اثر بقایای گیاهی بر شاخص‌های میکروبی خاک و برخی خصوصیات رشدی گیاه جو در سطوح مختلف شوری

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه خاک شناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 دانشیار گروه خاک شناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 استادیار گروه خاک شناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

به منظور بررسی اثر بقایای گیاهی بر روی برخی شاخص­­های میکروبی خاک از جمله کربن، فسفر و نیتروژن بیوماس میکروبی و خصوصیات رشدی گیاه جو در خاک شور، آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار  در دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز انجام گرفت. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل دو نوع بقایای گیاهی (کاه وکلش گندم و یونجه) در دو سطح ( ٠ و50 تن در هکتار) و در سه سطح شوری (2 ، 4  ، 8  دسی­زیمنس بر متر) در کشت گیاه جو به مدت 8 هفته در گلخانه انجام شد. شاخص­های میکروبی شامل C ،N و P زیست توده میکروبی، نسبت C/P و C/N میکروبی خاک و برخی فاکتورهای رشدی گیاه جو شامل طول ساقه ، میزان کلروفیل، وزن خشک ساقه و ریشه، سطح برگ و برخی عناصر غذایی در گیاه اندازه­گیری شدند؛ نتایج این آزمایش نشان داد که شوری باعث کاهش رشد گیاه جو و برخی شاخص­های  میکروبی در خاک گردید. افزودن مقدار 50 تن در هکتار  بقایای یونجه، اثر معنی­دار بر شاخص سطح برگ، ارتفاع گیاه، وزن خشک و میزان کلروفیل در سطوح مختلف شوری داشت. خاک­های حاوی بقایای یونجه حداکثر کربن، نیتروژن و فسفر زیست توده را داشتند و پس از آن بیشترین اثر در خاک تیمار شده با بقایای گندم دیده شد. به­طور خلاصه، نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که افزایش هر گونه بقایای گیاهی سبب تحریک شدید فعالیت میکروبی و بهبود وضعیت توده زنده میکروبی و افزایش قابلیت دسترسی غذایی می­گردد که این بستگی به نوع و کیفیت بقایای گیاهی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Plant Residues on Soil Microbial Parameters and Some Growth Characteristics of Barley at Different Levels of Soil Salinity

نویسندگان [English]

  • M Alizadeh 1
  • M Chorom 2
  • N Enayatizamir 3
چکیده [English]

Introduction: After salinity, drought is of the most common environmental stress for plants in the world and a significant proportion of natural ecosystems and agricultural world is located under salt stress. In general, preventing plant growth of salinity may be due to improper plant photosynthesis, and stomata closure due to the limitation of carbon dioxide is absorbed. Previous studies have shown an increase in the electrical conductivity of the soil with microbial biomass, microbial respiration, and plant residue decomposition rate is negative. The results of studies have showed that the organic matter in soils with high salinity levels even with low vegetation can cause grow the microbial populations resistant to salinity, rapidly. Therefore, the increase residual plants enhance the activity of soil microbes which are beneficial to decompose and release carbon dioxide, nitrate and other ingredients. In arid and semi-arid lands soil organic matter in the soils is generally poor, because of the high temperature maintain and preserve organic matter in these soils is very difficult. Although the use of mineral fertilizers is apparently the faster way is to maintain soil fertility, but the high cost of fertilizer, and cause soil pollution and environmental degradation, is unfavorable act. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of plant residues on soil microbial characteristics such as carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus biomass influence on barley plant growth at different levels of soil salinity.
Materials and Methods: To make salty soil 40 liters of salinity effluent collected with EC about 33.4 dS /m and after the initial analysis, was diluted and three levels of salinity (2, 4, 8 dS m) were created. After preparing the soil with 3 levels of salinity (2, 4, 8 dS/m), 2 types of debris from wheat straw and alfa alfa (2 levels, zero and 100 g per pot) with 3 replications (total of 36 pots) were prepared. After cultivation of barley seeds, the pots were irrigated. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design in a greenhouse. Wet pots were kept at 60 percent of field capacity and irrigation was done by weight. To evaluate the plant's response to the effects of crop residue added at the end of the experiment, after 60 days, shoot and root samples were collected. All samples of barley leaves and stems of the plants were collected two months after planting. The amount of chlorophyll by chlorophyll meter was measured manually by Spad units. Plant height was determined by ruler from the surface to the end of the cluster. For the measurement of pH and EC plant debris from shattered remnants extract ratio (1: 8) was used. Carbon and nitrogen biomass by fumigation extraction method was measured.
Results and Discussion: Effect of salinity and crop residue application on barley plant height was significant at 1% level. But, there was no significant interaction between salinity and treated straw. The effect of wheat residue treatment was significant on plant height, but showed a decreasing trend with increasing salinity. Comparison of means of salinity levels showed the greatest reduction in leaf area in 3 salinity levels of the treated straw and the lowest was of the hay treatment. The comparison of means of salinity levels showed that the treated straw had the lowest chlorophyll compared to other treatments. The effect of the addition of plant residues in different levels of salinity on microbial biomass carbon was significant at 1% level. Adding mineralization of organic waste leads to increased precursor enzymes and microbial growth increases. The results showed that moderate amounts of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus microbial biomass was affected by increasing salinity in reverse. The amount of phosphorus added to the soil was deeply influenced by phosphorus ratio of carbon to biomass and biomass is phosphorus. P ratio of carbon to biomass increased by reducing the availability of phosphorus. Changes in the ratio of carbon to microbial biomass P refers to changes in microbial communities in soil. Reduced microbial biomass carbon in soils containing straw because of organic compounds toxic like phenols produced the soil micro-organisms. Increased alfalfa and crop residue as organic fertilizer to the soil salinization significantly affects the microbial biomass nitrogen. Comparison of the results showed that microbial biomass phosphorus in 3 salinity levels was, at 1%, significantly different from control and treatment straw and in between treatments; alfalfa treatment significantly increased microbial biomass phosphorus.
Conclusion: The results indicated that salinity reduced height, leaf area and plant chlorophyll content of barley. Added plant residues at different levels of salinity, while increasing soil organic matter and soil microbial, somewhat affected the barley crop yields. This effect was different depending on the type and quality of plant residues. Hay debris due to available nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, reduced soil salinity, and crop yield was somewhat increased, but the impact of wheat residues was not observed on the plant atmosphere. The results also showed that with increasing salinity of soil, microbial indexes such as microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen was decreased.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Salinity
  • Barley
  • Microbial biomass
  • growth indices
  1. Abrol, I.P., and Yadav, J.S.P. 1988. Salt-affected soil and their management. FAO Soils Bulletin 39.
  2. Ahamadi, Z.T., and Mjnone Babian, J.N. 2002.  Plant growth in saline and bayer land. Mazandaran University Press, page 47.
  3. Batra, L., and Manna, M.C. 1997. Dehydrogenase activity and microbial biomass carbon in salt-affected soils of semiarid and arid regions. Arid Soil Research Rehabilitation, 11:295- 303.
  4. Bruce, S., and Ryan, M.H. 1997. Effect of wheat stubble on emergence and growth of canola and sunflower. U.S. Department of Agriculture Cris, 358. USA.
    1. Chen, C.R., Condron, L.M., Davis, M.R. and Sherlick, R.R. 2003. Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 177:35-43.
    2. Doran, J.W., Sarrantonio, M., and Liebig, M.A. 1996. Soil health and sustain ability. Advanced Agronomy, 56:2-54.
    3. Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis, In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9(1). A.S.A., Inc., S.S.S.A. Inc., Madison Publisher Wisconsin USA.
  5. Ghanadha, M.R., Amidy, R.A., and Postiny, K. 2005. Identification of salt tolerant wheat genotypes through tissue culture and germination tests. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 36 (1): 85-75.
  6. Hashmy Dezfuli, A., and Kuchky, M. 1995. Increase crop yield.  Mashhad SID . Press.
    1. Hesse, P.R. 1971. a text book of soil chemical analysis. John Murray. London.
    2. Kaur, B., Aggarwal, A.K., and Gupta, S.R. 1998. Soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization in salt-affected soils. Journal of Ecology Experimental Science, 24:103-111.
  7. Khajehpor, M.R. 1988. Crop rotation in sustainable agriculture, Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding of Iran.
    1. Killham, K. 1994. Soil Ecology. Cambridge University Press, UK.
    2. Liang. Y., Nikolic, M., Peng, Y., Chen, W., and Jiang. , Y. 2005. Organic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37: 1185–1195.
    3. Maguire, R.O., Sims, J.T., and Coal, F.J. 2000. Phosphorus fractionation in biosolid-Amended soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64: 2018-2024.
16. Megarbashi, M. 2005. Study of Plant debris and fertilizer levels on important agronomic characteristics and yield of wheat in Ahvaz weather conditions. PhD dissertation. Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz. 190 pages.
  1. Mohr, R., Entz, M., and Bulilied, W. 1999. Plant available nitrojen supply as affected by metohod and timing of alfalfa termination. Agronomy Journal, 91:622-30.
  2. Munns, R. 1993. Physsiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils, some dogmas and hypthese. Plant Cell Environment, 16(1):15-24.
  3. Najafinezhad, H., Rashidi, N., and Ravari, S.Z. 2005. Effects of seedbed preparation methods on yield of grain maize and some soil properties in double cropping system. Seed and Plant, 21: 315-33.
  4. Nelson, P.N., Ladd, J.N., and Oades, J.M. 1996. Decomposition of 14C-labelled plant material in a salt-affected soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28:433-441.
  5. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watenabe, F.S., and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, U.S. Department of Agriculture Cris, 939. USA.
  6. Raiesi, F. 2004. Soil properties and N application effects on microbial activities in two winter wheat cropping systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40: 88-92.
  7. Rietz, D.N., and Haynes, R.J. 2003. Effects of irrigation induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35: 845–854.
  8. Robinson, M.I., Dodle Sanders, A.A., and Mans ,T.A. 1997. How can stomata contribute to salinity tolerance? Annals of Botany, 80: 287-393.
  9. Sarathchandra, S.U., Ghani, A., Yeates, G.W., Burch, G., and Cox, N.R. 2001. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 953–964.
  10. Sardinha, M., Muller, Y., Schmeisky, H., and Joergensen, R.G. 2003. Microbial performance in soils along salinity gradient under acidic conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 23:237-244.
  11. Sarig, S., and Steinberger, Y. 1994. Microbial biomass response to seasonal fluctuation in soil salinity under the canopy of desert halophytes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 26:1405-1408
  12. Singh, A.K., Gare, N. 2005. Influence of salinity on growth and yield attributes in chickpea cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29:231-235.
  13. Thehrany, M. 1998. Effects of different management methods of wheat residues and nitrogen application on yield and yield components of canola in Ahvaz weather conditions. Master Thesis agriculture, pp126. Shaid Chamran University, Ahvaz.
    1. Van Bruggen, A.H.C., and Semeniv, A.M. 2000. In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Applied Soil Ecology, 15:13-24.
    2. Vanessa, N., Wong, L., Ram, C., Richarad, D., and Green, S.B. 2009. Carbon dynamics of sodic and saline soils following gypsum and organic marerial additions: laboratory incubation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41:29-40.
    3. Walkley, A., and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science.
    4. White, R.E. 1981. Retention and release of phosphate by soil and soil constituents. In Soil and Agriculture: Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry (John Wiley and Sons, New York) , 2.pp: 71-114.
    5. Willson, T.C., Paul, E.A., and Harwood, R.R. 2001. Biologically active soil organic matter fractions in sustainable cropping systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 16: 63–76.
    6. Yuan, L., Huang, J., and Yu, S. 1997. Responses of nitrogen and related enzyme activities to fertilization in rhizosphere of wheat. Pedosphere, 7: 141–148.
    7. Zeean, P.E., and Artin, W.J. 1997. Long term effects of residue management in wheat – sunflower rotation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 525-532.