Document Type : Volume 38 - Issue 1

Author

Shiraz University

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction Drought stress is one of the important environmental factors that limit distribution and productivity of major crops. Drought stress caused by reducing the availability of external water, which makes reduces the ability of the plant’s roots to take up nutrients and induced cellular and photo-oxidative damages, through the increased accumulations of reactive oxygen species. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by using different mechanisms such as production of siderophores, organic acids, proton, growth regulators, and other chelating agents, and creative of reductive conditions, increase dissolution of minerals and mobility of non-soluble nutrients and thus improve nutrients uptake and yield of plants. They can influence plant root morphology and change the quantity and quality of root exudates. Mycorrhizal symbiosis involves a complex interaction among plant, soil and mycorrhizal fungi. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations' relationship are rather important in crops because they are believed to increase nutrients uptake, improve plant fitness, and plant water relations and thus increase the drought resistance of host plants. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve water relations of plants in part due to increases of plant growth, nutrient uptake and antioxidant activities. Maize is an effective host of arbuscular mycorrhiza in infertile and drought conditions and its root system consists of different root types. Therefore, the objectives of this study was to evaluate the effects of Glomus intraradices, Pseudomonas fluorescens (as a PGPR bacterium) and drought stress on growth characteristics and micro-nutrients uptake of maize in a calcareous soil under maize cultivation.
Materials and Methods A greenhouse experiment in a factorial completely randomized design was conducted to evaluate the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus intraradices), Pseudomonas fluorescence, and drought stress on root colonization and absorption of micro-nutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu) by maize (Zea mays). The factors were consisted of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus at two levels: G0 (not inoculated with fungus) and G1 ( inoculated with Glomus intraradices), bacteria at two levels: B0 (not inoculated with bacterium) and B1 (inoculated with Pseudomonas fluorescence) and drought stress at four levels: S0 (without stress), S1 (75% FC), S2 (50% FC) and S3 (25% FC). Mycorrhizal inoculum was prepared through the trap culture of forage sorghum (Sorghum biocolor L.) with spore of Glomus intraradices. The potential of inoculum (spore numbers of 12 g-1 substrates and root colonization of 80%) was measured for spore extraction and counting, and evaluation of root colonization. The bacterium used in the present experiment was Pseudomonas fluorescens and provided by soil biology and biotechnology laboratory of College University of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Tehran University, Karaj, Iran. The bacterium had a high ability to dissolve poorly soluble organic and inorganic phosphate compounds, to produce siderophores, indole acetic acid (IAA), and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC)-deaminase enzyme. A non-sterile composite soil sample was collected from depth of 0-30 cm soil surface of Agriculture Research Station of Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran (fine, mixed, mesic, Calcixerollic Xerochrept). The samples were air-dried and passed through a 2mm sieve. Some physical and chemical properties of studied soil are measured. The seeds were inoculated with 1mL fresh and active suspension of bacterium (population of 1×108 colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter). After a growth period of 4 months, plant materials harvested and data were subjected to analysis of variance and means were compared by least significant difference.
Results and Discussion In non microbial treatments, wet and dry weights of shoot significantly decreased whereas other measured parameters had not significant changes under drought stress of 25% FC. At each level of drought stress, root colonization significantly higher in mycorrhizal treatments than non mycorrhizal treatments. The highest root colonization percent was observed in treatments of co-inoculation of plant with both inoculants. Co-inoculation of plant with both inoculants significantly increased morphological properties and shoot nutrients uptake except Fe uptake in comparison with non microbial treatments up to drought stress of 50% FC.
Conclusion All measured parameters ( leaf area, wet and dry weights of root, root colonization, shoot micronutrient uptake) except wet and dry weights of shoot significantly decreased with increasing of drought stress up to 25% of FC. Single and co-application of bacterium and fungus decreased the negative effects of drought stress under low levels of water stress. Root colonization significantly increased with single application of fungus and co-inoculation of plant with fungus and bacterium. Co-application of fungus and bactrieum increased shoot nutrients uptake except Fe uptake up to 50% FC in comparison with non inoculated treatments.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abduelafez, I., Moragues, M., Elamari, A.A., Buchleiter, G., and Stromberger, M. 2011. Growth promotion of winter wheat under drought stress by ACC deaminase positive bacteria. Annual meeting of the Soil Science Society of America, San Antonio, TX, October 16-19, 2011.
  2. Aliasgharzad, N., Neyshabouri, M.R., and Salimi, G. 2006. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on drought stress of soybean. Biologia. 61: 324-328.
  3. Auge R.M., Sheicel K.A., and Wample, R.L. 1987b. Leaf water and carbohydrate status of VA mycorrhizal rose exposed to drought stress. Plant and Soil, 99: 291-302.
  4. Auge, R.M., Sheicel, K.A., and Wample, R.L. 1987a. Rose leaf elasticity changes in response to mycorrhizal colonization and drought acclimation. Physiologia Plantarum, 70: 175-182.
  5. Bethlenfalvay, G.J., Brown, M.S., Ames, R.N., and Thomas, R.E. 1988. Effects of drought on host and endophyte development in mycorrhizal soybeans in relation to water use and phosphate uptake. Physiologia Plantarum, 11: 565-S71.
  6. Boomsma, C.R., and Vyn T.J. 2008. Maize drought tolerance: Potential improvements through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Field Crops Research, 108: 14-31.
  7. Caris, C., Hordt W., Hawkins H.J., Romheld V., and George E. 1998. Studies of iron transport by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae from soil to peanut and sorghum plants. Mycorrhizae, 8: 35-39.
  8. Carter, M.R., and Gregorich, E.G. 2008. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (2nd ed). CRC Press.Boca Raton, FL. P.1204
  9. Chen, B.D., Li, X.L., Tao, H.Q., Christie, P., and Wong, M.H. 2003. The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in calcareous soil spiked with various quantities of zinc. Chemosphere, 50(6): 839-846.
    1. Cooper, K.M. 1984. Physiology of VA mycorrhizal associations. pp. 155-186. In: VA Mycorrhiza, Powell, C. L., and D. J. Bagyaraj (eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.
    2. Copetta, A., Lingua G., and Berta, G. 2006. Effects of three AM fungi on growth, distribution of glandular hairs, and essential oil production in Ocimum basilicum L. var. Genovese. Mycorrhiza, 16: 485-494.
    3. Emamei, A., 1995. Methods of Plant Analysis, Volume 1, Issue No.982, Water and Soil Research Institute.(in Persian).
    4. Fitter, A.H. 1985. Functioning of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas under field conditions. New Phytology, 99: 257-265.
    5. Ghorchiani, M., Akbari, G., Alikhani, H.A., Allahdadi, I., and Zarei, M., 2011. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and Pseudomonas florescence bacterium on the ear traits, chlorophyll content and yield of Zea mays L. under moisture stress conditions, Water and Soil Science, 21:97-114.(in Persian with English abstract).
    6. Giasson P., Karam A., and Jaouich A. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and alleviation of soil stresses on plant growth. Pp. 99-134. In: Siddiqui Z. A, Akhtar M. S. and Futai, K. (eds) Mycorrhizae: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 
    7. Henri, F., Laurette N.N., Annette D., John Q., Wolfgang M., François-Xavier E. and Dieudonné N. 2008. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and plant growth promotion by strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from acidic soils of Cameroon. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2: 171-178.
    8. Khaosaad, T., Vierheilig, H., and Nell, M. 2006. Arbuscular mycorrhiza alter the concentration of essential oils in oregano (Origanum sp., Lamiaceae). Mycorrhizae, 16: 443-446.
    9. Kormanik, P.P., and McGraw, A.C. 1982. Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant root. Pp. 37-45. In: Schenk N .C (ed), Methods and principles of mycorrhizal reseach, The American Phytopathological Society, St.Paul.
    10. Kramer, P.J. 1969. Plant and soil water relationship. A modern synthesis, McGraw.Hill, New York. pp. 482.
    11. Leon, V., and Kochain.  L. 1991. Mechanisms of micronutrient uptake and translocation in plant. Pp. 229-285. In: Mortvelt, J. J., F. R. Cox, L. M. Shuman, and R. M. Welch (eds). Micronutrient in Agriculture. 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wl.
    12. Liu, A., Hamel C., Hamilton R. I., Ma B. L., and Smith D. L. 2000. Acquisition of Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe by mycorrhizal maize (Zea mays L.) grown in soil at different P and micronutrient levels. Mycorrhizae, 9: 331-336.
    13. Mohammad, M.J., and Malkawi H.I. 2004. Root, shoot and nutrient acquisition responses of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal wheat to phosphorus application to highly calcareous soils. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 3 (3): 363-369.
    14. Neue siete 1. 2008. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Glomeromycota http://schuessler.userweb.mwn.de/amphyl, (accessed April 2015).
    15. Nezarat, C., and Gholami, A. 2009. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on agronomic traits of maize under water stress, 11th Iranian Soil Science Congress, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.(in Persian).
    16. Pandy, A., Sharma, E., and Plani, L. K. S. 1998. Influence of bacterial inculation on maize in upland farming systems of the Sikkim Himalaya. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30(3): 379-384.
    17. Saadat A, Savaghebi, G.h. R., Rejali, F., Khavazei, K., and Shirmardi, M. 2009. The evaluation of some plant growth promoting Pseudomonas fluorescence strains and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on root colonization of wheat (Cistan and Chamran cultivars).11th Iranian Soil Science Congress, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.(in Persian).
    18. Sepaskhah, A.R., and Yarami, N. 2009. Interaction effects of irrigation regime and salinity on flower yield and growth of saffron, Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 84 (2): 216-222.
    19. Subramanian, K.S., Charest, C., Dwyer, L.M., and Hamilton, R.I. 1997. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza on leaf water potential, sugar content and P content during drought and recovery of maize. Canadian Journal of Botany, 75: 1582–1591.
    20. Vamerali, T., Saccomani, M., Mosca, S., Guarise, N., and Ganis, A. 2003. A comparison of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids. Plant and Soil, 255: 157- 167.
    21. Vyas, P., and Gulati, A. 2009. Stress tolerance and genetic variability of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas fluorescens from the cold deserts of the trans-Himalayas. Microbiology Ecollogy, 58: 425-434.

Wu, S.C., Cao, Z.H., Li, Z.G., Cheung, K.C., and Wong, M.H. 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma, 125: 155-166.