مطالعه اثرات ضربه های استاتیکی و دینامیکی بر سطح کوفتگی و تغییر پارامترهای فیزیولوژیک میوه سیب

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد گروه مکانیک بیوسیستم دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مکانیک بیوسیستم دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه باغبانی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش ضربه­های استاتیکی و دینامیکی و همچنین زمان انبارداری، به­عنوان فاکتورهای مستقل در نظر گرفته شد و اثرات این عوامل، بر روی پارامترهای شیمیایی مهم، از جمله قند، اسیدیته و فنل اندازه­گیری و سطح کوفتگی سیب، مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مساحت کوفتگی با استفاده از تکنیک پردازش تصویر و  به کمک نرم‌افزارImageJ  اندازه­گیری شد.ضربه استاتیکی، به­وسیله دستگاه  نیرو- تغییر شکل انجام شد و شامل سه سرعت بارگذاری 5، 7 و 10mm/min و به­مدت 1 دقیقه بود. ضربه دینامیکی، به وسیله یک پاندول که انرژی وارده به سیب در اثر سقوط از ارتفاع را شبیه سازی می­کرد به نمونه­ها وارد شد. مقدار انرژی معادل  25/2 ، 3 و75/3 ژول بود. سیب­های ضربه دیده در 3 مدت زمان 20 ، 40 و 60 روز نگه­داری شدند، تا اثرات ضربه بر تغییرات پارامترهای شیمیایی اندازه­گیری شده و همچنین سطح کوفتگی معین شود. آزمایش‌ها به صورت فاکتوریل و در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی و در 3 سطح و 3 تکرار انجام شد. نتایج آزمایش‌ها نشان داد که تغییرات اسیدیته و سطح کوفتگی در مدت انبار مانی تحت ضربه استاتیکی و دینامیکی در سطح 1 و 5 درصد و برای فنل و قند کل به ترتیب در سطح 5 و 1 معنی­دار بود؛ همچنین در این آزمایش، با گذشت زمان، به­طور کلی میزان قند و اسیدیته کاهش و فنل و سطح کوفتگی افزایش یافت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Changes in physiological parameters and the apple stiffness due to the static and dynamic impacts

نویسندگان [English]

  • Armin Ziaratban 1
  • M Azadbakht 2
  • Azim Ghasemnezhad 3
1 Department of Biosystem Mechanical Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
3 Department of Horticulture, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background and objective Unlike engineering materials, apples are living tissues which survive after harvesting. Thus, post-harvest processes such as transporting and packaging should be carried out in a way that makes them less vulnerable. Among the agricultural products, fruits and vegetables are the commodities that due to their low resistance to the shell and high humidity, have a high sensitivity against mechanical damages that occur when processing them. In order to minimize waste, proper post-harvest management and convenient techniques for transport and storage are required. Mechanical damages can occur in three major ways, including pressure, impact, and abrasion. The pressure during the harvest may impose on the fruits by pickers or occur when fruits are stored in the bottom of the box. External damages may happen due to the weight of picked apples in the baskets in deep boxes or when transporting the boxes by hooks. In fruit packaging stations, pressure, impact, and vibration can occur when packaging of fruits in boxes, as well as the washing and waxing fruits. Pressure forces usually happen during transport and storage of the fruit. This study was undertaken to study the impact on sugar, phenol, acidity and fatigue area that play a major role in the final quality of the product.
Materials and methods Static and dynamic impacts and storage time were considered as the independent factors in this study and their effects were analyzed on the chemical parameters including sugar, phenol, acidity and fatigue area. The static impact was conducted by Instron Sntam with three loading speed 5, 7, and 10 mm/min for 1min. The dynamic impact was conducted by a pendulum that simulated the energy applied to apples that dropped. The amount of energy was equivalent to 2.25, 3 and 3.75 J. Apples that underwent impacts,  were kept for 20, 40 and 60 days to measure the impact on changes of chemical parameters and determine the area of fatigue. After each storage period, the samples were photographed. The area of fatigue was measured using image processing techniques and Image J software. The image processing consists of two parts: hardware and software. The hardware of computers, cameras and imaging chamber is formed. The camera was connected by cable to a computer and the images were stored on a computer's permanent memory. Used computers used running windows seven, five-core central processing unit, and RAM was 4 Giga bytes. Computer is the processing of the data and the image acquisition step to the final step, the output data is the most important role. The used camera was a Canon, made in Japan, was mounted vertically inside the box. Shooting box was used just because all the photos must be taken in a constant condition of light regarding light intensity of surroundings and distance of apples from the camera. The Chamber was made of wood and shaped like a cube with dimensions of 45 × 45 × 45 cm, which is just an open area. Three eight-watt fluorescent lamps for lighting inside the box was fixed to the ceiling box around the triangle mounted camera. Image J analyzer is a powerful software with various uses. This software can calculate the area and pixel value statistics of user-selected portions of the image. Factorial experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design with three replications.
Results Results revealed that acidity changes and fatigue area during the storage under static and dynamic impacts were significant at 0.01 and 0.05% and for phenol and sugar were significant at 1 and 5%. Also, in this test, sugar content and acidity were generally reduced over time, and phenol and fatigue area increased.
Conclusion In order to avoid excessive reduction in sugar and fruit quality, maintenance time should be reduced as much as possible. Phenol increased during storage, after applying impact; its oxidation when contacting air results in toxic compounds that are harmful to humans. Therefore, packaging using the pads and increasing the quality of the harvesting and transporting is necessary in order to reduce the damages to the fruit. Fruit acidity during storage after the impacts showed the significant changes that could negatively affect the taste of the fruit and as a result, its marketability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Apple
  • Static Impact
  • Dynamic Impact
  • Storage
  • Fatigue
  • Chemical Parameters
  1. Afkari Sayyah, A.H. Esmailiyan, M. Minaei, S. Pirayesh, A. 2008.The Effect of Mechanical Loads on Apple Damage after Storage. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 5:3. 37-44.(In persian).
  2. Azadbakht, M.  Aghili, H.  Asghari, A.  Kiapey, A.2015.  Determining the Fatigue Level of the Apple (Yellow DeliciousVar.) in a fall from a Height onto the Surface of Various Materials using Image Processing. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences,4:11.1-5.
  3. Barchi, G.L. Berardinelli, A. Guarnieri, A. Ragni, L. Fila, T.C. 2002. Damage to Loquats by Vibration-simulating Intrastate Transport. Biosystem Engneering, 82:3. 305–312.
  4. Dokhani, Sh. Beheshti, R. 2004. HPLC Analysis of Dominant Sugars and Organic Acids of Two Apple Cultivars from Semirom Region in Packages During Cold Storage. JWSS - Isfahan University of Technology, 7: 4. 169-184. (In persian).
  5. Fernandez, M.S. Villano, D. Troncoso, A.M. Garcia-Parrilla, M.C. 2008. Antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds: From in vitro results to in vivo evidence. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48:7.649–671.
  6. Kampp, J. Nissen, G. 1990. Impact damage susceptibility of Danish apples. Paper presented at International Work shop, Impact damage in fruit and vegetables.Pp: 28-29.
  7. Kupferman, E. 2006. Minimizing bruising in apples, Postharvest Information Network, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center.
  8. Lewis, R. A. Yoxall. M. Marshall, B. and Canty. L. A.  2008. Characterizing pressure and bruising in apple fruit. Wear 264(1-2), 37–46.
  9. Mashayekhi, K. Atashi, S.2016.  Guide plant physiology experiments (studies before and after harvest) Mashayekhi, Agricultural Education Research Publications, 978-600-8248-64-4.
  10. Mohsenin, N.N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
  11. Peleg, K. Hinga, S. 1986. Simulation of vibration damage in produce transportation. Transactions of the ASAE - American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 29:1. 633–641.
  12. Peng, Y. Lu, R. 2008. Analysis of spatially resolved hyperspectral scattering images for assessing apple fruit firmness and soluble solids content. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 48:1. 52-62.
  13. Sherif, S. M. 1976.The quasi-static contact problem for nearly incompressible agricultural products, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
  14. Sitkei, G. 1986. Mechanics of Agricultural Materials. Elsevier, Amesterdam. Slaughter, D. C., Hinsch, R. T., Thompson, J. F. Assessment of Vibration Injury to Bartlett Pears. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 36:4.1043-1047.
  15. Zarifneshat, S.  Rohani, A. Ettefagh, M.M.  and Saeidirad, M.H. 2013 . Predictions of apple bruise volume by using RBF artificial neural network and comparison it with regression. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 4:2.45-65. (In persian)