نوع مقاله : کاربردی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه آب و خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی گروه آب و خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران.

چکیده

مدیریت بقایای گیاهی همواره یکی از مسائل مورد توجه در بخش کشاورزی و صنایع وابسته آن بوده است. افزودن این بقایا به خاک اثرهای چشمگیر بر ویژگی­های شیمیایی، فیزیکی و بیولوژیکی خاک دارد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر بقایای برگ انگور و پوست انار بر پایداری ساختمان و آبگریزی خاک در شرایط شور بود. بدین منظور بقایای برگ انگور و پوست انار در سطح صفر، 2 و 5 درصد و شوری در سه سطح 5/1، 7 و 15 دسی­زیمنس بر متر مطالعه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که افزودن بقایای پوست انار سبب افزایش بیش­تر کربن آلی خاک و غلظت کربوهیدرات قابل عصاره­گیری با آب داغ و اسید رقیق خاک نسبت به بقایای برگ انگور شد. افزایش سطح بقایا و شوری نیز سبب افزایش کربن آلی و غلظت کربوهیدرات­ها در خاک شده بود. افزایش شوری محلول خاک آبگریزی خاک مورد مطالعه را افزود. همچنین افزودن بقایای پوست انار به خاک سبب افزایش بیش­تر آبگریزی و بهبود پایداری ساختمان خاک شد. افزایش مقدار بقایای گیاهی مورد استفاده نیز با افزایش کربن آلی خاک و غلظت کربوهیدرات­ها در خاک  سبب افزایش آبگریزی در خاک و کاهش رس قابل پراکنش خاک شد. در مجموع می­توان نتیجه گرفت که در استفاده از بقایای برگ انگور و پوست انار در خاک علاوه بر جنبه­های مثبت ناشی از افزایش ماده آلی خاک باید به برخی اثرات منفی آبگریزی ایجاد شده به ویژه در خاک­های شور و در طولانی مدت نیز توجه نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of grape leaves and pomegranate peel on soil structural stability and water repellency in different salinity levels

نویسندگان [English]

  • Vajiheh Dorostkar 1
  • Reyhane Vali 2

1 Assistant professor, Water and Soil Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

2 BSc Student, Water and Soil Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction Crop production in arid and semi arid regions especially in saline soils always has many problems. Soil low organic matter content is one of the limiting factors in arid condition. Incorporation of plant residues is a good strategy for increasing the soil organic carbon and consequently for improving soil physical quality (34). However, some studies have shown that addition of organic matter in to the soil can increase soil water repellency (17, 18). This study was conducted to investigate the effect of grape leaves and pomegranate peels on the soil structural stability and soil water repellency in different salinity levels. 
Materials and Methods The arable soil was collected from the soil surface layer (0–20 cm) of Bastam Agricultural Research field in Semnan province and passed through a 4 mm sieve. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with three treatments including plant residues type (Grape leaves and pomegranate peels), amount of plant residues (0, 2 and 5 g 100 g-1 soil ) and salinity (1.5, 7 and 15 dS m-1). Plant residues were collected from grape and pomegranate gardens and after drying, milled and passed through a 1 mm sieve. Plant residues were mixed with soil and salinity treatment was applied with calcium chloride salt. Pots were filled with mixture of saline soil and plant residues and incubated in the greenhouse for 50 days. The soil organic carbon, soil hot water and diluted acid carbohydrate, soil microbial basal respiration, water dispersible clay and soil water repellency were measured at the end of the experiment. 
Results and Discussion Pomegranate peels increased the soil organic carbon content and hot water and diluted acid carbohydrates more than the grape leaves (Table 5) due to greater C:N ratio and lower microbial decomposability (37). Soil microbial basal respiration was 15.5% lower in pomegranate peel treatments than grape leaves and (Table 5). Water dispersible clay decreased by increasing the amount of plant residues (Table 8). Soil organic carbon increased by the amount of plant residues. Soil organic carbon is an important factor in stability of soil aggregate and consequently decreases the soil water dispersible clay (7). Strong negative correlation between soil organic carbon and soil water dispersible clay can confirm these results. In addition, the soil carbohydrates are known as an important factor in stability of aggregate especially for macroaggregates (40).  
Salinity increment from 1.5 to 15 dS m-1 caused a reduction in water dispersible clay from 45.1 to 31.2 g kg-1 soil (Table 9). Calcium as a divalent cation is an important factor in soil structural stability and probably decreased the soil water dispersible clay (7).
Soil repellency index was greater than 1.95 in all treatments and ranged from 2.3 and 5.9 in different treatments. These results indicated subcritical soil water repellency in soil. Soil water repellency index increased 38 and 67 percent in treatments with 2 and 5 g residues 100g-1 soil compared to control treatment (no residue) (Figure 3). In addition, soil hydrophobicity was 10% higher in the pomegranate peels treatments than in grape leaves treatments (Figure 4). Soil organic carbon and soil hot water and diluted acid extractable carbohydrates concentration increased by the plant residues addition. The soil organic components have a hydrophobic and a hydrophilic parts and the orientation of hydrophobic parts on the soil particle surface can make a repellent soil surface (6).
Soil calcium (Ca+2) concentration increased by salinity. This divalent cation in the soil solution could act as a bridge between the soil particles and functional groups of dissolved organic matters. This bridge could facilitate covering of soil particles by hydrophobic compounds and make a more stable soil structure by flocculating soil particle at high salinity levels (7). The hydrophobic coatings on the soil surfaces increased the solid–liquid interfacial free energy (γsl) and decreased the solid surface free energy (γsg) as indirect effects of salinity on repellency. In addition, water entering into the soil immediately dissolved the soluble salts which had precipitated in the initially dry soil. There is some evidence showing that surface tension of water (γlg) increases with salts. Decrease of γsg and the increase of γsl and γlg might cause the repellency increment (43).
Calcium bridge between soil particles could improve the soil structure with salinity increment. Increasing the SE by salinity in this study confirms this hypothesis. The soil SW depends on pore geometry and hydrophobic coating on soil particles, but the soil SE only depends on pore geometry. Thus, increasing the SE might be an indicator for better pores connection and stable structure (15).
Conclusion Many grape leaves and pomegranate peels are produced in Iran every year. These plant residues are potentially a good source for increasing the soil organic carbon. Our results showed that incorporation of these plant residues in to the soil could increase the soil organic carbon and carbohydrate concentration and improve the soil aggregates stability. However incorporation of residues into the soil increased the soil water repellency. In addition salinity increment induced soil hydrophobicity. More detailed studies are needed to understand the positive or negative effects of this subcritical hydrophobicity development in saline soils. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethanol and water sorptivity
  • Subcritical soil water
  • repellency
  • Plant residues
  • Salinity
  1. Aelamanesh, P., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Mahboubi, A.A., Ahrens, B., and Sinegani, A.S. 2014. Water repellency in calcareous soils under different land uses in western Iran. Pedosphere, 24: 378–390.  
  2. Akbari, F., Pouri, K., Kamkar, B., and Alimoghadam, S.I. 2012. The effect of wheat, alfalfa, corn, soybeans and cotton on soil K and its uptake by wheat plants. Journal of Agroecology, 2: 163–171. (In Persian)
  3. Alef, K. 1995. Soil respiration. In Alef, K., and Nannipieri, P. (Eds.), Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Harcourt Brace and Company Pub, London. pp: 214–216. 
  4. Bachmann, J., Horton, R., and Van der Ploeg, V. 2001. Isothermal and nonisothermal evaporetion from four sandy soils of different water repellency. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 64: 1599–1607. 
  5. Bhattacharyya, R., Chandra, S., Singh, R.D., Kundu, S., Srivastva, A.K., and Gupta, H.S. 2007. Long-term farmyard manure application effects on properties of a silty clay loam soil under irrigated wheat-soybean rotation. Soil and Tillage Research, 94: 386–396. 
  6. Blanco-Canqui, H., and Lal R. 2009. Extent of soil water repellency under long-term no-till soils. Geoderma, 149: 171–180. 
  7. Bronick, C. J., and Lal, R. 2005. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124: 3–22. 
  8. Burt, R. 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual: Soil survey investigations. Version 4.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Nebraska, United States.  
  9. Burt, R., Reinsch, T.G., and Miller, W.P. 1993. A micro-pipette method for water dispersible clay. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 24: 2531–2544. 
    1. Dekker, L., and Ritsema, W.1994. How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil. 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resource Research, 30: 2507–2517. 
    2. Doerr, S.H., and Thomas, A.D. 2000. The role of soil moisture in controlling water repellency: new evidence from forest soils in Portugal. Journal of Hydrology, 231: 134–147.  
    3. Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P.A., and Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method of determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry,  28: 350–356.   
    4. Falahati Marvast, A., Hosseinpu, A., and Tabatabaei, S.H. 2013. Effect of salinity and sewage sludge on heavy metal availability and uptake by barley plant. Journal of Water and Soil, 27: 985–997.  (In Persian with English abstract)
    5. Fallahzade, J., and Hajabbasi, M.A. 2010. Evaluation of organic matter storage in aggregate of clayey soils under degraded pasture and cropland in central Zagros. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 17: 179–194. (In Persian with English abstract)
    6. Feeney, D.S., Hallett, P.D., Rodger, S., Bengough, A.G., White, N.A., and Young, I.M. 2006. Impact of fungal and bacterial biocides on microbial induced water repellency in arable soil. Geoderma, 135: 72–80. 
    7. Ghani, A., Dexter, M., and Perrott, K.W. 2003. Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilization, grazing and cultivation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35: 1231–1243. 
    8. Graber, E.R., Tagger, S., and Wallach, R. 2009. Role of divalent fatty acid salts in soil water repellency. Soil Science Society American Journal, 73: 541–549. 
    9. Hajiboland, R. 2013. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza in Amelioration of Salinity. In: Ahmad, P., Azooz, M.M., and Prasad, M.N.V. (Eds). Salt Stress in Plants: Signalling, Omics and Adaptations. Springer, New York. pp: 301–354.
    10. Hallett, P.D. 2007. An introduction to soil water repellency. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 
    11. Hallett, P.D., Gordon, D.C., and Bengough, A.G. 2003. Plant influence on rhizosphere hydraulic properties: direct measurements using a miniaturized infiltrometer. New Phytologist, 157: 597–603. 
    12. Hallett, P.D., and Young, I.M. 1999. Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity. European Journal of Soil Science, 50: 35–40. 
    13. Holthusen, D., Haas, C., Peth, S., and Horn, R. 2012. Are standard values the best choice? A critical statement on rheological soil fluid properties viscosity and surface tension. Soil and Tillage Research, 125: 61–71. 
    14. Hosseini, F., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Hajabbasi, M.A., and Sabzalian, M.R. 2015. Aboveground fungal endophyte infection in tall fescue alters rhizosphere chemical, biological, and hydraulic properties in texture-dependent ways. Plant and Soil, 388: 351–366. 
    15. Jafari, S., Chorom, M., Enayatizamir, N., and Motamedi, H. 2013. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Corynebacterium on some of soil microbial indexes in different salinity levels. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 35: 55–70. (In Persian)
    16. Kaplan, D.I., Bertsch, P.M., and Adriano, D.C. 1997. Mineralogical and physicochemical differences between mobile and non-mobile colloidal phases in reconstructed pedons. Soil Science Society American Journal, 61: 641–649.
    17. Leelamanie, D.A.L., and Karube, J. 2013. Soil–water contact angle as affected by the aqueous electrolyte concentration. Soil Science Plant Nutrition, 59: 501–508. 
    18. Liang, Y., Nikolic, M., Peng, Y., Chen, W., and Jiang, Y. 2005. Organic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37: 185–1195. 
    19. Lichner, L., Dlapa, P., Doerr, S.H., and Mataix-Solera, J. 2006. Evaluation of different clay minerals as additives for soil water repellency alleviation. Applied Clay Science, 31: 238–248.  
    20. Lipiec, J., Wojciga, A., and Horn, R. 2009. Hydraulic properties of soil aggregates as influenced by compaction. Soil and Tillage Research, 103: 170–177.
    21. Mirzaee, M., and Mahmoudabadi, M. 2015. Effect of different type and management of crop residues on soil physical properties and water infiltration. Journal of Soil Researches, 28: 659–671. (In Persian)
    22. Nahidan, S., and Nourbakhsh, F. 2010. Effect of Soil organic carbon history on some of soil biological properties. 11th Iranian Soil Congress. (In Persian)
    23. Nottidge, D.O., Ojeniyi, S.O. and Asawalam, D.O. 2005. Comparative effects of plant residues and fertilizer on soil properties in a humid ultisol. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, 15: 9–13. 
    24. Piccolo, A., and Mbagwu, J.S.C. 1999. Role of hydrophobic components of soil organic matter in soil aggregate stability. Soil Science Society American Journal, 63: 1801–1810.  
    25. Raiesi, F., and Aghababae, F. 2011. The decomposability of some plant residues and their susbsequent influence on soil microbial respiration and biomass, and enzyme activity. Journal of Water and Soil, 25: 863–873. (In Persian with English abstract)
    26. Rietz, D.N., and Haynes, R.J. 2003. Effects of irrigation- induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35: 845–854. 
    27. Shaver, T.M., Peterson, G.A., and Sherrod, L.A. 2003. Cropping intensification in dryland systems improves soil physical properties: regression relations. Geoderma, 116: 149–164. 
    28. Singh, Y., Singh, B., and Timsi na, J. 2005. Crop residue management for nutrient cycling and improving soil productivity in rice-based cropping systems in the tropics. Advances in Agronomy, 85: 289–407. 
    29. Sparling, G., Vojvodic-Vukovic, M., and Schipper, L.A. 1998. Hot-water soluble C as a simple measure of labile soil organic matter: the relationship with microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 1469–1472. 
    30. Tillman, R.W., Scotter, D.R., Wallis, M.G., and Clothier, B.E. 1989. Water-repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 27: 637–644.
    31. Tisdall, J.M. and Oades, J.M. 1982. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soil. Journal of Soil Science, 33: 141–163.
    32. Vogelmann, E.S., Reichert, J.M., Prevedello, J., Consensa, C.O.B., Oliveira, A.E., Awe, G.O., and Mataix-Solera, J. 2013. Threshold water content beyond which hydrophobic soils become hydrophilic: the role of soil texture and organic matter content. Geoderma, 209: 177–187.  
    33. Woche, S.K., Goebel, M.O., Kirkham, M.B., Horton, R., Van der Ploeg, R.R., and Bachmann, J. 2005. Contact angle of soils as affected by depth, texture, and land management. European Journal of Soil Science, 56: 239–251.
    34. Young, T. 1805. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 95: 65–87. 
    35. Yuan, B.C., Li, Z.Z., Liu, H., Gao, M., and Zhang, Y.Y. 2007. Microbial biomass and activity in salt affected soils under arid conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 35: 319–328.
    36. Zubair, M., Anwar, F., Ashraf, M., Ashraf A., and Chatha, S.A.S. 2012. Effect of green and farmyard manure on carbohydrates dynamics of salt-affected soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 12: 497–510.