department, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Soil Science Department, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.

4 Assistant Prof., Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural resources, Lorestan University, Iran.

چکیده [English]

IntroductionDue to the use of fossil fuels, land use changes, and deforestation, it increases atmospheric carbon dioxide, which affects greenhouse gas emissions, results in global warming, effectively. Since crop production directly depends on climate, agriculture is one of the first sectors affected by climate change. Increasing greenhouse gas emissions leads to warming up and warming has devastating effects on organisms life, damaging natural ecosystems, causing floods, droughts, and disrupting the climate and ecological balance. Total soil organic carbon is the ability of trees and other plants to absorb carbon dioxide from theatmosphere and store it as carbon in wood, roots, leaves, and soil.Total soil organic carbon of plant biomass and Total soil organic carbon under this biomass is the simplest and most economically feasible solution to reduce atmospheric CO2. In this regard, an experiment was carried to investigate the effect of three amendment materials (alfalfa residues, straw and wheat straw, and poultry manure) on some soil characteristics, soil and wheat organ Total soil organic carbon potential.
Materials and MethodsTo investigate the possibility ofimproving soil carbon sequestration, carbon content of plant and soil and some soil characteristics, an experiment was design in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in the crop year 2018-2019, in a farm in Dasht-e Aramou, Dare Shahr-Ilam province, in three replications on the wheat plant. Trial factors include two factors, the types and amount of amendment materials (alfalfa residues at 5, 10 and 15 t/ha, straw and wheat straw at 5, 10 and 15 t/ha, poultry manure at three levels of 2, 4 and 6 t/ha and chemical fertilizer is 100 percent fertilizer requirement). The studied traits included root carbon, shoot carbon, root total organic carbon, and shoot total organic carbon, total organic carbon, soil organic carbon percentage, total soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, soil phosphorus, soil potassium, soil pH and soil Electrical Conductivity (EC).
Results and DiscussionThe use of amendment materials had a positive effect on most of the studied traits compared with the lack of application of amendment materials. The results showed that the amount of Total soil organic carbon and the percentage of carbon in shoots were higher than roots. The highest total organic carbon, percentage of carbon in plant and soil phosphorus were observed in 6 t/ha poultry manure (M6) while the highestTotal soil organic carbon and soil carbon content was obtained in 15 t/ha straw and wheat straw (G15). Also, the highest amount of soil nitrogen and potassium was obtained in 15 t/ha (Y15) alfalfa residues and the lowest amount in control treatment which were 47and 64 percent higher than the control, respectively. Contrary to all measured traits, pH and EC values were decreased by adding soil amendment materials. The highest was obtained in control treatment and lowest was observed in 15 t/ha (G15) straw and wheat straw which was 4.4 percent and 50.8 percent lower than the control, respectively.
Conclusion Gradual degradation of organic matter increases the efficiency of nutrients, the effect of these compounds on the plant's yield and soil properties for several years. The use of high quality plant residues, if combined with optimized management, will have a good result, especially if the timing of the release of nutrients from decomposing plant debris coincides with the need for the crop. Under such conditions, the time gap between the release of elements from plant residues and absorption of elements by the plant will be reduced and by reducing nutrition elements, it will increase absorption efficiency. In general, the effect of fertilizer type and plant residue on the amount of carbon of the plant and soil as well as the amount of nutrients in the soil was significant at 1% level. Among the different treatments, 6 ton/ha of poultry manure had the most effect on total soil organic carbon and carbon storage in plant organs, and treatment of 15 ton/ha wheat straw had the most effect on total soil organic carbon and carbon storage in soil. Alfalfa residue treatment had the most effect on soil phosphorus and potassium content and poultry manure had the most effect on soil nitrogen. Regarding to the lower price of plant residue, it is more appropriate than poultry. Due to availability of poultrymanure in the most parts of the country, it recommends more than other fertilizers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Carbon sequestration
  • Wheat
  • Amendment materials
  • Soil nitrogen
  • Electrical conductivity
مراجع

  1. References

    1. Abdi, N., Maadah Arefi, H., and Zahedi Amiri, G.H. 2008. Estimation of Carbon Sequestration in Astragalus Rangelands of Markazi Province (Case Study: Malmir Rangeland in Shazand Region). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 15(2): 269-282. (In Persian).
    2. Agyenim-Boateng, S., Zickerman, J., and Kornahrens, M. 2006. Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of Maize. West African Journal of Applied Ecology, 9:61–70.
    3. Ahmad Abadi, Z. and Ghajar Sepanlou, M. Effect of organic matter application on some of the soil physical properties. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 19(2): 99-116.

    4.     Alijani, Kh., Bahrani, M.J., and Kazemeini, S.A. 2011. Effects of Tillage Methods and Rates of Corn Residues on Wheat Growth, Yield and Yield Components. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(3): 486-493. (In Persian).

    1. Allison, L.E., 1975. Organic carbon. In: Black, C.A., Evans, D.D., White, J.L., Ensminger, L.E., Clark, F.E. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p. 1367.
    2. All-Issa, T.A. and Samarah, N.H. 2007. The effect of tillage practices on barley production under rainfed conditions in Jordan. Am- Eurasian. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 2(1): 75-79.
    3. Aradottir, A., Savarsottri, L., Kristin, H., Jonsson, P., and Gudbergsson, G. 2000. Carbon accumulation in vegetation and soils by reclamation of degraded areas. Icelandic Agricultural Sciences, 13: 99-113.
    4. Batjes, N.H. 1998. Mitigation of atmospheric CO2 concentrations by increased carbon sequestration in the soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 230-235.
    5. Blanco-Canqui, H. and Lal, R. 2009. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28: 139–163.
    6. Bolinder, M.A., Janzen, H.H., Gregorich, E.G., Angers, D.A., and VandenBygaart, A.J. 2007. An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 118(4):29-42.
    7. Celik, I., Ortas, I., and Kilic, S. 2004. Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 78: 59-67.
    8. Clark, G.J., Dodgshun, N., Saleh, P.W.G., and Tang, C. 2007. Changes in chemical and biological properties of a soil clay subsoil with addition of organic amendments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39: 2806-2817.
    9. Conen, F. and Smith, K.A. 1998. A re-examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emission from soils to the atmosphere. European Journal of Soil Science, 49:701-707.
    10. Daudu, C.K., Muchaonyerwa, P., and Mnkeni, P.N.S. 2009. Litterbag decomposition of genetically modified maize residues and their constituent Bacillus thuringiensis protein (Cry1Ab) under field conditions in the central region of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 134:153– 158.
    11. Dayegamiye, A.N. and Tran, T.S. 2001. Effects of green manures on soil organic matter and wheat yields and N nutrition. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 81: 371-382.
    12. Derner, J.D. and Schuman, G.E. 2007. Carbon sequestration and rangelands: A synthesis of land management and precipitation effects. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 6(2): 77-85.
    13. Dinakarm, J. and Krishnayya, N.S.R. 2008. Variation in type of vegetal cover and heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in affecting sink capacity of tropical soils. Current Science, 94 (9): 1144-1150.
    14. Essien O.E. 2011. Effect of varying rates of organic amendments on porosity and infiltration rate of sandy loam soil. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12: 51- 58.
    15. Fabrizzi, K.P., Rice, C.W., Schlegel, A., Peterson, D., Sweeney, D.W., and Thompson, C. 2007. Soil carbon sequestration in kansas: long-term effect of tillage, n fertilization, and crop Rotation. Kansas State University, 1-44.
    16. Fageria, N.K. and Baligar, V.C. 2005. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advance in Agronomy, 88: 97-
    17. Falahatkar, S., Hosseini, S.M., Ayoubi, Sh., and Salman Mahiny, A. 2013. The impact of primary terrain attributes and land cover/use on soil organic carbon density in a region of Northern Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 27(5): 963-972 (In Persian).
    18. Fan, Z., Chai, Q., Huang, G., Yu, A., Huang, P., Yang, C., Tao, Z., and Liu, H. 2013. Yield underwater consumption characteristics of wheat/maize intercropping whit reduced tillage in an oasis region. European Journal of Agronomy, 45:52-58.
    19. Forozeh, M., Heshmati, Gh., Ghadirian, Gh. and Mesbah, S.H. 2008. Comparing Carbon Sequestration Potential of Three Shrub Species Heliantemum lippii, Dendrostellera lessertii and Artemisia sieberi (Case study: Gareh Bygone, Fasa). Journal of Environmental Studies, 34(46): 65-72.
    20. Gao, Y.H., Luo, P., Wu, N., Chen, H. and Wang, G.X. 2007. Grazing intensity impacts on carbon sequestration in an alpine meadow on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 6: 642-647.
    21. Ghaffari Nejad, A. 2017. Response of greenhouse cucumber to different levels and sources of organic manures and their effects on some soil properties. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture Soilless Culture Research Center, 8 (2) :67-80
    22. Ghasemi aghbash, F., heydarian, Sh., and Solgi, I. 2018. The amount of carbon sequestration capability of tree cover and roadside soil (Case study: Khorramabad-Andimeshk Highway). Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation, 5(11): 115-129. (In Persian).
    23. Haefele, S.M., Konboon, Y., Wongboon, W., Amarante, S., Maarifat, A.A., Pfeiffer, E.M. and Knoblauch, C. 2011. Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based Field Crops Research, 121 (3): 430-440.
    24. Jafarian, Z. and Tayefeh Seyyed Alikhani, L. 2016. Carbon Sequestration Potential in Dry Farmed wheat in Kiasar Region. Agricultural science and sustainable production, 23 (1): 31-41. (In Persian).
    25. Körner, C. 2003. Ecological impacts of atmospheric CO2 enrich-ment on terrestrial ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361: 2023–2041.
    26. Kumar, K. and Goh, K.M. 2000. Crop residues and management practices: effects on soil quality, soil nitrogen dynamics. Crop yield, and nitrogen recovery. Advances of Agronomy, 68: 197-319.
    27. Li, H., Wang, S., Guo, M., Gao, H., Pang, H., and Li, Y. 2012. Effect of different straw layer on soil water-salt movement and maize yield in Hetao Irrigation District in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 31: 91-94.(in Chinese).
    28. Mahmoodabadi, M., Rashidi, O.L., and Fekri, M. 2013. Application of Alfalfa Residue, Poultry Manure and Potassium Fertilizer on some Soil Properties and Onion Yield. Journal of Water and Soil, 27(2): 452-461. (In Persian).

    33.      Mahmoudi Taleghani, E., Zahedi Amiri, G., Adeli, E., and Sagheb-Talebi, Kh. 2007. Assessment of carbon sequestration in soil layers of managed forest. Iranian Journal of Forest an Poplar Research, 15(3): 241-252.(In Persian). (In Persian).

    1. Maiksteniene, S. and Arlauskiene A. 2004. Effect of preceding crops and green manure on the fertility of clay loam Agronomy Research, 2(1): 87-97.
    2. Mirzaei, R., Kambozia, J., Sabahi, H., and Mahdavi, A. 2009 properties, production and biomass yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum ). Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 15(1): 257-268.
    3. Mohr, R., Entz, M., and Bulilied, W. 1999. Plant available nitrogen supply as affected by method and timing of alfalfa termination. Agronomy Journal, 91:622-
    4. Mandokhail, G. M., marri, A., and Sami, A. 2018. Chemical Analysis of Reinforced Stabilized Soil. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11(32): 1-8.
    5. Nobakht, A., Pourmajidian, M.R., Hojjati, S.M., and Fallah, A. 2011. A comparison of soil carbon sequestration in hardwood and softwood monocultures (Case study: Dehmian forest management plan, Mazindaran). Iranian Journal of Forest, 13(1): 13-23. (In Persian).
    6. Nosrati, K. 2011. The effect of land use and soil erosion on soil organic carbon and nitrogen stock. Research on environmental erosions, 3: 128-140. (In Persian)
    7. Razavi Nasab, A. Fotovat, A., Astaraie;R and Tajabadipour, A. 2019. Effect of organic and chemical amendments on some nutrients concentration of soil and pistachio leaf at field condition. Journal of Crop Engineering, 42(1): 47-59. (In Persian).
    8. Rice, C.W., Fabrizzi, K. and White, P. 2007. Benefits of soil organic carbon to physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. In: Kimble, J.M., Rice, C.W., Reed, D. Mooney, S., Follett, R.F. and Lal, R. (eds). Soil carbon management, economic, environmental and societal benefits”. CRC Press, USA, 155-162.
    9. Richard, A.E., Dalal, R.C. and Schmidt, S. 2007. Soil carbon turnover and sequestration in native subtropical tree plantations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39: 2078–2090.
    10. Roldan, A., Caravaca, F., Hernandez, M. T., Garcia, C., Sanchez-Brito, C., Velasquez, M. and Tiscareno, M. 2003. No-tillage, crop residue additions, and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed (Mexico). Soil and Tillage Research, 72: 65–73.
    11. Russell, A.E., Laird, D.A., Parkin, T.B. and Mallarino, A.P. 2005. Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cropping System on Carbon Sequestration in Midwestern Mollisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(2): 413-422.
    12. Salinger, M.J. 2005. Climate variability and change: past, present and future-an overview. Climate Change, 70: 9-29.
    13. Sheikh Hosseini, A. and Nurbkhsh, F. 2007. The Effect of soil and plant residues on net nitrogen mineralization. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 75: 127-133. (In Persian).
    14. Singh, H.P. and Diwivedi, V.K. 2003. Character association and path analysis in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). Agricultural Science Digestive, 22: 225- 547.
    15. Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Andren, O., Karlsson, T., Perala, P., Regina, K., Rounsevell, M., and Wesemael, B. 2005. Carbon sequestrationpotential in European croplands has been overestimated. Global Change Biology, 11: 2153-2163.
    16. Taiwo, A.A., Adetunji, M.T., Azeez, J.O., and Elemo, K.O. 2006. Kinetics of potassium release and fixation in some soils of Ogun State, Southwestern, Nigeria as influenced by organic manure. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 7:251–259.
    17. Varamesh, S., Hosseini, S. M, Abdi, N., and Akbarinia, M. 2009. Effect of afforestation to increase carbon sequestration and improving soil characteristics. Journal of the forest, 35: 1-25.
    18. Walker, D.J. and Bernal, M.P. 2008. The Effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry manure on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil. Bioresource Technology, 99: 396-403
    19. Wang, K.L.H., Wang, K.R.J., and Buresh, R.J. 2007. Residue management for improving soil fertility and sustainable crop productivity in China. Proceeding International Rice Conference. New Delhi, India. Pp: 689-
    20. Withers, P.J.A. and Bailey, G.A. 2003. Sediment and phosphorus transfer in overland flow from a maize field receiving manure. Soil use and management, 19(1): 28-35.
    21. Yong Zhong, S. 2007. Soil Carbon and nitrogen sequestration following the conversion of cropland to alfalfa land in northwest china. Journal of soil and Tillage Research, 92: 181-189.
    22. Zhang, G.S., Chan, K.Y., Oates, A., Heenan, D.P., and Huang, G.B. Relationship between soil structure and runoff/soil loss after 24 years of conservation tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 92: 122–128.
مهندسی زراعی
دوره 43، شماره 2
شهریور 1399
صفحه 163-182
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار