تأثیر روش های مختلف کاشت بر عملکرد گندم در شمال شهرستان اهواز

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی و مکانیزاسیون، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مهندسی ماشین های کشاورزی و مکانیزاسیون، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان، ایران

3 دانشجوی مهندسی مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان، ایران

چکیده

استفاده از روش­های خاک­ورزی مرسوم و خطی­کارها و بعد از آن آبیاری غرقابی یکی از روش­های غالب عملیات زراعی در تولید گندم توسط کشاورزان در جنوب غربی ایران است. روش کاشت گندم، درصرفه­جویی مصرف بذر و افزایش عملکرد می­تواند تأثیر­گذار باشد؛ به­همین منظور، برای بررسی عوامل مؤثر در عملکرد گندم، آزمایشی دو ساله در چهار تکرار با طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در مزرعه پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان اجرا شد. در این آزمایش، پس از شخم در عمق 25 سانتیمتری با خاک­ورز برگردان­دار و دو مرتبه دیسک افست، تعداد 7 تیمار متفاوت کاشت گندم و آبیاری مورد مقایسه قرار گرفتند. تیمار­ها، شامل خطی کار + آبیاری غرقابی (P)، کاشت و ایجاد جوی و پشته به فواصل 60 و 75 سانتی‌متر (PF) و همچنین ایجاد جوی و پشته و بعد از آن کاشت (FP) با فواصل جوی و پشته 60 و 75 سانتی‌متر به ترتیب به­نام تیمار­های 60 PF_و 75 ,PF_60 FP_و 75_FP و تیمارهای سه خط کشت روی پشته بنام 75_3FP_ و 60_3FP_ بودند. تیمار 75_FP که بیانگر استفاده از دستگاه جوی و پشته­ساز و پس از آن کاشت (داخل جوی و روی پشته) است، مناسب­ترین تیمار کاشت با میزان عملکرد 5966 و5070 کیلوگرم در هکتار به­ترتیب در سال­های اول و دوم بوده است. از طرفی استفاده از دستگاه جوی و پشته­ساز قبل از کاشت در تیمار 60ـFP عملکرد بیشتری را نسبت به تیمار خطی­کار به تنهایی P)) در سطح (5%p£) نشان داد. تیمار خطی­کار P)) که در آن از دستگاه جوی و پشته­ساز استفاده نشده و کاشت به روش مرسوم بوده است، حداقل تولید (4883 و 4271 کیلوگرم در هکتار به ترتیب در سال اول و دوم) را نشان داد؛ همچنین مقدار زیست توده در تیمارهایی که ابتدا دستگاه جوی و پشته­ساز و سپس کاشت انجام شده، به­طور معنی­داری (5%p£) نسبت به روش مرسوم افزایش یافت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of different planting methods on wheat yield in north of Ahvaz city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Amin Asoodar 1
  • Afshin Marzban 2
  • Fatemeh Afsharnia 3
1 Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering ِDepartment Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
2 Ramin university
3 Department of biosystems engineering, Ramin agsiculture and natural resources university of Khuzestan
چکیده [English]

Introduction Wheat is the main food commodity of Iranian population and major cultivating crop, grown on nearly half of the country’s rain-fed area as well as one-third of the irrigated area. Despite the availability of high yielding cultivars for different climates, the average wheat grain yield in the country is around 3527 kg ha-1. Lower wheat grain yield could be due to unavailability of recommended varieties seed, delay in planting, inappropriate planting methods, excess use of fertilizers and inefficient water management. Irrigated wheat production in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran is generally practiced under conventional tillage systems. Crop producers in southwestern part of  Iran are traditionally using conventional tillage (plowing with moldboard plow followed by double disking) for cultivating various crops. Most of the farmers use grain drills for sowing wheat because of uniformity of planting depth as compared to seed spreaders. The aims of the study were to determine whether different methods of sowing, such as grain drills (followed by flooding irrigation), row crop planting, and combination of furrowers (75 and 60 cm) and seeders (12 cm of sowing space) alter the agronomic performance of winter wheat. Therefore, selection of suitable sowing method plays an important role in the placement of seed at proper depth, which ensures better emergence and subsequent crop growth. 
Material and methods The study was conducted on a silt clay loam soil (Carbonatic Typic Torrifluvent) in research farms of Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University, Ahvaz, Iran, with wheat-wheat- corn crop rotation. The soil was representative of a large area of arable land in the Khuzestan province. Conventional tillage was practiced by moldboard plow ( 25 cm depth) followed by disc harrow twice (nearly 10 cm depth). The two year experiment was conducted based on completely randomized block design in four replicates. 140 kg/ha of wheat (Triticum aestivum L), Chenab cultivar was sown at 50 mm depth for all treatments. The experimental treatments were 20 furrow opener rain drill with 12 cm line space (P), combination of grain drill-furrower (PF60 and PF75) with 60 and 75 cm furrow spaces, also furrower-grain drill (FP60 and FP75 cm) and furrower –grain drill with 3 planted rows on beds (FP3_60 and FP3_75 cm). Soil conductivity of the experimental field (plots) ranged from 1.2 to 3.3 ds mG. The soil texture was silty clay loam with the range of clay content from 34 to36%, and N, P and K contents of the soil were 0.8 to 1, 6.1 to 16.2 and 117 to 192 mg kgG, respectively.
Results and discussion Wheat grain yield obtained from all treatments was different; however, harvested grain after FP_75 was the highest compared to others. The highest amount of yield was 5966.7 kg/ha for the first year and 5070 kg/ha for the second year compared to simple planting (P) which was the lowest (4883 and 4271 kg/ha respectively for 2 interval years). Analysis of variance for grain yield indicated that FP-75 had a significant difference (p < 0.01) as compared to others, but grain yield for furrow spaces from 60 to 75 cm was not significantly different. However, the use of furrowers showed significant effects on wheat grain yield. Crop yield and biomass were shown to be different where the furrow was made before sowing. The use of grain drills without furrowers had a great negative effect on crop biomass and grain yield. The results obtained from the second year were similar to the first year. The application of furrow before sowing showed maximum crop yield and biomass, so that the highest and the lowest biomass belonged to FP-75 with 14817 kg ha-1 and P with 11731 kg ha-1, respectively. The harvest index was not significantly different among treatments. Similar results were obtained in wheat plots after harvesting.
Conclusion The overall results from this study indicated that the values of crop yield and biomass were maximum where the furrow was made before sowing, as FP-75 treatment had the highest yield. So regarding non-problem of soil salinity in the north of Khuzestan, the use of furrow before sowing can be considered as an appropriate tillage and sowing system for wheat production in the semi-arid region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Furrowers
  • wheat
  • Furrow planting
  • raised bed planting
  • row planting and Grain drill
  1. Alijani, F., Karbasi, A. R. and Mozafari Mosen, M. 2011. Survey of the Effects of Climate Change on Yield of Irrigated Wheat in Iran. Agricultural Economics and Development, 19(76): 143-167.
  2. Asoodar, M. A. 2001. Improving Crop Growth with Direct Drilling under Dryland Condition, In International conference on Agricultural Science and Technology (ICAST), Beijing, China, November 7-9, 2001: 420-428.
  3. Asoodar, M. A., Bakhshandeh, A.M., Afrasiabi, H. and Shafeinia, A. 2006. Effects of press wheel Weight and Soil Moisture at Sowing on Grain Yield. Journal of Agronomy, 5 (20): 278-283. (In Persion)
  4. Bakker, D.M., Hanilton, G.J., Joulbrooke, D.J. and Spamn, C. 2005. The effect of raised beds on soil structure, water lodging, and productivity on duplex soils in western Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43:575-585.
  5. Barzegar, A.R., Asoodar, M.A., Khadish, A., Hashemi, A.M. and Herbert, S. J., 2003. Soil physical characteristics and chickpea yield responses to tillage treatments. Soil and Tillage Research, 71: 49-57.
  6. Fahong, W., Xuqing, W. and Sayre, K. 2004. Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Field Crops Research, 87: 35-42.
  7. Ghorbani, M.H. and Hartunian, H. 2011. Response growth and yield to plant density and row space under rain fed conditions in wheat. Journal of Crop Production, 4(2): 139-154. (In Persion)
  8. Hakoomat, A., I. Nadeem, A. Shakeel, Ahmad Naeem, S. and Naeem, S. 2013. Performance of late sown wheat crop under different planting geometries and irrigation regimes in arid climate. Soil and Tillage Research, 130: 109–119.
  9. Hassanzadeh Khankahdani, H., Aboutalebi Jahromi, A. and Zakerifard Mollahassani, E. 2013. Comparison the effect of various planting methods on yield and yield component of onion cultivars in short-day conditions in Minab. Agricultural Crop Management, 15(1): 111-123. (In Persion)
  10. Iftikhar, T., Babar, L.K., Zahoor, S. and Ghafoor Khan, N. 2010. Impact of land pattern and hydrological properties of soil on cotton yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(5): 3023-3028.
  11. Jamshidi, A. R. and Asoodar, M. A. 2010. The effects of planters on ridge and furrow for wet and dry planting on wheat yield in north of Khuzestan. Quarterly Journal of Plant Management, 2(5): 1-10. (In Persion)
  12. Karbasi, A. and Ghafari, Z. 2008. The impact of weather change on crop yield distribution. 6th Asian society of Agricultural Economics International conference (ASAE).
  13. Karimi, A., Meskarbashee, M., Nabipour, M. and Broomandnasab, S. 2012. The Study of Some Quantity and Quality Characteristics of Two Wheat Cultivars Under Different Planting Method and Irrigation Levels Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 21(4): 95-104. (In Persion)
  14. Koocheki, A., Bakhshaei, S., Tabarraei, A. and Jafari, L. 2014. Effect of plant density and planting pattern on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Balangu (Lallenamntia royleana Benth.). Agroecology, 6(2): 229-237. (In Persion)
  15. Li, Q.Q., Zhou, X.B., Chen, Y.H. and Yu, S.L. 2010. Grain yield and quality of winter wheat in different planting patterns under deficit irrigation regimes. Plant, Soil and Environment, 10: 482–487.
  16. Mousavi, Gh., Asoodar, M. A. and Poormohammadi, P. 2013. The study of tillage methods, planting pattern and residue management on canola water use efficiency. The 8th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering (Biosystem) and mechanization. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persion)
  17. Safari, A., Asoodar, M. A., Ghasemi nejad, M. and Abdali, A. 2013. Effect of Residue Management, Different Conservation Tillage and Seeding on Soil Physical Properties and Wheat Grain Yield. Journal of Agricultural science and sustainable production, 23(2): 49-59. (In Persion)
  18. Seyed Maasoom, S. N., Fathi, G. H., Farzadi, H. and Saeedipour, S. 2013. Effects of previous crops and different planting patterns on weed density reduction and wheat yield in Khouzestan climate conditions. Crop Physiology Journal, 16(4): 65-79. (In Persion)
  19. Sikander, K., Hussain, I., Sohail, M., Kissana, N. S. and Abbas, S.G. 2003. Effect of different planting methods on yield components of wheat. Asian Journal Plant Science, 2(10):811-813.
  20. Yousefi, Z., Asoodar, M. A., Haghnazari, A. and Shekari, F. 2013. Effect of planting techniques and seed rates on rapeseed emergence, plant establishment and grain yield. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 96: 1-10. (In Persion)
  21. Zhang, J., Sun, J., Duan, A., Wang, J., Shen, X. and Liu, X. 2007. Effects of different planting patterns on water use and yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China. Agricultural Water Management, 92: 41-47.