مهندسی زراعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اثر نوع کود نیتروژنی و شوری بر غلظت و الگوی جذب نیتروژن در گندم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیارپژوهش مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران.

2 مربی پژوهش مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان یزد، ایران.

چکیده

به منظور بررسی تاثیر شوری آب آبیاری و نوع کود نیتروژنی بر الگوی جذب نیتروژن توسط گندم، آزمایشی مزرعه‌ای در قالب کرت‌های یک بار خرد شده بر پایه طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه سطح شوری آب آبیاری 70/1، 22/7 و 12 دسی­زیمنس بر متر و دو نوع کود نیتروژنی ( اوره و سولفات آمونیوم) با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری واقع در شهرستان اشکذر از توابع استان یزد انجام شد. مقدار کود نیتروژنی مصرفی معادل 105 کیلوگرم در هکتار نیتروژن بود. در مراحل پنجه‌زنی، ساقه‌روی، گلدهی و برداشت وزن خشک و غلظت نیتروژن اندام هوایی اندازه­گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که غلظت نیتروژن در اندام هوایی گندم، در مراحل اولیه رشد حدود 5 درصد بود و با نزدیک شدن به مرحله برداشت به یک درصد کاهش یافت. مقدار برداشت نیتروژن از خاک بسته به مقدار کود نیتروژن مصرفی و شوری آب آبیاری از 81 تا 189 کیلوگرم در هکتار نیتروژن متغیر بود، اما نوع کود نیتروژنی تاثیر معنی‌داری بر مقدار آن نداشت. با افزایش سطح شوری و با کاهش میزان مصرف کود نیتروژنی، مقدار ماده خشک اندام هوایی و در نتیجه مقدار برداشت نیتروژن کاهش یافت. با توجه به این­که کمتر از 15 درصد از نیتروژن جذب شده از خاک در فاصله کاشت تا پنجه‌زنی اتفاق افتاد، بنابراین نتیجه‌گیری می‌شود که در شرایط مشابه این پژوهش، حداکثر میزان مصرف کودهای نیتروژنی تا زمان پنجه‌زنی معادل 15 درصد از کل کود مصرفی باشد. همچنین، بخش عمده کود نیتروژنی (85 درصد) از زمان اواسط پنجه‌زنی به بعد مصرف گردد.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of salinity and nitrogen fertilizer sources on nitrogen content and nitrogen uptake pattern in wheat plants

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Karimi 1
  • Mohammad Zaremehrjardi 2

1 National Salinity Research Center (NSRC), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO),Yazd, Iran, Po. Box. 8917357676

2 National Salinity Research Center (NSRC), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO),Yazd, Iran,

چکیده [English]

Introduction Annually around 2 million tons of nitrogenous fertilizers is used in Iran. It was reported that increasing trend of chemical fertilizers application over the last 30 years with some fluctuations. So, proper fertilizer management in Iran has great effect on soil and water quality. Salinity stress is known as a worldwide abiotic stress responsible for reduced crop production. It is estimated that annual losses of yield due to salt induced land degradation is US$ 27.3 billion globally. Social and economic dimensions of salinity stress can be employment losses as well as environmental degradation. In addition, it is well documented that application of chemical fertilizers usually improve plant performance under saline conditions but results in plant fertilizer requirement under salt affected soils are contrary. While there is little evidence of yield benefits due to application of fertilizers in salinized fields at rates beyond optimal in non-saline conditions, there is enough evidence indicating that soil salinity does not affect or decrease plant fertilizer needs. It is well documented that salinity stress negatively affects wheat growth rate and it postpone the ripening in wheat plants. While flowering happened at 59. 33 days after planting at non-saline conditions, it occurred 62.22 days after planting for salt affected plants. The negative effect of salinity on wheat nitrogen content is reported. This is due to the negative effect of salinity stress on root growth and the chloride on nitrogen uptake. A hypothesis that salinity stress can adversely affect nitrogen uptake pattern of wheat has been proposed, but, contradictory results have been reported. Thus nitrogen fertilizer management may need to be modified under arid and semiarid conditions of Yazd province with wide range of irrigation water qualities. Accordingly, the objectives of this field study were to elucidate the effect of salinity stress on nitrogen uptake pattern and nitrogen timing in wheat.
Materials and methods A field experiment was conducted on wheat at Sadooq Salinity Research Station, Ashkezar, Yazd, Iran. Mean annual temperature is 18°C and precipitation is 70 mm. The treatments, nitrogen fertilizer sources (ammonium sulphate and urea) and three irrigation water qualities (1.7, 7.22 and 12 dS m-1), arranged in a randomized block, split plot design with three replications. Consisting 20 rows of wheat, each field plot was 6*4 m. All plots received common agricultural practices including tillage and fertilizer application. Regarding typical recommendations and guidelines for this region and soil type, all fertilizers, except urea that applied in 2 splits, were soil-applied before planting. Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 105 kg ha-1 at two stages (90 and 120 days after planting). As soil phosphorous and potassium content was above threshold level, these elements were not applied for wheat production. Plant samples were provided at four growth stages including tillering, stem elongation, flowering and harvest. The samples were analyzed for nitrogen content. Plant nitrogen content was determined using kjldal method. The analysis of variance for different parameters was done following ANOVA technique. When F was significant at p ≤ 0.05 level, treatment means were separated using DMRT.
Results and discussion The soil at the experimental site was calcareous with 31.5% total nutrient value, sandy loam texture, high pH (8.06) and low organic carbon (0.51 %). The results showed that wheat top yield depends on irrigation water salinity level as well as nitrogen management. While a sigmoidal trend in wheat top yield for all treatments observed over time, increasing irrigation water salinity from 1.7 to 7.22 and 12 dS m-1 decreased wheat yield at harvest from 11058 to 7183 and 7933 kg ha-1. In other words, salinity stress significantly decreased wheat performance by 35.04 and 28.26 percent. The results also showed that nitrogen content decreased over time. While nitrogen content was more than 5 percent at tillering it decreased to 1 percent at harvest. Nitrogen uptake was not affected by nitrogen source but it was affected negatively by irrigation water salinity. Depending on salinity levels and the application rate of nitrogen, nitrogen uptake by wheat ranged from 81 to 189 kg ha-1. However, nitrogen uptake was not affected significantly by nitrogen sources.
Conclusion Overall, it was concluded that salinity stress did not affect nitrogen uptake pattern of wheat under field conditions of the experiment. As more than 80 percent of nitrogen was uptaken from mid tillering onward, it is recommended that just only 15 percent of nitrogen fertilizer be applied at planting. This would increase nitrogen uptake efficiency and prevent soil, water and air pollution.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ammonium sulphat
  • Nitrogen concentration
  • Urea
مراجع

  1. References

    1. Abdul‐Kadir, S.M., and Paulsen, G.M. 1982. Effect of salinity on nitrogen metabolism in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 5: 1141-1151.
    2. Abbas, Z.K., and Mobin, M. 2016. Comparative growth and physiological responses of two wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars differing in salt tolerance to salinity and cyclic drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62(6): 745–758.
    3. Akhtari, A., Homaee, M., and Hoseini, Y. 2014. Modeling plant response to salinity and soil nitrogen deficiency. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation, 3: 33-50.
    4. AminiSefidab A., Vahabzadeh, M. , MajidiHeravan, E., Akbari, A., Afyoni, D., Saberi, M.H., Tabatabaee, M.T., HajiakhondiMeybodi, H., Koohkan, S A., and Lotfali Ayeneh, G.A. 2012. Arg, A New Bread Wheat Cultivar for Moderate Climate Zones of Iran with Salinity of Soil and Water. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 28(1): 723-726. (in Persian).
    5. Ataurrahman, M., Sarker, M.A.Z., Amin, M.F., Jajam, A.H.S., and Akhter, M.M. 2011. Yield response and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat under different doses and split application of nitrogen fertilizer. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 36(2): 231-240.
    6. Ayers, R.S. and Westcot, D.W., 1985. Water quality for agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization,
    7. Balali, M., Mohajeremilani, P., Khademi, Z., Doroodi, M.S., Mashayekhi, H.H., and Malakooti, M.J., 2000. A comperehensive computer model for fertilizer recommendation towards sustainable agriculture. Ammozeshe Keshavarzi Press, 63. (in Persian).
    8. Banaei, M.H., Moameni, A., Bybordi, M., and Malakouti, M.J. 2005. The soils of Iran. Sana press, 481. (in Persian).
    9. Behbahanizadah, A.A. and Ehyaee, M. 1993. Methods of soil analysis. Soil and Water Research Institute paper No. 893, Soil and Water Research Institute, 76. (in Persian).
    10. Blandino, M., Patrizia, V., and Amedeo R. 2015. Late-season nitrogen increases improve common and durum wheat quality. Agronomy Journal, 107(2): 680- 690.
    11. Bernstein, L., Francois, L.E., and Clark, R.A. 1974. Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables. Agronomy journal, 66: 412-421.
    12. Bouyoucos, C.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle-size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal, 54: 406-465.
    13. Butcher, K., Wick, A.F., Desutter, T., Chatterjee, A., and Harmon, J. 2016. Soil Salinity: A Threat to Global Food Security. Agronomy Journal, 108: 2189-2200.
    14. Chakraborty, K., Sairama, R.K., and Bhaduri, D. 2016. Effects of different levels of soil salinity on yield attributes, accumulation of nitrogen, and micronutrients in Brassica spp. Journal of plant Nutrition, 39 (7): 1026–1037.
    15. Efretuei, A., Gooding, M., White, E., Spink, J., and Hackett, R. 2016. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application timing on nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield of winter wheat in Ireland. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 55(1): 63-73.
    16. EL-Sharkawy, M.S., EL-Beshbeshy, T.R, Hassan, S.M, Mahmoud, E.K., Abdelkader, N.I., Al-Shal, R.M., and Missaoui, A. 2017. Alleviating salt stress in barley by use of plant growth stimulants and potassium sulfate. Journal of Agricultural Science, 9 (4):136-154.
    17. Endris, S., and Mohammad, MJ. 2007. Nutrient acquisition and yield response of Barley exposed to salt stress under different levels of potassium nutrition. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 4(3):323-330.
    18. Food and Agricultur Organization (2005). Fertilizer use by crop in the Islamic Republic of Iran. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0037e.pdf. (accessed May 2019).
    19. Filho, M.C.M.T., Salatie´ r, B., Andreotti, M., Benett, C.G.S., Arf, O., and Sa, M.E. 2014. Wheat nitrogen fertilization under no till on the low altitude brazilian cerrado. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37: 1732–1748.
    20. Fogle, V.W. and Munns, D.N. 1973. Effect of Salinity on the Time Course of Wheat Seedling Growth. Plant Physiology, 51: 987-988.
    21. Grattan, S.R. and Grieve, C.M. 1999. Mineral nutrient acquistion and response by plants grown in saline environments. In: Pessarakli, M. (Eds.), Hand book of plant and crop stress. CRC Press, Marcel Dikker, New York. pp: 203-226.
    22. Hajinia, S., Zarea, M.J., Rejali, F., and Varma, A. 2012. Yield and yield components of wheat as affected by salinity and inoculation with Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 11: 113–121.
    23. Hanson, B.R., Grattan, S.R., and Fulton, A. 2006. Agricultural salinity and drainage, United States of America. Department of Land, 164.
    24. Jackson, M.L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, 498.
    25. Jones, J.B. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, 282.
    26. Karimizarchi, M. 2015. A Guideline for Wheat Nitogen Fertilization. Sahrasharq Press, Mashhad. (in Persian).
    27. Karimi, M. 2019. Wheat responses to the interactive effects between salinity and potassium sulphate fertilization. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 1(12); 239-249. (in Persian).
    28. Khayatnezhad, M. and Gholamin, R. 2010. Study of Nacl salinity effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars at germination stage. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 9 (2): 128-132.
    29. Khoshgoftarmanesh, A., Razizadeh, A., Eshqizadeh, H., Sharifi, H.R., Savaqebi, Q., Afyuni, D., and Tadayyonnejad, M. 2012. Comparison of different spring wheat genotypes based on their response to iron fertilization in a calcareous soil. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 15 (58): 99-107. (in Persian).
    30. Kim, H., Jeong, H., Jeon, J., Bae, S. 2016. Effects of irrigation with saline water on crop growth and yield in greenhouse cultivation. Water, 8(4):1-9.
    31. Lemon, J. 2007. Nitrogen management for wheat protein and yield in the Esperance port zone. Western Australia Department of Agriculture and Food. 27.
    32. Malhi, S.S., A.M., Johnston, J.J., Schoenau, Z.H., Wang., and Vera, C.L. 2006. Seasonal biomass accumulation and nutrient uptake of wheat, barley and oat on a Black Chernozem soil in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86: 1005-1014.
    33. Mojid, M.A, Murad, K.F.I., Tabriz, S.S., Wyseure, G.C.L. 2013. An advantageous level of irrigation water salinity for wheat cultivation. Journal of Bangladesh Agriculture University, 11(1):141–146.
    34. Moshiri, F., Shahabi, A.A., Keshavarz, P., Khoogar, Z., Feiziasl, V., Tehrani, M.M., Asadirahmani, H., Samavat, S., Qeibi, M.N., Sadri, M.H., Rashidi, N., and Khademi, Z. 2014. Guidelines for Integrated Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Management of Wheat. Sana Press, Tehran. (in Persian).
    35. Motesharezadeh, B., Vatanara; F., and Savaghebi, G.R. 2015. Effect of potassium and zinc on some responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under salinity stress. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 29: 243-381. (in Persian).
    36. Orloff, S., Wright, S., and Ottman, M. 2012. Nitrogen Management Impacts on wheat yield and protein.http://www.alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/symposium/2012f/files/.../12CAS-12_Orloff_Nitrogen Management .pdf. (accessed May 2018).
    37. Page, A.L. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America. 1143.
    38. Parsa, A.A. and Karimian, N. 1975. Effect of sodium chloride on seedling growth of two major varieties of Iranian pistachio. Journal of Horticultural Science, 50: 41-46.
    39. Qadir, M., Quillerou, E., Nangia, V., Murtaza, G., Singh, M., Thomas, R.J., Dreschel, P., and Noble, A.D. 2014. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Natural Resource Forum, 38: 282–295.
    40. Rad, M.H., Meshkat, M.A., and Soltani, M. 2009. The effects of drought stress on some saxual‘s (Haloxylon aphyllum) morphological characteristics. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 16: 34-43. (in Persian).
    41. Rezvanimoghaddam, P. and Koocheki, A. 2001. Research history on salt affected lands of Iran: Present and future prospects–Halophytic ecosystem. In Taha, F.K. (ed.), Prospects of saline agriculture. International Center for Biosaline Agricuture, Dubai, pp: 83-97.
    42. Salehuddin, M., Nasrin, J., Muhammad Ziaur, R., and Kazi Md Wayaz, H. 2017. Growth and yield response of wheat genotypes to salinity at different growth stages. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 11(2): 60-67.
    43. Skudra, I. and Ruža, A. 2015. Nitrogen content changes in winter wheat (Triticum Aestivum) depending on fertilizer norms. In Sandija Z.R. (ed.), Nordic view to sustainable rural development. Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists, Latvia, pp: 170–174.
    44. Tariqjan, M., Jamalkhan, M., Khani, A., Arif, M., Shafi, M.and Lahwheat, F. 2010. Nitrogen indices response to nitrogen source and application time. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(6): 4267-4279.
    45. S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils.United states departiment of agriculture Press. 159.
    46. Valizadeh, M. and Moghaddam, M. 2012. Experimental designs in agriculture. Parivar Press. 395. (in Persian).
    47. Watanabe, F.S., Olsen, S.R. 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorous in water and NaHCO3 extract from soil. Soil Science of American Procedure, 29: 677-678.
مهندسی زراعی
دوره 43، شماره 1
اردیبهشت 1399
صفحه 15-34
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار