مهندسی زراعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بررسی تاثیر دو باکتری Pseudomonas sp و Enterobacter cloacae بر اشکال کربن خاک در کشت دو گیاه ذرت و گندم در ریشه‌دان (ریزوباکس)

نوع مقاله : کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران

2 گروه خاکشناسی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران

چکیده

به منظور بررسی تاثیر باکتری­های محرک رشد بر برخی ویژگی‌های شیمیایی و بیولوژیکی خاک تحت کشت ذرت و گندم، آزمایشی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی شامل دو گیاه ذرت و گندم و سه سطح مایه‌زنی شامل بدون باکتری، Pseudomonas sp. strain Rhizo_9 و Enterobacter cloacae strain Rhizo_33 در 3 تکرار در گلدان‌های تقسیم شده (ریزوباکس) و در شرایط گلخانه­ اجرا گردید. در پایان دوره کشت، گیاه برداشت و خاک­های­ ریزوسفری1 (چسبیده به ریشه)، ریزوسفری2 (چسبیده به مش) وغیرریزوسفری (دور از مش) جدا و برخی ویژگی­های خاک اندازه­گیری شدند. نتایج نشان داد میزان هر یک از اجزاء کربن و همچنین تنفس پایه و برانگیخته در تیمارهای دارای باکتری بیشتر از شاهد و در خاک تحت کشت ذرت بیشتر ازخاک تحت کشت گندم بود. بیشترین میزان تنفس پایه میکروبی (31/0 میلی­گرم CO2 بر گرم بر روز)، تنفس برانگیخته (65/1 میلی­گرم CO2 بر گرم بر روز)، کربن قابل اکسید با پرمنگنات (1/213 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم) و کربن زیتوده میکروبی (53/17 میلی­گرم بر صد گرم) درخاک ریزوسفری1 در کشت ذرت مایه‌زنی شده با باکتری سودوموناس و بیشترین مقدار کربن آلی (82/0 درصد)، کربن محلول در آب سرد (1727 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم) و کربن محلول در آب داغ (955 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم) درخاک ریزوسفری1 در کشت ذرت مایه‌زنی شده با باکتری انتروباکتر به دست آمد که نشان‌دهنده تاثیر متفاوت دو باکتری بر افزایش اجزاء گوناگون کربن خاک می‌باشد. همچنین کاربرد هر دو باکتری موجب افزایش وزن خشک ریشه و اندام هوایی هر دو گیاه شد که در این میان تاثیر انتروباکتر بیشتر از سودوموناس بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of pseudomonas sp and enterobacter cloacae on the distribution of carbon forms in the soil under corn and wheat cultivated in rhizobox

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marzieh Mazraeh 1
  • Roya Zalaghi 2
  • Naiemeh Enayatizamir 1

1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,Iran.

2 Soil Science department, Agriculture faculty, Shahid Chamran university of Ahvaz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction Growth-stimulating bacteria are now proposed as an alternative to chemical fertilizers in order to increase soil fertility in sustainable agriculture. Biofertilizers are also expressed as microbial inoculants that are capable of removing soil nutrients from an inaccessible state through biological processes. Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPRs) refer to a broad group of susceptible bacteria, which grow alongside the plant as the host and stimulate plant growth. On the other hand, these microorganisms in the soil are able to stimulate and improve biological indicators, such as microbial carbon biomass, microbial respiration, and microbial yield, and may also affect different forms of carbon in the soil. Among the PGPRs, it is possible to refer to Enterobacter and Pseudomonas. Pseudomonas are bacteria present in all agro-soils and have different growth-promoting characteristics. Enterobacteriaceae family is a large group of bacteria that are naturally present in the water, soil, and materials that are corrupted and contaminated. To evaluate the biological changes of soil due to the activity of PGPRs, biochemical parameters (microbial respiration and microbial carbon biomass) are usually monitored in the plant's rhizosphere. The rhizobox is one of the tools used to study the changes in the rhizosphere, by limiting the roots in a certain volume of soil and facilitating the sampling of rhizosphere soil. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on some biological and chemical properties of the soil under Rhizobox conditions.
Materials and Methods In order to study some of the chemical and biological properties of the soil cultivated with maize and wheat and inoculated with growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), a completely randomized design, including two maize and wheat plants and three levels of inoculation, including non-inoculated, Pseudomonas sp. strain Rhizo_9 and Enterobacter cloacae strain Rhizo_33 in three replications in Rhizobox pots was done in greenhouse conditions. At the end of the period, the plants were harvested and the dry weight of roots and shoots was measured. Also, 3 soil samples were sampled from each rhizobox, as follows: rhizosphere 1 (soil clinging to the root), rhizosphere 2 (1 cm soil clinging to mesh), and non-rhizosphere (soil far from the mesh). Some soil characteristics, including basal respiration, substrate induced respiration, metabolic quotient, and soil carbon components (soil organic carbon, microbial carbon biomass, cold-water-soluble carbon, hot-water-soluble carbon, and permanganate oxidable carbon) were measured.
Results and Discussion Results showed that the amount of each carbon component, as well as basal and substrate-induced respiration in treatments with bacteria, was higher than non-bacterial treatments and these biological properties in the soil cultivated with maize were higher than those under wheat cultivation. According to the results, the highest amounts of the basal respiration (0.31 mg CO2 g-1 day-1), the substrate-induced respiration (1.65 mg CO2 g-1 day-1), the permanganate oxidable carbon (213.1 mg kg-1), and the microbial carbon biomass (17.53 mg 100g-1) were related to rhizosphere 1 soil of maize inoculated with Pseudomonas. The highest amounts of the organic carbon (0.82%), the cold-water-soluble carbon (1727 mg kg -1), and the hot-water-soluble carbon (955 mg kg-1) were related to rhizosphere 1 soil in maize inoculated with Enterobacter. This could show the differences between two bacteria in affecting on different forms of carbon in the soil.
Conclusion The results of this study showed that maize had a higher effect on carbon forms of soil that could be because of higher root biomass and probably higher root secretions of maize in comparison to wheat. Also, by increasing the distance from plant roots (from rhizosphere1 soil to bulk soil), different forms of carbon decreased that showed the impact of rhizosphere (plant roots and rhizospheric microorganisms) on physicochemical and biological characteristics.Inoculation of PGPR bacteria caused an increase in soil respiration and soil different carbon forms but the two bacteria were different in increasing various forms of soil carbon that seems to be related to different secretions or different effects of bacteria or plant-bacteria associate on soil carbon forms. Although inoculation of Pseudomonas resulted in a higher amount of microbial carbon biomass, inoculation of Enterobacter resulted in higher amounts of cold-water-soluble carbon, hot-water-soluble carbon, and soil organic carbon. Also, the application of two PGPR bacteria (Enterobacter was more effective) increased root and shoot dry weights of maize and wheat compared to non-bacterial treatments.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Enterobacter cloacae
  • Pseudomonas sp
  • Soil biological properties
  • Soil carbon forms
  • Soil rhizosphere
مراجع
  1. Al-Kaisi, M. (2001). Impact of Tillage and Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Carbon Sequestration. University Extension, Impact of Tillage and Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Carbon Sequestration. University Extension, 1-6.
  2. Amooaghaie, R., Mostajeran, M., and Emtiazi, G. 2002. The effect of strain and concentration of Azospirillum brasilense bacterium on growth and development of root in wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 33(2) : 213-222.
  3. Anderson, J.P.E. 1982. Soil Respiration. PP. 831-872. In: A.L. Page et al. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd ed. Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, U.S.A.
  4. Anderson, T.H. and Domsch, K.H. (1990). Application of eco-physiological quociente (qCO2 and Dq) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22, 251–255.
  5. Aubert, M., Bureau, F., Alard, D., and Bardat, J. 2004. Effect of tree mixture on the humic epipedon and vegetation diversity in managed beech forests (Normandy, France). Canadian Journal of Forest Reserch, 34:233-248.
  6. Bais, H.P., Weir, T.L., Perry, L.G., Gilroy, S., and Vivanco, J.M. 2006.The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57: 233-66.
  7. Baghban-Tabiat S. and Rasouli-Sadaghiani, M. 2012. Investigation of Zn utilization and acquisition efficiency in different wheat genotypes at greenhouse conditions. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 23 (2): 17-32. (In Persian).
  8. Barajas-Aceres, M. 2005. Comparison of different microbial biomass and activity measurement methods in metal-contaminated soils. Journal of Bioresource Technology, (96):1405-1414.
  9. Cheshire, M. (1979). Nature and origin of carbohydrates in soils. Academic Press, London.
  10. Cheng, W.Q., Zhang, Q., Coleman, D.C., Ronald Carrol, C., and Hoffman, C.A. 1996. Is available carbon limiting microbial respiration in the rhizosphere? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28: 1283-1288
  11. Chen, C.R., Condron, L.M. Davis, M.R. and Sherlock, R.R. 2002. Phosphorus dynamics in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and radiate pine (Pinusradiate D. Don.). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34: 487–499.
  12. Cohen, E., Okon, Y., Kigel, J., Nur, I., and Henis, Y. 1980. Increase in dry weight and total nitrogen content in Zea mays and Setaria italica associated with nitrogen-fixing Azospirillum. Plant Physiology, 66: 746-749.
  13. Dilly, O. and Munch, J.C. 1996. Microbial biomass content, basal respiration and enzyme activities during the course of decomposition of leaf litter in a black alder (Aluns Glutinosa (L). Gaertn.) Forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28: 1073-1081.
  14. Doran, J. and Parkins, T. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J. W., Coleman, D. C., Bezdicek, D. F., Stewart, B. A. (eds.), and Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 3-21.
  15. Fu, U., Liu, C., Ding, N., Lin, Y., and Guo, B. 2010. Ameliorative effects of inoculation with the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas sp. DWI on growth of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) seedlings under salt stress. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 1994-2000.
  16. Garcia-Orenes, F., Guerrero, C., Mataix-Solera, J., Navarro-Pedreno, J., Gomez, I., and Mataix-Beneyto, J. 2005. Factors controlling the aggregate stability and bulk density in two different degraded soils amended with biosolids. Soil and Tillage Research, 82: 65-76.
  17. Ghani, A., Dexter, M., and Perrott, K.W. 2003.Hot-water extractable carbon in the soil:a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilisetion,grazing and cultiveation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35:1231-1243.
  18. Gupta, P.K. 2007. Soil, Plant, Water and fertilizer analysis. 2thd ed. Agrobios (india), 36: 3119-3121.
  19. Hauser, L., Tandy, S., Schulin, R., and Nowack, B. 2005. Column extraction of heavy metals from soils using the biodegradable chelating agent EDDS. Environmental Science Technology, 3: 6819-6824.
  20. Haynes, R.J. 2005. Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: An Overview Advances in Agronomy, 85: 221-268.
  21. He, L.Y., Chen, Z.J., Ren, G.D., and Sheng, X.F. 2009. Increased cadmium and lead uptake of a cadmium hyperaccumulator tomato by cadmium-resistant bacteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72: 1343-1348.
  22. Helal, H.M. and Sauerbeck, D. 1984. Influence of plant roots on C and P metabolism in soil. Plant and Soil, 76(1-3): 175-182.
  23. Jutur, P.P. and Reddy, A.R. 2007. Isolation, purification and properties of new restriction endonucleases from Bacillus badius and Bacillus lentus. Microbiological Research, 162: 378-383.
  24. Kasim, W.A., Osman, M.E., Omar, M.N., El-Daim, I.A.A., Bejai, S., and Meijer, J. 2013. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 32(1), 122-130.
  25. Lasserre-Joulin, F., Vong, P.C., and Guckert, A. 2001. Evolution of soluble organic carbon in the rhizosphere and in corresponding non-rhizosphere soil in field-grown oilseed rape and barley. Immobilisation and turn-over of sulphur-35 in the rhizosphere soil. Plant nutrition, 624-625.
  26. Mandal, U.K., Yadav, S.K., Sharma, K.L., Ramesh, V., and Venkanna, K. 2011. Estimating permanganate-oxidizable active carbon as quick indicator for assessing soil quality under different land-use system of rainfed Alfisols, Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 81 (10): 927-931.
  27. Miller, H.J., Henken, G., and Van Veen, J.A. 1989. Variation and composition of bacterial population in the rhizosphere of maize, wheat and grass cultivars. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 15: 657-660.
  28. Naseri R., Barary M., Zarea M.J., Khavazi K., and Tahmasebi Z. 2017a. Effect of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Mycorrhizal fungi on some activities of antioxidative enzymes, physiological characteristics of wheat under dry land conditions. Iranain Journal of Dryland Agriculture, 6 (1): 1-34. (In Persian).
  29. Olsen, S.R. and L.E. Sommers. 1982. Phosphorus. In: A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part1 chemical and biological properties. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 4013-430.
  30. Patten, C. L. and Glick, B.R. 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(8), 3795-3801.
  31. Pereira, J.L., Picanco, M.C., Silva, A.A., Santos, E.A., Tome, H.V.V., and Olarte, J.B. 2008. Effects of glyphosate and endosulfan on soil microorganisms in soybean crop. Planta Daninha, 26: 56–62.
  32. Saharan, B.S. and Nehra, V. 2011. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: A Critical Review. Life Science and Medicine Research, 21: 1-30.
  33. Sharma, V., Hussain, S., Sharma, K., and Arya, V. 2014. Labile carbon pools and soil organic carbon stocks in the foothill Himalayas under different land use systems. Geoderma, 232: 81-87.
  34. Suman, A., Lal, M., Singh, A.K., and Gaur, A. 2006. Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 98: 698–704.
  35. Walkley, A., and Black, C.A. 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soils organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 33:29-38.
  36. Wu, B., Cao, S.C., Li, Z.H., Cheung, Z.G., and Wong, K.C. 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth. Geoderma, 125: 155-162.
  37. Yang, Y., Ratt, D., Smets, B.F., Pignatello, J.J., and Grasso, D. 2001. Mobilization of soil organic matter by complexing agents and implications for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon desorption. Chemosphere, 43: 1013-1021.
  38. Zahir, A.Z., Arshad, M., Frankenberger, W.F. 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 81:97-168.
  39. Zimmermann, S. and Fery, B. (2001). Soil respiration and microbial properties in an asid forest soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34: 1727-1773.
  40. Zhao, Q., Zeng, D., and Fan, Z. 2010. Nitrogen and phosphorus transformations in the rhizospheres of three tree species in a nutrient-poor sandy soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 46: 341–346.
مهندسی زراعی
دوره 42، شماره 1
خرداد 1398
صفحه 81-93
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار